35
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A solution towards a viable compensation mechanism for injury from COVID-19 vaccines in Malaysia: A qualitative study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          It has been established that the existing compensation mechanism is not the favoured platform for vaccine recipients with Adverse Effects Following Immunisation (AEFI). With the mass production of vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic, intensified by the mandatory National COVID-19 Immunisation Programme in Malaysia, an alternative resolution mechanism for compensation is long overdue. This qualitative study aims to propose a viable alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanism for those who suffer AEFI from COVID-19 vaccination, particularly the economically disadvantaged, older people, and disabled individuals in Malaysia.

          Methods

          The researchers conducted an in-depth focus group discussion in September 2022 involving seven participants representing key stakeholders in vaccine compensations from governmental agencies, non-governmental organisations (NGOs), and private institutions who were experts in litigation and legislation, consumer protection, and medical practices in Malaysia. The study utilised ATLAS.ti 22 to conduct a thematic analysis.

          Findings

          The analysis yielded three themes: existing mechanisms and their challenges, the role of ADR, and the solution for a vaccine injury compensation mechanism. The participants shared their knowledge and experience regarding the existing vaccine compensation mechanisms in Malaysia, i.e. the common law of Tort and Consumer Protection Act 1999, and explained how each mechanism relates to specific challenges or arguments that provide the basis on which they are unable to accord fair compensation to the vaccine recipients. The participants debated the merits and disadvantages of the types of ADR for AEFI and unanimously proposed a specific healthcare centre for compensation (SHCC) as the most viable compensation mechanism for AEFI.

          Conclusion

          SHCC offers a new ADR to serve as a compensation mechanism for claimants affected by the COVID-19 vaccines while also contributing to achieving Sustainable Development Goal 16: peace, justice, and strong institutions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references60

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development

            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation

              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Qualitative Methods in Implementation Research: An Introduction

              Qualitative methods are a valuable tool in implementation research because they help to answer complex questions such as how and why efforts to implement best practices may succeed or fail, and how patients and providers experience and make decisions in care. This article orients the novice implementation scientist to fundamentals of qualitative methods and their application in implementation research, describing: 1) implementation-related questions that can be addressed by qualitative methods; 2) qualitative methods commonly used in implementation research; 3) basic sampling and data collection procedures; and 4) recommended practices for data analysis and ensuring rigor. To illustrate qualitative methods decision-making, a case example is provided of a study examining implementation of a primary care-based collaborative care management model for women Veterans with anxiety, depression, and PTSD.

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Heliyon
                Heliyon
                Heliyon
                Elsevier
                2405-8440
                28 January 2024
                15 February 2024
                28 January 2024
                : 10
                : 3
                : e25204
                Affiliations
                [a ]Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030, Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia
                [b ]National University of Malaysia, 43600, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. akmalia.ariff@ 123456umt.edu.my
                Article
                S2405-8440(24)01235-0 e25204
                10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25204
                10850541
                38333837
                fbcb579a-b01a-4067-afb1-0eed24d9d43a
                © 2024 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 21 February 2023
                : 20 January 2024
                : 23 January 2024
                Categories
                Research Article

                vaccine,covid-19,alternative dispute resolution,compensation,aefi

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log