30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Establishing Normal Ranges of Basal and ACTH-Stimulated Serum Free Cortisol in Children

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Normative data have been established for stimulated serum total cortisol in children but not for serum free cortisol. Methods: Children who were referred for ACTH testing to rule out adrenal insufficiency were enrolled. Only children with normal response and normal androgen levels were included. Total cortisol was determined by a chemiluminescence method, and free cortisol was measured by the same method following equilibrium dialysis. Results: The study group consisted of 85 subjects (28 male; 57 female) with a median age of 8.5 years (range 0.6-17.7). The mean basal and peak total cortisol levels were 11.5 ± 5.7 and 32.9 ± 6.2 μg/dl, respectively. The mean basal and peak free cortisol levels were 0.4 ± 0.3 and 1.8 ± 0.6 μg/dl, respectively. There was a negative correlation between peak total cortisol and age but not between peak free cortisol and age. The 3rd and 97th percentile values for peak free cortisol were 0.94 μg/dl (26 nmol/l) and 2.97 μg/dl (82 nmol/l), respectively. Conclusions: Measurement of free cortisol has the advantage of being independent of cortisol-binding globulin levels. This study provides reference ranges for stimulated free cortisol in children, with a cutoff value of 0.9 μg/dl (25 nmol/l) as a normal response to a standard ACTH test.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Hypothalamic pituitary adrenal function during critical illness: limitations of current assessment methods.

          Activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis represents one of several important responses to stressful events and critical illnesses. Despite a large volume of published data, several controversies continue to be debated, such as the definition of normal adrenal response, the concept of relative adrenal insufficiency, and the use of glucocorticoids in the setting of critical illness. The primary objective was to review some of the modulating factors and limitations of currently used methods of assessing HPA function during critical illness and provide alternative approaches in that setting. This was a critical review of relevant data from the literature with inclusion of previously published as well as unpublished observations by the author. Data on HPA function during three different forms of critical illnesses were reviewed: experimental endotoxemia in healthy volunteers, the response to major surgical procedures in patients with normal HPA, and the spontaneous acute to subacute critical illnesses observed in patients treated in intensive care units. The study was conducted at an academic medical center. Participants were critically ill subjects. There was no intervention. The main measure was to provide data on the superiority of measuring serum free cortisol during critical illness as contrasted to those of total cortisol measurements. Serum free cortisol measurement is the most reliable method to assess adrenal function in critically ill, hypoproteinemic patients. A random serum free cortisol is expected to be 1.8 microg/dl or more in most critically ill patients, irrespective of their serum binding proteins. Because the free cortisol assay is not currently available for routine clinical use, alternative approaches to estimate serum free cortisol can be used. These include calculated free cortisol (Coolens' method) and determining the free cortisol index (ratio of serum cortisol to transcortin concentrations). Preliminary data suggest that salivary cortisol measurements might be another alternative approach to estimating the free cortisol in the circulation. When serum binding proteins (albumin, transcortin) are near normal, measurements of total serum cortisol continue to provide reliable assessment of adrenal function in critically ill patients, in whom a random serum total cortisol would be expected to be 15 microg/dl or more in most patients. In hypoproteinemic critically ill subjects, a random serum total cortisol level is expected to be 9.5 microg/dl or more in most patients. Data on Cosyntropin-stimulated serum total and free cortisol levels should be interpreted with the understanding that the responses in critically ill subjects are higher than those of healthy ambulatory volunteers. The Cosyntropin-induced increment in serum total cortisol should not be used as a criterion for defining adrenal function, especially in critically ill patients. The routine use of glucocorticoids during critical illness is not justified except in patients in whom adrenal insufficiency was properly diagnosed or others who are hypotensive, septic, and unresponsive to standard therapy. When glucocorticoids are used, hydrocortisone should be the drug of choice and should be given at the lowest dose and for the shortest duration possible. The hydrocortisone dose (50 mg every 6 h) that is mistakenly labeled as low-dose hydrocortisone leads to excessive elevation in serum cortisol to values severalfold greater than those achieved in patients with documented normal adrenal function. The latter data should call into question the current practice of using such doses of hydrocortisone even in the adrenally insufficient subjects.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Adrenocorticotropin stimulation test: effects of basal cortisol level, time of day, and suggested new sensitive low dose test.

