1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      An optimised eDNA protocol for detecting fish in lentic and lotic freshwaters using a small water volume

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Environmental DNA is increasingly being used for assessing the presence and relative abundance of fish in freshwater, but existing protocols typically rely on filtering large volumes of water which is not always practical. We compared the effects of water volume, filtration type and eDNA extraction procedures in the detection of fish in three freshwater bodies (pond, lake and river) using a short fragment of the 12s rRNA mtDNA gene. Quantification of eDNA capture efficiency after DNA extraction, as well as amplification efficiency, were evaluated by conventional PCR and quantitative PCR. No significant differences on eDNA capture yield were found among freshwater bodies, but increasing water volume had a positive effect on eDNA capture and amplification efficiency. Although highest eDNA capture rates were obtained using 2 L of filtered water, 100 mL syringe filtration in combination with ethanol- sodium acetate precipitation proved to be more practical and increased quantitative PCR amplification efficiency by 6.4%. Our results indicate that such method may be optimal to detect fish species effectively across both lotic and lentic freshwater environments.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Environmental DNA for wildlife biology and biodiversity monitoring.

            Extraction and identification of DNA from an environmental sample has proven noteworthy recently in detecting and monitoring not only common species, but also those that are endangered, invasive, or elusive. Particular attributes of so-called environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis render it a potent tool for elucidating mechanistic insights in ecological and evolutionary processes. Foremost among these is an improved ability to explore ecosystem-level processes, the generation of quantitative indices for analyses of species, community diversity, and dynamics, and novel opportunities through the use of time-serial samples and unprecedented sensitivity for detecting rare or difficult-to-sample taxa. Although technical challenges remain, here we examine the current frontiers of eDNA, outline key aspects requiring improvement, and suggest future developments and innovations for research. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Next-generation monitoring of aquatic biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding.

              Global biodiversity in freshwater and the oceans is declining at high rates. Reliable tools for assessing and monitoring aquatic biodiversity, especially for rare and secretive species, are important for efficient and timely management. Recent advances in DNA sequencing have provided a new tool for species detection from DNA present in the environment. In this study, we tested whether an environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding approach, using water samples, can be used for addressing significant questions in ecology and conservation. Two key aquatic vertebrate groups were targeted: amphibians and bony fish. The reliability of this method was cautiously validated in silico, in vitro and in situ. When compared with traditional surveys or historical data, eDNA metabarcoding showed a much better detection probability overall. For amphibians, the detection probability with eDNA metabarcoding was 0.97 (CI = 0.90-0.99) vs. 0.58 (CI = 0.50-0.63) for traditional surveys. For fish, in 89% of the studied sites, the number of taxa detected using the eDNA metabarcoding approach was higher or identical to the number detected using traditional methods. We argue that the proposed DNA-based approach has the potential to become the next-generation tool for ecological studies and standardized biodiversity monitoring in a wide range of aquatic ecosystems.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: ValidationRole: Writing – original draft
                Role: MethodologyRole: Validation
                Role: Funding acquisitionRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                17 July 2019
                2019
                : 14
                : 7
                : e0219218
                Affiliations
                [001]Swansea University, Department of Biosciences, Singleton Park, Swansea, Wales, United Kingdom
                University of Hyogo, JAPAN
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                [¤a]

                Current address: Labena d.o.o., BIA Separations CRO, Ljubljana, Slovenia

                [¤b]

                Current address: Centre for Biodiversity Genomics and Department of Integrative Biology, 7 University of Guelph, Guelph, ON Canada

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6364-2751
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4403-2509
                Article
                PONE-D-18-30324
                10.1371/journal.pone.0219218
                6636732
                31314760
                fabb3a67-0c03-4ee6-aa39-18b6b21afa63
                © 2019 Muha et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 19 October 2018
                : 19 June 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 4, Pages: 20
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100007601, Horizon 2020;
                Award ID: 642197
                Award Recipient :
                This work received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Aquainvad-ED project, the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 642197 ( http://www.aquainvad-ed.com/) to SC. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Molecular Biology
                Molecular Biology Techniques
                Artificial Gene Amplification and Extension
                Polymerase Chain Reaction
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Molecular Biology Techniques
                Artificial Gene Amplification and Extension
                Polymerase Chain Reaction
                Biology and life sciences
                Molecular biology
                Molecular biology techniques
                Molecular biology assays and analysis techniques
                DNA filter assay
                Research and analysis methods
                Molecular biology techniques
                Molecular biology assays and analysis techniques
                DNA filter assay
                Research and analysis methods
                Extraction techniques
                DNA extraction
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Precipitation Techniques
                Organic Solvent Precipitation
                Ethanol Precipitation
                Earth Sciences
                Marine and Aquatic Sciences
                Bodies of Water
                Ponds
                Earth Sciences
                Hydrology
                Surface Water
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Body Fluids
                Blood
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anatomy
                Body Fluids
                Blood
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Physiology
                Body Fluids
                Blood
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Physiology
                Body Fluids
                Blood
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Aquatic Environments
                Freshwater Environments
                Fresh Water
                Earth Sciences
                Marine and Aquatic Sciences
                Aquatic Environments
                Freshwater Environments
                Fresh Water
                Custom metadata
                All of the relevant data are within the Supporting Information file.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article