For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
26
views
25
references
 Top references
cited by
0
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    1
    shares
      140
      similar
       All similar

      To submit your manuscript, please click here

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Tailored Occupational Therapist–Led Vocational Intervention for People With Stroke: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Resuming work after stroke is a common goal of working-age adults, yet there are few vocational rehabilitation programs designed to address the unique challenges faced following stroke. The Work intervention was developed to address these gaps.

          Objective

          This paper presents a protocol that outlines the steps that will be undertaken to pilot both the intervention and trial processes for the Work trial.

          Methods

          The Work trial is a 2-arm, prospective, randomized, blinded-assessor study with intention-to-treat analysis. A total of 54 adults of working age who have experienced a stroke <4 months prior will be randomized 1:1 to either (1) an experimental group who will receive a 12-week early vocational intervention (Work intervention) plus usual clinical rehabilitation or (2) a control group who will receive only their usual clinical rehabilitation.

          Results

          Outcomes include study and intervention feasibility and intervention benefit. In addition to evaluating the feasibility of delivering vocational intervention early after stroke, benefit will be assessed by measuring rates of vocational participation and quality-of-life improvements at the 3- and 6-month follow-ups. Process evaluation using data collected during the study, as well as postintervention individual interviews with participants and surveys with trial therapists, will complement quantitative data.

          Conclusions

          The results of the trial will provide details on the feasibility of delivering the Work intervention embedded within the clinical rehabilitation context and inform future trial processes. Pilot data will enable a future definitive trial to determine the clinical effectiveness of vocational rehabilitation when delivered in the early subacute phase of stroke recovery.

          Trial Registration

          Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12619001164189; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=378112&isReview=true

          International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)

          DERR1-10.2196/40548

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The hospital anxiety and depression scale.

          A Zigmond, R P Snaith (1983)
          A self-assessment scale has been developed and found to be a reliable instrument for detecting states of depression and anxiety in the setting of an hospital medical outpatient clinic. The anxiety and depressive subscales are also valid measures of severity of the emotional disorder. It is suggested that the introduction of the scales into general hospital practice would facilitate the large task of detection and management of emotional disorder in patients under investigation and treatment in medical and surgical departments.
          Article 0 comments Cited 2451 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)

            M. Herdman, C. Gudex, S Lloyd … (2011)
            Purpose This article introduces the new 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) health status measure. Methods EQ-5D currently measures health using three levels of severity in five dimensions. A EuroQol Group task force was established to find ways of improving the instrument’s sensitivity and reducing ceiling effects by increasing the number of severity levels. The study was performed in the United Kingdom and Spain. Severity labels for 5 levels in each dimension were identified using response scaling. Focus groups were used to investigate the face and content validity of the new versions, including hypothetical health states generated from those versions. Results Selecting labels at approximately the 25th, 50th, and 75th centiles produced two alternative 5-level versions. Focus group work showed a slight preference for the wording ‘slight-moderate-severe’ problems, with anchors of ‘no problems’ and ‘unable to do’ in the EQ-5D functional dimensions. Similar wording was used in the Pain/Discomfort and Anxiety/Depression dimensions. Hypothetical health states were well understood though participants stressed the need for the internal coherence of health states. Conclusions A 5-level version of the EQ-5D has been developed by the EuroQol Group. Further testing is required to determine whether the new version improves sensitivity and reduces ceiling effects.
            Article 0 comments Cited 2089 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice.

              Susanna Dodd, G Lancaster, Paula Williamson … (2004)
              Pilot studies play an important role in health research, but they can be misused, mistreated and misrepresented. In this paper we focus on pilot studies that are used specifically to plan a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Citing examples from the literature, we provide a methodological framework in which to work, and discuss reasons why a pilot study might be undertaken. A well-conducted pilot study, giving a clear list of aims and objectives within a formal framework will encourage methodological rigour, ensure that the work is scientifically valid and publishable, and will lead to higher quality RCTs. It will also safeguard against pilot studies being conducted simply because of small numbers of available patients.
              Article 0 comments Cited 348 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
                Bookmark
                All references

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Natasha A Lannin:
                ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2066-8345
                Department of NeuroscienceMonash UniversityThe Alfred Centre, Level 699 Commercial RoadMelbourne, 3004Australia61 41 7135 153natasha.lannin@monash.edu
                Journal
                Journal ID (nlm-ta): JMIR Res Protoc
                Journal ID (iso-abbrev): JMIR Res Protoc
                Journal ID (publisher-id): ResProt
                Title: JMIR Research Protocols
                Publisher: JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                ISSN (Electronic): 1929-0748
                Publication date Collection: October 2022
                Publication date (Electronic): 31 October 2022
                Volume: 11
                Issue: 10
                Electronic Location Identifier: e40548
                Affiliations
                [1 ] School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport La Trobe University Melbourne Australia
                [2 ] Department of Occupational Therapy Monash University Frankston Australia
                [3 ] Nottingham University Nottingham United Kingdom
                [4 ] Institute of Clinical Trials Research University of Leeds Leeds United Kingdom
                [5 ] Centre for Ergonomics and Human Factors School of Psychology and Public Health La Trobe University Bundoora Australia
                [6 ] Department of Occupational Therapy Alfred Health Prahran Australia
                [7 ] Department of Neuroscience Monash University Melbourne Australia
                [8 ] Department of Neurology Alfred Health Prahran Australia
                [9 ] Living with Disability Research Centre School of Allied Health La Trobe University Bundoora Australia
                [10 ] School of Medical and Health Science Edith Cowan University Joondalup Australia
                [11 ] Alfred Health Prahran Australia
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Natasha A Lannin natasha.lannin@ 123456monash.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7313-9909
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6246-3180
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2876-0584
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0484-8442
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3457-4438
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8365-6907
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0940-6624
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7958-5181
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2066-8345
                Article
                Publisher ID: v11i10e40548
                DOI: 10.2196/40548
                PMC ID: 9664318
                PubMed ID: 36315220
                SO-VID: fb528621-177e-4e0a-aca6-9d4c9e7a2695
                Copyright statement: ©Sophie O'Keefe, Kathryn Radford, Amanda Farrin, Jodi Oakman, Serena Alves-Stein, Geoffrey Cloud, Jacinta Douglas, Mandy Stanley, Natasha A Lannin. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 31.10.2022.
                License:

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                Date received : 27 June 2022
                Date revision requested : 8 July 2022
                Date revision received : 14 August 2022
                Date accepted : 18 August 2022
                Product
                Self URI: https://www.researchprotocols.org/2022/10/e40548
                Categories
                Subject: Protocol
                Subject: Protocol
                Custom metadata
                ext-peer-rev This paper was peer reviewed by the Stroke Foundation (Melbourne, Australia).

                Keywords: return to work,vocational rehabilitation,acquired brain injury,stroke,traumatic brain injury,neuroscience,rehabilitation,intervention,feasibility,stroke recovery,resume work
                Data availability:
                Keywords: return to work, vocational rehabilitation, acquired brain injury, stroke, traumatic brain injury, neuroscience, rehabilitation, intervention, feasibility, stroke recovery, resume work

                Comments

                Comment on this article