For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
410
views
19
references
 Top references
cited by
315
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
1
recommends
+1 Recommend
4 collections
    10
    shares
      80
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Investigating Variation in Replicability : A “Many Labs” Replication Project

      research-article
      Author(s): 1 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 1 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 36 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 10 , 6 , 15 , 2 , 16 , 37 , 12 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 7 , 20 , 17 , 21 , 18 , 22 , 23 , 19 , 24 , 3 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 20 , 14 , 3 , 8 , 30 , 15 , 7 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ,   29 , 35
      Publication date (Electronic):
      Journal: Social Psychology
      Publisher: Hogrefe Publishing
      Keywords: replication, reproducibility, generalizability, cross-cultural, variation

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Although replication is a central tenet of science, direct replications are rare in psychology. This research tested variation in the replicability of 13 classic and contemporary effects across 36 independent samples totaling 6,344 participants. In the aggregate, 10 effects replicated consistently. One effect – imagined contact reducing prejudice – showed weak support for replicability. And two effects – flag priming influencing conservatism and currency priming influencing system justification – did not replicate. We compared whether the conditions such as lab versus online or US versus international sample predicted effect magnitudes. By and large they did not. The results of this small sample of effects suggest that replicability is more dependent on the effect itself than on the sample and setting used to investigate the effect.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Complementary justice: effects of "poor but happy" and "poor but honest" stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive.

          Aaron C. Kay, John T. Jost (2003)
          It was hypothesized that exposure to complementary representations of the poor as happier and more honest than the rich would lead to increased support for the status quo. In Study 1, exposure to "poor but happy" and "rich but miserable" stereotype exemplars led people to score higher on a general measure of system justification, compared with people who were exposed to noncomplementary exemplars. Study 2 replicated this effect with "poor but honest" and "rich but dishonest" complementary stereotypes. In Studies 3 and 4, exposure to noncomplementary stereotype exemplars implicitly activated justice concerns, as indicated by faster reaction times to justice-related than neutral words in a lexical decision task. Evidence also suggested that the Protestant work ethic may moderate the effects of stereotype exposure on explicit system justification (but not implicit activation).
          Article 0 comments Cited 276 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Math = male, me = female, therefore math ≠ me.

            Anthony Greenwald, Brian A. Nosek, Mahzarin R. Banaji (2002)
            Article 0 comments Cited 164 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Measures of Anchoring in Estimation Tasks

              K. Jacowitz, D Kahneman (1995)
              Article 0 comments Cited 129 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
                Bookmark
                All references

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal ID (publisher-id): zsp
                Title: Social Psychology
                Publisher: Hogrefe Publishing
                ISSN (Print): 1864-9335
                ISSN (Electronic): 2151-2590
                Publication date (Print): May 2014
                Publication date (Electronic): 2014
                Volume: 45
                Issue: 3
                Pages: 142-152
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
                [ 2 ] University of Padua, Italy
                [ 3 ] The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
                [ 4 ] University of Würzburg, Germany
                [ 5 ] Pennsylvania State University Abington, PA, USA
                [ 6 ] University of Social Sciences and Humanities Campus Sopot, Poland
                [ 7 ] Tilburg University, The Netherlands
                [ 8 ] City University of New York, USA
                [ 9 ] Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
                [ 10 ] University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
                [ 11 ] HELP University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
                [ 12 ] Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
                [ 13 ] San Diego State University, CA, USA
                [ 14 ] Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
                [ 15 ] Mount Saint Vincent University, Nova Scotia, Canada
                [ 16 ] Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [ 17 ] Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
                [ 18 ] Texas A&M University-Commerce, TX, USA
                [ 19 ] Loyola University Chicago, IL, USA
                [ 20 ] Worcester Polytechnic Institute, MA, USA
                [ 21 ] London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
                [ 22 ] James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA, USA
                [ 23 ] Occidental College, Los Angeles, CA, USA
                [ 24 ] McDaniel College, Westminster, MD, USA
                [ 25 ] Connecticut College, New London, CT, USA
                [ 26 ] Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada
                [ 27 ] University of Brasilia, DF, Brazil
                [ 28 ] California State University, Northridge, CA, USA
                [ 29 ] University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
                [ 30 ] University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI, USA
                [ 31 ] Ithaca College, NY, USA
                [ 32 ] Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
                [ 33 ] Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY, USA
                [ 34 ] Washington and Lee University, Lexington, VA, USA
                [ 35 ] Center for Open Science, Charlottesville, VA, USA
                [ 36 ] PRIME Research, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
                [ 37 ] University Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                Author notes
                Richard A. Klein, Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA, raklein@ 123456ufl.edu
                Article
                Apa ID: zsp_45_3_142
                DOI: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000178
                PubMed ID: 36690972
                SO-VID: fbf8da04-33da-4e36-8913-44186fb0a1ff
                History
                Date: March 4, 2013
                Date accepted : November 26, 2013
                Categories
                Subject: Replication

                ScienceOpen disciplines: Assessment, Evaluation & Research methods,Psychology,General social science,General behavioral science
                Keywords: replication,cross-cultural,variation,reproducibility,generalizability
                Data availability:
                ScienceOpen disciplines: Assessment, Evaluation & Research methods, Psychology, General social science, General behavioral science
                Keywords: replication, cross-cultural, variation, reproducibility, generalizability

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content80

                See all similar

                Cited by302

                See all cited by