23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Tafenoquine for preventing relapse in people with Plasmodium vivax malaria

      systematic-review
      , ,
      Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group
      The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
      John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Plasmodium vivax malaria has a persistent liver stage that causes relapse of the disease and continued P vivax transmission. Primaquine (PQ) is used to clear the liver stage of the parasite, but treatment is required for 14 days. Primaquine also causes haemolysis in people with glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency. Tafenoquine (TQ) is a new alternative to PQ with a longer half‐life and can be used as a single‐dose treatment.

          Objectives

          To assess the effects of tafenoquine 300 mg (single dose) on preventing P vivax relapse.

          Search methods

          We searched the following up to 3 June 2020: the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register; CENTRAL; MEDLINE; Embase; and three other databases. We also searched the WHO International Clinical Trial Registry Platform and the metaRegister of Controlled Trials for ongoing trials using "tafenoquine" and "malaria" as search terms up to 3 June 2020.

          Selection criteria

          Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that gave TQ to prevent relapse in people with P vivax malaria. We planned to include trials irrespective of whether participants had been screened for G6PD enzyme deficiency.

          Data collection and analysis

          All review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. As true relapse and reinfection are difficult to differentiate in people living in endemic areas , studies report "recurrences" of infection as a proxy for relapse. We carried out meta‐analysis where appropriate, and gave estimates as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.

          Main results

          Three individually randomized RCTs met our inclusion criteria, all in endemic areas, and thus reporting recurrence. Trials compared TQ with PQ or placebo, and all participants received chloroquine (CQ) to treat the asexual infection). In all trials, pregnant and G6PD‐deficient people were excluded.

          Tafenoquine 300 mg single dose versus no treatment for relapse prevention

          Two trials assessed this comparison. TQ 300 mg single dose reduces P vivax recurrences compared to no antihypnozoite treatment during a six‐month follow‐up, but there is moderate uncertainty around effect size (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.88; 2 trials, 504 participants; moderate‐certainty evidence).

          In people with normal G6PD status, there is probably little or no difference in any type of adverse events (2 trials, 504 participants; moderate‐certainty evidence). However, we are uncertain if TQ causes more serious adverse events (2 trials, 504 participants; very low‐certainty evidence). Both RCTs reported a total of 23 serious adverse events in TQ groups (One RCT reported 21 events) and a majority (15 events) were a drop in haemoglobin level by > 3g/dl (or >30% reduction from baseline).

          Tafenoquine 300 mg single dose versus primaquine 15 mg/day for 14 days for relapse prevention

          Three trials assessed this comparison. There is probably little or no difference between TQ and PQ in preventing recurrences (proxy measure for relapse) up to six months of follow‐up (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.8 to 1.34; 3 trials, 747 participants; moderate‐certainty evidence).

          In people with normal G6PD status, there is probably little or no difference in any type of adverse events (3 trials, 747 participants; moderate‐certainty evidence). We are uncertain if TQ can cause more serious adverse events compared to PQ (3 trials, 747 participants; very low‐certainty evidence). Two trials had higher point estimates against TQ while the other showed the reverse. Most commonly reported serious adverse event in TQ group was a decline in haemoglobin level (19 out of 29 events). Some other serious adverse events, though observed in the TQ group, are unlikely to be caused by it (Hepatitis E infection, limb abscess, pneumonia, menorrhagia).

          Authors' conclusions

          TQ 300 mg single dose prevents relapses after clinically parasitologically confirmed P vivax malaria compared to no antihypnozoite treatment, and with no difference detected in studies comparing it to PQ to date. However, the inability to differentiate a true relapse from a recurrence in the available studies may affect these estimates. The drug is untested in children and in people with G6PD deficiency. Single‐dose treatment is an important practical advantage compared to using PQ for the same purpose without an overall increase in adverse events in non‐pregnant, non‐G6PD‐deficient adults.

          Plain language summary

          Tafenoquine for preventing relapse in people with vivax malaria

          What was the aim of this review?

          The aim of this review was to see if tafenoquine could prevent relapses of vivax infections and if this effect is equivalent to that of standard‐dose primaquine. Standard‐dose primaquine is defined as 15 mg/day for 14 days for adults.

          Key messages

          Tafenoquine prevents vivax malaria relapses (measured as recurrences of infection in all studies as it is not possible to differentiate a true relapse from a reinfection) in adults compared to no relapse prevention treatment (placebo). There is also probably little or no difference between tafenoquine and primaquine in preventing relapses. The evidence was of moderate certainty due to the low number of studies and few data. There is probably little or no difference in the overall adverse events with tafenoquine compared to placebo or primaquine. However, we are uncertain if tafenoquine causes more serious adverse events such as a drop in blood haemoglobin.

          What was studied in this review?

          Vivax malaria is caused by the parasite Plasmodium vivax. The disease includes a dormant (inactive) stage of liver infection and this can cause relapse (worsening) unless it is treated.

