21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Enhanced telomere rejuvenation in pluripotent cells reprogrammed via nuclear transfer relative to induced pluripotent stem cells.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Although somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) and induction of pluripotency (to form iPSCs) are both recognized reprogramming methods, there has been relatively little comparative analysis of the resulting pluripotent cells. Here, we examine the capacity of these two reprogramming approaches to rejuvenate telomeres using late-generation telomerase-deficient (Terc(-/-)) mice that exhibit telomere dysfunction and premature aging. We found that embryonic stem cells established from Terc(-/-) SCNT embryos (Terc(-/-) ntESCs) have greater differentiation potential and self-renewal capacity than Terc(-/-) iPSCs. Remarkably, SCNT results in extensive telomere lengthening in cloned embryos and improved telomere capping function in the established Terc(-/-) ntESCs. In addition, mitochondrial function is severely impaired in Terc(-/-) iPSCs and their differentiated derivatives but significantly improved in Terc(-/-) ntESCs. Thus, our results suggest that SCNT-mediated reprogramming mitigates telomere dysfunction and mitochondrial defects to a greater extent than iPSC-based reprogramming. Understanding the basis of this differential could help optimize reprogramming strategies.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Cell Stem Cell
          Cell stem cell
          1875-9777
          1875-9777
          Jan 2 2014
          : 14
          : 1
          Affiliations
          [1 ] College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094, China; National Institute of Biological Sciences, NIBS, Beijing 102206, China.
          [2 ] National Institute of Biological Sciences, NIBS, Beijing 102206, China.
          [3 ] Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
          [4 ] Leibniz Institute for Age Research, Fritz Lipmann Institute, Jena 07745, Germany.
          [5 ] Institute of Aging Research, School of Medicine, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 310036, China. Electronic address: zhenyuju@163.com.
          [6 ] National Institute of Biological Sciences, NIBS, Beijing 102206, China; School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China. Electronic address: gaoshaorong@tongji.edu.cn.
          Article
          S1934-5909(13)00496-7
          10.1016/j.stem.2013.11.005
          24268696
          fbcf3ae6-f92f-448f-9bfc-a60dbdecd584
          Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article