43
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Participação como representação: o impacto das conferências nacionais de políticas públicas no Congresso Nacional Translated title: Participation as representation: the impact of national public policy conferences on the brazilian National Congress

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Translated abstract

          The relationship between representative democracy and participatory and deliberative experiences is not trivial. Those who endorse the discourse of a crisis in political representation sometimes defend participatory and deliberative modalities of democracy as a way of denying the legitimacy of the Legislative Branch, questioning the latter's real capacity to express the people's sovereign will. Still, the emergence of new democratic spaces, as well as new actors involved in the management of the public good, can be seen as a way of strengthening political representation, and not as a sign of weakening in its institutions. The current article defends this argument, seeking to demonstrate that the Brazilian national conferences on public policy have actually provided impetus to the National Congress, thereby strengthening representative democracy in Brazil through a participatory and deliberative practice.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          The Concept of Representation

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Rethinking Representation

            Along with the traditional “promissory” form of representation, empirical political scientists have recently analyzed several new forms, called here “anticipatory,” “gyroscopic,” and “surrogate” representation. None of these more recently recognized forms meets the criteria for democratic accountability developed for promissory representation, yet each generates a set of normative criteria by which it can be judged. These criteria are systemic, in contrast to the dyadic criteria appropriate for promissory representation. They are deliberative rather than aggregative. They are plural rather than singular.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              An Economic Theory of Democracy

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Journal
                s_dados
                Dados
                Dados
                Instituto de Estudos Sociais e Políticos (IESP) - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) (Rio de Janeiro )
                0011-5258
                September 2011
                : 54
                : 3
                : 259-305
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Brazil
                [2 ] Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Brazil
                Article
                S0011-52582011000300002
                10.1590/S0011-52582011000300002
                fad126be-a18c-472f-aee6-20363d96737f

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                national conferences,national congress,democracy,participation,representation,public policies

                Comments

                Comment on this article