          The most frequently used medicine for relapse prevention until recently was primaquine, but now there is a new alternative named tafenoquine. The US agency responsible for protecting public health, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), recommends tafenoquine for relapse prevention at a single 300 mg dose. Compared to primaquine, which is usually given daily for 14 days, single‐day dosing provides a significant advantage. However, both primaquine and tafenoquine can cause rupture or destruction of red blood cells (called haemolysis) in people with a hereditary condition called glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) enzyme deficiency.

          We conducted a Cochrane Review on the effect of tafenoquine on clearing the dormant P vivax parasites in infected people to prevent a relapse. However, it is difficult to differentiate between a true relapse and a new infection in the same individual unless the person was removed from a malaria‐endemic area after initial treatment. All trials included in this review did not do that and have actually measured recurrences as a proxy measure to infer on relapses. While acknowledging this limitation, in giving recommendations and results in this review we used the word 'relapse' as preventing relapses is the intention for using tafenoquine as a single dose in these trials.

          What are the main results of the review?

          We examined the research published up to 3 June 2020. We identified three trials conducted in nine countries in 747 adults with confirmed P vivax malaria. All adults received chloroquine (to clear the parasites from the blood) and some groups received either tafenoquine in a single dose of 300 mg, primaquine or placebo (an inactive tablet matched for the duration of primaquine). All were observed for recurrences of P vivax malaria (up to six months) and all trials tested people for G6PD activity and excluded people who were deficient. Pregnant women and children were also excluded.

          Adults receiving tafenoquine 300 mg had fewer relapses (inferred from the lower number of recurrences of infection) than adults who had placebo (moderate‐certainty evidence). There was probably little or no difference between Tafenoquine 300 mg and primaquine for relapse prevention (moderate‐certainty evidence). There is probably little or no difference in overall side effects between tafenoquine and primaquine (moderate‐certainty evidence). We are uncertain though if tafenoquine causes more serious adverse events compared to placebo or premaquine (for example, haemolysis; very low‐certainty evidence).

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Vivax malaria: neglected and not benign.

            Plasmodium vivax threatens almost 40% of the world's population, resulting in 132-391 million clinical infections each year. Most of these cases originate from Southeast Asia and the Western Pacific, although a significant number also occurs in Africa and South America. Although often regarded as causing a benign and self-limiting infection, there is increasing evidence that the overall burden, economic impact, and severity of disease from P. vivax have been underestimated. Malaria control strategies have had limited success and are confounded by the lack of access to reliable diagnosis, emergence of multidrug resistant isolates, the parasite's ability to transmit early in the course of disease and relapse from dormant liver stages at varying time intervals after the initial infection. Progress in reducing the burden of disease will require improved access to reliable diagnosis and effective treatment of both blood-stage and latent parasites, and more detailed characterization of the epidemiology, morbidity, and economic impact of vivax malaria. Without these, vivax malaria will continue to be neglected by ministries of health, policy makers, researchers, and funding bodies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Global extent of chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium vivax: a systematic review and meta-analysis

              Summary Background Chloroquine is the first-line treatment for Plasmodium vivax malaria in most endemic countries, but resistance is increasing. Monitoring of antimalarial efficacy is essential, but in P vivax infections the assessment of treatment efficacy is confounded by relapse from the dormant liver stages. We systematically reviewed P vivax malaria treatment efficacy studies to establish the global extent of chloroquine resistance. Methods We searched Medline, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to identify studies published in English between Jan 1, 1960, and April 30, 2014, which investigated antimalarial treatment efficacy in P vivax malaria. We excluded studies that did not include supervised schizonticidal treatment without primaquine. We determined rates of chloroquine resistance according to P vivax malaria recurrence rates by day 28 whole-blood chloroquine concentrations at the time of recurrence and study enrolment criteria. Findings We identified 129 eligible clinical trials involving 21 694 patients at 179 study sites and 26 case reports describing 54 patients. Chloroquine resistance was present in 58 (53%) of 113 assessable study sites, spread across most countries that are endemic for P vivax. Clearance of parasitaemia assessed by microscopy in 95% of patients by day 2, or all patients by day 3, was 100% predictive of chloroquine sensitivity. Interpretation Heterogeneity of study design and analysis has confounded global surveillance of chloroquine-resistant P vivax, which is now present across most countries endemic for P vivax. Improved methods for monitoring of drug resistance are needed to inform antimalarial policy in these regions. Funding Wellcome Trust (UK).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cochrane Database Syst Rev
                Cochrane Database Syst Rev
                14651858
                10.1002/14651858
                The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
                John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (Chichester, UK )
                1469-493X
                6 September 2020
                September 2020
                6 September 2020
                : 2020
                : 9
                : CD010458
                Affiliations
                deptDepartment of Pathology, School of Medical Sciences University of New South Wales SydneyAustralia
                deptDepartment of Clinical Medicine Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo ColomboSri Lanka
                deptDepartment of Parasitology Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo ColomboSri Lanka
                Article
                CD010458.pub3 CD010458
                10.1002/14651858.CD010458.pub3
                8094590
                32892362
                fa2f394e-f544-4565-8ee8-e7dbb5cc1ea6
                Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Cochrane Collaboration.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial Licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                Categories
                Blood disorders
                Child health
                Infectious disease
                Malaria

                Comments

                Comment on this article