16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Development and Pilot Implementation of TACTICS VR: A Virtual Reality-Based Stroke Management Workflow Training Application and Training Framework

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Delays in acute stroke treatment contribute to severe and negative impacts for patients and significant healthcare costs. Variability in clinical care is a contributor to delayed treatment, particularly in rural, regional and remote (RRR) areas. Targeted approaches to improve stroke workflow processes improve outcomes, but numerous challenges exist particularly in RRR settings. Virtual reality (VR) applications can provide immersive and engaging training and overcome some existing training barriers. We recently initiated the TACTICS trial, which is assessing a “package intervention” to support advanced CT imaging and streamlined stroke workflow training. As part of the educational component of the intervention we developed TACTICS VR, a novel VR-based training application to upskill healthcare professionals in optimal stroke workflow processes. In the current manuscript, we describe development of the TACTICS VR platform which includes the VR-based training application, a user-facing website and an automated back-end data analytics portal. TACTICS VR was developed via an extensive and structured scoping and consultation process, to ensure content was evidence-based, represented best-practice and is tailored for the target audience. Further, we report on pilot implementation in 7 Australian hospitals to assess the feasibility of workplace-based VR training. A total of 104 healthcare professionals completed TACTICS VR training. Users indicated a high level of usability, acceptability and utility of TACTICS VR, including aspects of hardware, software design, educational content, training feedback and implementation strategy. Further, users self-reported increased confidence in their ability to make improvements in stroke management after TACTICS VR training (post-training mean ± SD = 4.1 ± 0.6; pre-training = 3.6 ± 0.9; 1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). Very few technical issues were identified, supporting the feasibility of this training approach. Thus, we propose that TACTICS VR is a fit-for-purpose, evidence-based training application for stroke workflow optimisation that can be readily deployed on-site in a clinical setting.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          An Empirical Evaluation of the System Usability Scale

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems

              Background Implementing new practices requires changes in the behaviour of relevant actors, and this is facilitated by understanding of the determinants of current and desired behaviours. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was developed by a collaboration of behavioural scientists and implementation researchers who identified theories relevant to implementation and grouped constructs from these theories into domains. The collaboration aimed to provide a comprehensive, theory-informed approach to identify determinants of behaviour. The first version was published in 2005, and a subsequent version following a validation exercise was published in 2012. This guide offers practical guidance for those who wish to apply the TDF to assess implementation problems and support intervention design. It presents a brief rationale for using a theoretical approach to investigate and address implementation problems, summarises the TDF and its development, and describes how to apply the TDF to achieve implementation objectives. Examples from the implementation research literature are presented to illustrate relevant methods and practical considerations. Methods Researchers from Canada, the UK and Australia attended a 3-day meeting in December 2012 to build an international collaboration among researchers and decision-makers interested in the advancing use of the TDF. The participants were experienced in using the TDF to assess implementation problems, design interventions, and/or understand change processes. This guide is an output of the meeting and also draws on the authors’ collective experience. Examples from the implementation research literature judged by authors to be representative of specific applications of the TDF are included in this guide. Results We explain and illustrate methods, with a focus on qualitative approaches, for selecting and specifying target behaviours key to implementation, selecting the study design, deciding the sampling strategy, developing study materials, collecting and analysing data, and reporting findings of TDF-based studies. Areas for development include methods for triangulating data, e.g. from interviews, questionnaires and observation and methods for designing interventions based on TDF-based problem analysis. Conclusions We offer this guide to the implementation community to assist in the application of the TDF to achieve implementation objectives. Benefits of using the TDF include the provision of a theoretical basis for implementation studies, good coverage of potential reasons for slow diffusion of evidence into practice and a method for progressing from theory-based investigation to intervention. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0605-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Neurol
                Front Neurol
                Front. Neurol.
                Frontiers in Neurology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-2295
                11 November 2021
                2021
                : 12
                : 665808
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Centre for Advanced Training Systems, The University of Newcastle , Callaghan, NSW, Australia
                [2] 2School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, College of Health Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle , Callaghan, NSW, Australia
                [3] 3Hunter Medical Research Institute , New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
                [4] 4School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle , Callaghan, NSW, Australia
                [5] 5Department of Medicine and Neurology, Melbourne Brain Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital , Melbourne, VIC, Australia
                [6] 6Department of Neurology, John Hunter Hospital , New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
                [7] 7The Sydney Partnership for Health, Education, Research and Enterprise (SPHERE) , Sydney, NSW, Australia
                Author notes

                Edited by: Swathi Kiran, Boston University, United States

                Reviewed by: Silke Walter, Saarland University Hospital, Germany; Lila Landowski, University of Tasmania, Australia

                *Correspondence: Frederick R. Walker rohan.walker@ 123456newcastle.edu.au

                This article was submitted to Stroke, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neurology

                †These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

                Article
                10.3389/fneur.2021.665808
                8631764
                34858305
                fa028d99-1960-441f-9100-fabf9ff61aad
                Copyright © 2021 Hood, Maltby, Keynes, Kluge, Nalivaiko, Ryan, Cox, Parsons, Paul, Garcia-Esperon, Spratt, Levi and Walker.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 09 February 2021
                : 18 October 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 45, Pages: 12, Words: 8682
                Categories
                Neurology
                Original Research

                Neurology
                virtual reality,technology,medical education,medical training,stroke workflow,hyper-acute stroke management

                Comments

                Comment on this article