20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Systematic Review on the Use of Aspirin in the Prevention of Deep Vein Thrombosis in Major Elective Lower Limb Orthopedic Surgery: An Update from the Past 3 Years

      review-article
      1 , , MB, MS, DNB, MCh, FRCS 1 , 4 , , MBBCh, MFSEM, MSc, PhD, FEBOT, FRCS 2 , 3
      The Surgery Journal
      Thieme Medical Publishers
      aspirin, anticoagulants, venous thromboembolism, prophylaxis, deep vein thrombosis

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction  Currently there are no consensuses in the national guidance on thromboprophylaxis following major elective lower limb surgery. Emerging clinical evidence suggests that aspirin could be just as effective as anticoagulants with a lower cost. The aim of this study was to provide an update based on literature of the past 3 years for the use of aspirin as thromboprophylaxis after knee and hip arthroplasty.

          Materials and Methods  MEDLINE/EMBASE search was performed with appropriate terms for original articles from 2014 to 2017.

          Results  Eight articles were found. Five articles concluded that aspirin was an effective prophylactic. The collation of results on the deep vein thrombosis rate involved 43,012 patients who were prescribed aspirin, of which 283 (0.66%) suffered from symptomatic deep vein thromboses. Aspirin was noted for its good side effect profile and cost effectiveness. It was noted that anticoagulants had a higher rate of complications, including bleeding and wound-oozing.

          Conclusion  Aspirin is an effective and safe prophylactic against deep vein thrombosis following major elective lower limb arthroplasty surgery.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Prevention of VTE in orthopedic surgery patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

          VTE is a serious, but decreasing complication following major orthopedic surgery. This guideline focuses on optimal prophylaxis to reduce postoperative pulmonary embolism and DVT. The methods of this guideline follow those described in Methodology for the Development of Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis Guidelines: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines in this supplement. In patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery, we recommend the use of one of the following rather than no antithrombotic prophylaxis: low-molecular-weight heparin; fondaparinux; dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban (total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty but not hip fracture surgery); low-dose unfractionated heparin; adjusted-dose vitamin K antagonist; aspirin (all Grade 1B); or an intermittent pneumatic compression device (IPCD) (Grade 1C) for a minimum of 10 to 14 days. We suggest the use of low-molecular-weight heparin in preference to the other agents we have recommended as alternatives (Grade 2C/2B), and in patients receiving pharmacologic prophylaxis, we suggest adding an IPCD during the hospital stay (Grade 2C). We suggest extending thromboprophylaxis for up to 35 days (Grade 2B). In patients at increased bleeding risk, we suggest an IPCD or no prophylaxis (Grade 2C). In patients who decline injections, we recommend using apixaban or dabigatran (all Grade 1B). We suggest against using inferior vena cava filter placement for primary prevention in patients with contraindications to both pharmacologic and mechanical thromboprophylaxis (Grade 2C). We recommend against Doppler (or duplex) ultrasonography screening before hospital discharge (Grade 1B). For patients with isolated lower-extremity injuries requiring leg immobilization, we suggest no thromboprophylaxis (Grade 2B). For patients undergoing knee arthroscopy without a history of VTE, we suggest no thromboprophylaxis (Grade 2B). Optimal strategies for thromboprophylaxis after major orthopedic surgery include pharmacologic and mechanical approaches.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Autopsy proven pulmonary embolism in hospital patients: are we detecting enough deep vein thrombosis?

            To investigate the present status of pulmonary embolism as a cause of death in a general hospital patient population, a 5-year retrospective study of all autopsy reports and associated hospital records was undertaken. Pulmonary embolism was thought to be the cause of death in 239 of 2388 autopsies performed (10%): 15% of these patients were aged less than 60 years and 68% did not have cancer. Of these patients, 83% had deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) in the legs at autopsy, of whom only 19% had symptoms of DVT before death. Only 3% of patients who had DVT at autopsy had undergone an investigation for such before death. Twenty-four per cent of patients who died from pulmonary embolism had undergone surgery a mean of 6.9 days before. Screening tests for DVT should be applied widely in the hospital population.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Economic burden of deep-vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and post-thrombotic syndrome.

              Deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) are associated with major morbidity and mortality, with their burden often extending to longer-term complications such as event recurrence and post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Few data exist on the overall economic burden of DVT and PE and their sequelae. A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted to determine the direct medical costs of a DVT or PE patient across the entire continuum of care. Administrative claims data for patients with a DVT or PE diagnosis (ICD-9-CM code) and patients with possible evidence of PTS between January 1, 1997, and March 31, 2004, were extracted from the PharMetrics Patient-Centric Database, which comprises fully adjudicated medical and pharmaceutical claims for U.S. health care-plan enrollees. Resource utilization and annualized direct medical costs of care for patients with DVT and/or PE were calculated and compared with matched controls. A total of 26,958 patients met the study inclusion criteria. Of the 17,634 patients evaluable for the PTS cohort, 663 (3.8%) patients experienced PTS. Patients with DVT, PE, or DVT and PE had higher annualized direct medical costs before the index (initial) DVT and/or PE event (median: $7227, $6381, and $6771, respectively) than controls (median: $1045). During and after the DVT/PE event, annualized median costs rose to $17,512, $18,901, and $25,554, respectively, compared with $680 in the control group. Annualized median total costs for the PTS group were $20,569 compared with $15,843 in matched controls with DVT and/or PE and no PTS. These data suggest that the initial acute DVT or PE event is associated with high total health care costs and that these costs are further increased by subsequent events such as recurrent DVT or PE and PTS. Early detection and appropriate treatment of this high-risk population have the potential for both clinical and economic benefits.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Surg J (N Y)
                Surg J (N Y)
                10.1055/s-00028781
                The Surgery Journal
                Thieme Medical Publishers (333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. )
                2378-5128
                2378-5136
                October 2017
                29 December 2017
                : 3
                : 4
                : e191-e196
                Affiliations
                [1 ]South Wales Orthopaedic Research Network, Cardiff University, Welshbone, Cardiff, United Kingdom
                [2 ]Grantham and District Hospital, United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Lincoln, United Kingdom
                [3 ]Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic, LEO Institute, Grantham, United Kingdom
                [4 ]Princess of Wales Hospital, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Health Board, Bridgend, United Kingdom
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence Dylan A. Mistry South Wales Orthopaedic Research Network, Cardiff University Park Place, Cardiff, CF10 3ATUnited Kingdom MistryDA@ 123456cardiff.ac.uk
                Article
                1700053re
                10.1055/s-0037-1615817
                5747531
                29302621
                fa126d7f-948b-48df-bca2-7200d7e8b707

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 02 November 2017
                : 27 November 2017
                Categories
                Review Article

                aspirin,anticoagulants,venous thromboembolism,prophylaxis,deep vein thrombosis

                Comments

                Comment on this article