41
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      News Media and Connectivity in Deliberative Systems: Reflections on the Debate about the Brazilian Age of Criminal Responsibility,

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This article discusses the role of the media in deliberative systems, focusing on the relationship between the news media and the formal arena that is the Brazilian National Congress. We investigate the different ways in which the news media are appropriated by politicians, experts and ordinary citizens in public hearings. We focus on a case study of public hearings on the reduction of the age of criminal responsibility in Brazil, a controversial issue that has given rise to discussions in different arenas — including such formal ones as the National Congress and such informal ones as social networks and the news media. Our data come from transcripts of public hearings organized by the Brazilian Senate and broadcast on the Senate website and news articles on the issue of criminal responsibility and violence committed by adolescents published during the period of the deliberations. Our findings suggest that people use media materials for different purposes in debates, sometimes to support their own arguments, sometimes to delegitimize alternative opinions. Thus, our results support the idea that the media can function as a connector between different arenas in a deliberative system.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Sociedade civil, instituições participativas e representação: da autorização à legitimidade da ação

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Violent video games and the Supreme Court: lessons for the scientific community in the wake of Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association.

              In June 2011 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that video games enjoy full free speech protections and that the regulation of violent game sales to minors is unconstitutional. The Supreme Court also referred to psychological research on violent video games as "unpersuasive" and noted that such research contains many methodological flaws. Recent reviews in many scholarly journals have come to similar conclusions, although much debate continues. Given past statements by the American Psychological Association linking video game and media violence with aggression, the Supreme Court ruling, particularly its critique of the science, is likely to be shocking and disappointing to some psychologists. One possible outcome is that the psychological community may increase the conclusiveness of their statements linking violent games to harm as a form of defensive reaction. However, in this article the author argues that the psychological community would be better served by reflecting on this research and considering whether the scientific process failed by permitting and even encouraging statements about video game violence that exceeded the data or ignored conflicting data. Although it is likely that debates on this issue will continue, a move toward caution and conservatism as well as increased dialogue between scholars on opposing sides of this debate will be necessary to restore scientific credibility. The current article reviews the involvement of the psychological science community in the Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association case and suggests that it might learn from some of the errors in this case for the future. (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                bpsr
                Brazilian Political Science Review
                Bras. Political Sci. Rev.
                Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (São Paulo, SP, Brazil )
                1981-3821
                2021
                : 15
                : 1
                : e0003
                Affiliations
                [1] Belo Horizonte Minas Gerais orgnameUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais Brazil
                Article
                S1981-38212021000100200 S1981-3821(21)01500100200
                10.1590/1981-3821202100010002
                fa593230-6627-448c-8069-85b5a4c711d5

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 15 May 2019
                : 21 March 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 64, Pages: 0
                Product

                SciELO Brazil

                Categories
                Articles

                reduction of the age of criminal responsibility,news media,deliberative systems,Deliberative democracy

                Comments

                Comment on this article