9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Increased Loss Aversion in Unmedicated Patients with Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) patients show abnormalities in decision-making and, clinically, appear to show heightened sensitivity to potential negative outcomes. Despite the importance of these cognitive processes in OCD, few studies have examined the disorder within an economic decision-making framework. Here, we investigated loss aversion, a key construct in the prospect theory that describes the tendency for individuals to be more sensitive to potential losses than gains when making decisions.

          Methods

          Across two study sites, groups of unmedicated OCD patients ( n = 14), medicated OCD patients ( n = 29), and healthy controls ( n = 34) accepted or rejected a series of 50/50 gambles containing varying loss/gain values. Loss aversion was calculated as the ratio of the likelihood of rejecting a gamble with increasing potential losses to the likelihood of accepting a gamble with increasing potential gains. Decision times to accept or reject were also examined and correlated with loss aversion.

          Results

          Unmedicated OCD patients exhibited significantly more loss aversion compared to medicated OCD or controls, an effect that was replicated across both sites and remained significant even after controlling for OCD symptom severity, trait anxiety, and sex. Post hoc analyses further indicated that unmedicated patients’ increased likelihood to reject a gamble as its loss value increased could not be explained solely by greater risk aversion among patients. Unmedicated patients were also slower to accept than reject gambles, effects that were not found in the other two groups. Loss aversion was correlated with decision times in unmedicated patients but not in the other two groups.

          Discussion

          These data identify abnormalities of decision-making in a subgroup of OCD patients not taking psychotropic medication. The findings help elucidate the cognitive mechanisms of the disorder and suggest that future treatments could aim to target abnormalities of loss/gain processing during decision-making in this population.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty

          Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297-323
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The neural basis of loss aversion in decision-making under risk.

            People typically exhibit greater sensitivity to losses than to equivalent gains when making decisions. We investigated neural correlates of loss aversion while individuals decided whether to accept or reject gambles that offered a 50/50 chance of gaining or losing money. A broad set of areas (including midbrain dopaminergic regions and their targets) showed increasing activity as potential gains increased. Potential losses were represented by decreasing activity in several of these same gain-sensitive areas. Finally, individual differences in behavioral loss aversion were predicted by a measure of neural loss aversion in several regions, including the ventral striatum and prefrontal cortex.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Amygdala damage eliminates monetary loss aversion.

              Losses are a possibility in many risky decisions, and organisms have evolved mechanisms to evaluate and avoid them. Laboratory and field evidence suggests that people often avoid risks with losses even when they might earn a substantially larger gain, a behavioral preference termed "loss aversion." The cautionary brake on behavior known to rely on the amygdala is a plausible candidate mechanism for loss aversion, yet evidence for this idea has so far not been found. We studied two rare individuals with focal bilateral amygdala lesions using a series of experimental economics tasks. To measure individual sensitivity to financial losses we asked participants to play a variety of monetary gambles with possible gains and losses. Although both participants retained a normal ability to respond to changes in the gambles' expected value and risk, they showed a dramatic reduction in loss aversion compared to matched controls. The findings suggest that the amygdala plays a key role in generating loss aversion by inhibiting actions with potentially deleterious outcomes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychiatry
                Front Psychiatry
                Front. Psychiatry
                Frontiers in Psychiatry
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-0640
                15 January 2018
                2017
                : 8
                : 309
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York, NY, United States
                [2] 2Fishberg Department of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Friedman Brain Institute , New York, NY, United States
                [3] 3Department of Psychology, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI, United States
                [4] 4Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Qinghua He, Southwest University, China

                Reviewed by: Qiang Wang, Beijing Normal University, China; Michael Grady Wheaton, Columbia University, United States

                Specialty section: This article was submitted to Psychopathology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychiatry

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00309
                5775273
                29379449
                fbd6cecb-863b-43a6-8abe-a6037b1f1a76
                Copyright © 2018 Sip, Gonzalez, Taylor and Stern.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 08 December 2017
                : 26 December 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 43, Pages: 10, Words: 7958
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute of Mental Health 10.13039/100000025
                Award ID: R01MH111794, R01MH071821
                Categories
                Psychiatry
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                decision-making,prospect theory,choice behavior,reward,obsessive–compulsive disorder

                Comments

                Comment on this article