            Adrenal response to iv administration of 1-24 ACTH (250 micrograms) was examined in normal volunteers under various conditions. The effect of basal cortisol levels was examined by performing the tests at 0800 h with and without pretreatment with dexamethasone. The effect of time of day was evaluated by performing the tests at 0800 h and at 1600 h, eliminating possible basal cortisol influence by pretreatment with dexamethasone. In the first set of tests, despite significantly different baseline levels, 30-min cortisol levels were not different (618 +/- 50 vs. 590 +/- 52 nmol/L). Afternoon cortisol levels in response to ACTH were found to be significantly higher than morning levels at 5 min (254 +/- 50 vs. 144 +/- 36 nmol/L, p less than 0.01) and at 15 min (541 +/- 61 vs. 433 +/- 52 nmol/L, p less than 0.02). This difference in response was no longer notable at 30 min (629 +/- 52 and 591 +/- 52 nmol/L). We tried also to determine the lowest ACTH dose which will elicit a maximal cortisol response. No difference was found in cortisol levels at 30 and 60 min in response to 250 and 5 micrograms 1-24 ACTH. Using 1 micrograms ACTH, the 30-min response did not differ from that to 250 micrograms (704 +/- 72 vs. 718 +/- 55 nmol/L, respectively). However, the 60-min response to 1 microgram was significantly lower (549 +/- 61 vs. 842 +/- 110 nmol/L, p less than 0.01). Using this low dose ACTH test (1 microgram, measuring 30-min cortisol level), we were able to develop a much more sensitive ACTH test, which enabled us to differentiate a subgroup of patients on long-term steroid treatment who responded normally to the regular 250 micrograms test, but had a reduced response to 1 microgram. The stability of 1-24 ACTH in saline solution, kept at 4 C, was checked. ACTH was found to be fully stable after 2 hs in a concentration of 5 micrograms/ml in glass tube and 0.5 micrograms/ml in plastic tube. It was also found to be fully stable, both immunologically and biologically, for 4 months, under these conditions. We conclude that the 30-min cortisol response to ACTH is constant, unrelated to basal cortisol level or time of day. It is therefore the best criterion for measuring adrenal response in the short ACTH test. The higher afternoon responses at 5 and 15 min suggest greater adrenal sensitivity in the afternoon, but further studies are needed to clarify this issue.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Septic shock and sepsis: a comparison of total and free plasma cortisol levels.

              Severe systemic infection leads to hypercortisolism. Reduced cortisol binding proteins may accentuate the free cortisol elevations seen in systemic infection. Recently, low total cortisol increments after tetracosactrin have been associated with increased mortality and hemodynamic responsiveness to exogenous hydrocortisone in septic shock (SS), a phenomenon termed by some investigators as relative adrenal insufficiency (RAI). Free plasma cortisol may correspond more closely to illness severity than total cortisol, comparing SS and sepsis (S). This was a prospective study. This study took place in a tertiary teaching hospital. Patients had SS (n = 45) or S (n = 19) or were healthy controls (HCs; n = 10). The aim of the study was to compare total with free cortisol, measured directly and estimated by Coolens' method, corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG), and albumin in patients with SS (with and without RAI) and S during acute illness, recovery, and convalescence. Comparing SS, S, and HC subjects, free cortisol levels reflected illness severity more closely than total cortisol (basal free cortisol, SS, 186 vs. S, 29 vs. HC, 13 nmol/liter, P < 0.001 compared with basal total cortisol, SS, 880 vs. S, 417 vs. HC, 352 nmol/liter, P < 0.001). Stimulated free cortisol increments varied greatly with illness category (SS, 192 vs. S, 115 vs. HC, 59 nmol/liter, P = 0.004), whereas total cortisol increments did not (SS, 474 vs. S, 576 vs. HC, 524 nmol/liter, P = 0.013). The lack of increase in total cortisol with illness severity is due to lower CBG and albumin. One third of patients with SS (15 of 45) but no S patients met a recently described criterion for RAI (total cortisol increment after tetracosactrin < or = 248 nmol/liter). RAI patients had higher basal total cortisol (1157 vs. 756 nmol/liter; P = 0.028) and basal free cortisol (287 vs. 140 nmol/liter; P = 0.017) than non-RAI patients. Mean cortisol increments in RAI were lower (total, 99 vs. 648 nmol/liter, P < 0.001; free, 59 vs. 252 nmol/liter, P < 0.001). These differences were not due to altered CBG or albumin levels. Free cortisol levels normalized more promptly than total cortisol in convalescence. Calculated free cortisol by Coolens' method compared closely with measured free cortisol. Free cortisol is likely to be a better guide to cortisolemia in systemic infection because it corresponds more closely to illness severity. The attenuated cortisol increment after tetracosactrin in RAI is not due to low cortisol-binding proteins. Free cortisol levels can be determined reliably using total cortisol and CBG levels.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                HRP
                Horm Res Paediatr
                10.1159/issn.1663-2818
                Hormone Research in Paediatrics
                S. Karger AG
                1663-2818
                1663-2826
                2016
                October 2016
                20 July 2016
                : 86
                : 2
                : 94-99
                Affiliations
                aPediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes Unit, Dana-Dwek Children's Hospital and bInstitute of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Hypertension, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, and cSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
                Author notes
                *Dr. Ori Eyal, Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes Unit, Dana-Dwek Children's Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizman Street, Tel Aviv 6423906 (Israel), E-Mail oriey@tlvmc.gov.il
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8030-1588
                Article
                447946 Horm Res Paediatr 2016;86:94-99
                10.1159/000447946
                27437687
                fc2ba2a0-24d6-48a5-8ae7-fa386acd55f4
                © 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 11 April 2016
                : 22 June 2016
                Page count
                Tables: 2, References: 31, Pages: 6
                Categories
                Original Paper

                Endocrinology & Diabetes,Neurology,Nutrition & Dietetics,Sexual medicine,Internal medicine,Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                Free cortisol,Total cortisol,Normal values,ACTH test

                Comments

                Comment on this article