15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Microinsert Nonincisional Hysteroscopic Sterilization :

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: findings from the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization.

          Our purpose was to determine the risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization for common methods of tubal occlusion. A multicenter, prospective cohort study was conducted in U.S. medical centers. A total of 10,685 women who underwent tubal sterilization was followed up for 8 to 14 years. The risk of pregnancy was assessed by cumulative life-table probabilities and proportional hazards models. A total of 143 sterilization failures was identified. Cumulative 10-year probabilities of pregnancy were highest after clip sterilization (36.5/1000 procedures) and lowest after unipolar coagulation (7.5/1000) and postpartum partial salpingectomy (7.5/1000). The cumulative risk of pregnancy was highest among women sterilized at a young age with bipolar coagulation (54.3/1000) and clip application (52.1/1000). Although tubal sterilization is highly effective, the risk of sterilization failure is higher than generally reported. The risk persists for years after the procedure and varies by method of tubal occlusion and age.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Tubal sterilization: focus on the U.S. experience

            To review the frequency, effectiveness, and clinical sequelae of tubal sterilization with a focus on the U.S. experience. A review of U.S. health care statistics and English-language literature using a MEDLINE search, bibliographies of key references, and U.S. government publications. Women seeking tubal sterilization. Tubal sterilization. Effectiveness and long-term risks and benefits. Half of the 700,000 annual bilateral tubal sterilizations (TS) are performed postpartum and half as ambulatory interval procedures. Eleven million U.S. women 15-44 years of age rely on TS for contraception. Failure rates vary by method with one third or more resulting in ectopic pregnancy. Reversal is most successful after use of methods that destroy the least tube. Evidence of menstrual or hormonal disturbance after TS is weak, although some studies find higher rates of hysterectomy among previously sterilized women. Decreased risk of subsequent ovarian cancer has been observed among sterilized women. Tubal sterilization is highly effective and safe. Failures, although uncommon, occur at higher rates than previously appreciated. Evidence for hormonal or menstrual changes due to TS is weak. Tubal sterilization is associated with decreased risk of ovarian cancer.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Tubal Sterilization in the United States, 1994-1996

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
                0029-7844
                2003
                July 2003
                : 102
                : 1
                : 59-67
                Article
                10.1097/00006250-200307000-00014
                fafeedbe-73cc-4ded-8080-ba2f1cefc40d
                © 2003
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article