4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Role of Actions of Calcium Antagonists on Efferent Arterioles – with Special References to Glomerular Hypertension

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Although calcium antagonists are used as a first-line antihypertensive agent, controversy attends the renal microvascular effects of calcium antagonists. Since calcium antagonists elicit predominant vasodilation of the afferent arteriole, they might ostensibly aggravate glomerular hypertension. Recently, novel types of calcium antagonists have been developed, some of which are reported to dilate efferent as well as afferent arterioles. The present review attempted to characterize the renal microvascular action of calcium antagonists, and evaluated the consequences of renal injury following the treatment with these antagonists. In contrast to predominant afferent arteriolar action of conventional calcium antagonists (e.g. nifedipine, nicardipine, amlodipine and diltiazem), novel antagonists (e.g. manidipine, nilvadipine, benidipine and efonidipine) potently dilated both afferent and efferent arterioles. The vasodilator action on efferent arterioles appears to be mediated in part by the blockade of T-type calcium channels, particularly through the inhibition of the intracellular calcium release mechanism. The comparison of the anti-proteinuric action of calcium antagonists in subtotally nephrectomized rats showed that efonidipine and enalapril, both possessing vasodilator action on efferent arterioles, exerted more prominent action than other calcium antagonists. Finally, in patients with chronic renal disease, a 48-week treatment with efonidipine reduced proteinuria, and this effect was seen even when the mean arterial blood pressure failed to reach below 100 mm Hg. In conclusion, although calcium antagonists potently inhibit afferent arteriolar constriction, efferent arteriolar responses to these agents vary, depending on the types of calcium antagonists used. These divergent actions of these agents on the efferent arteriole may alter differently the glomerular hemodynamics, and could affect the final outcome of underlying renal diseases.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          N- and L-type calcium channel antagonist improves glomerular dynamics, reverses severe nephrosclerosis, and inhibits apoptosis and proliferation in an l-NAME/SHR model.

          To determine the responses of the new dihydropyridine N- and L-type calcium antagonist, cilnidipine, on systemic and renal hemodynamics, glomerular dynamics, renal function, and histopathology in an Nomega-nitro-l-arginine methylester spontaneously hypertensive rat (l-NAME/SHR) model of nephrosclerosis. Five groups of 20-week-old male SHR were studied using renal micropuncture techniques and histopathological analyses: group 1, control; group 2, cilnidipine (10 mg/kg per day) by gavage, for 3 weeks; group 3, l-NAME (50 mg/l) in drinking water, for 3 weeks; group 4, combination of l-NAME and cilnidipine, for 3 weeks; group 5, l-NAME for 3 weeks, followed by cilnidipine for a subsequent 3 weeks. Cilnidipine significantly reduced mean arterial pressure, total peripheral resistance and renal vascular resistance, while increasing effective renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate (P < 0.01) in l-NAME/SHR. These hemodynamic changes were associated with significantly increased single nephron glomerular filtration rate (SNGFR) and plasma flow (SNPF) and decreased afferent glomerular arteriolar resistances when cilnidipine was used alone, and with increased SNGFR and SNPF, but decreased glomerular capillary pressure, afferent and efferent arteriolar resistances, urinary protein excretion, serum creatinine and uric acid concentrations (at least P < 0.05) in l-NAME-exacerbated SHR nephrosclerosis. In addition, glomerular and arteriolar injuries were markedly reversed (both P < 0.01), and glomerular apoptosis and cellular proliferation were inhibited and associated with glomerular tuft enlargement and an increase in cell number. Cilnidipine not only prevented, but reversed, the severe renal hemodynamic and glomerular dynamic changes, including apoptosis and glomerular cellular proliferation, in l-NAME/SHR-exacerbated nephrosclerosis. This dual-channel calcium antagonist thus exerted renoprotective pathophysiological effects in the l-NAME/SHR.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Differential regulation of elevated renal angiotensin II in chronic renal ischemia.

            The present study was undertaken to clarify the role of intrarenal angiotensin (Ang) II and its generating pathways in clipped and nonclipped kidneys of 4-week unilateral renal artery stenosis in anesthetized dogs. After 4 weeks, renal plasma flow (RPF) decreased in clipped and nonclipped kidneys (baseline, 59+/-3; clipped, 16+/-1; nonclipped, 44+/-2 mL/min; P<0.01, n=22). Renal Ang I levels increased only in clipped, whereas intrarenal Ang II contents were elevated in both clipped (from 0.7+/-0.1 to 2.0+/-0.2 pg/mg tissue) and nonclipped kidneys (from 0.6+/-0.1 to 2.5+/-0.3 pg/mg tissue). Intrarenal ACE activity was increased in nonclipped kidneys but was unaltered in clipped kidneys. An angiotensin receptor antagonist (olmesartan medoxomil) given into the renal artery markedly restored RPF, and dilated both afferent and efferent arterioles (using intravital videomicroscopy). Furthermore, in clipped kidneys, the elevated Ang II was suppressed by a chymase inhibitor, chymostatin (from 2.1+/-0.6 to 0.8+/-0.1 pg/mg tissue; P<0.05), but not by cilazaprilat. In nonclipped kidneys, in contrast, cilazaprilat, but not chymostatin, potently inhibited the intrarenal Ang II generation (from 2.4+/-0.3 to 1.5+/-0.2 pg/mg tissue; P<0.05). Finally, [Pro11-D-Ala12]Ang I (an inactive precursor that yields Ang II by chymase but not by ACE; 1 to 50 nmol/kg) markedly elevated intrarenal Ang II in clipped, but not in nonclipped, kidneys. In conclusion, renal Ang II contents were elevated in both clipped and nonclipped kidneys, which contributed to the altered renal hemodynamics and microvascular tone. Furthermore, the mechanisms for intrarenal Ang II generation differ, and chymase activity is enhanced in clipped kidneys, whereas ACE-mediated Ang II generation is possibly responsible for elevated Ang II contents in nonclipped kidneys.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Divergent renal vasodilator action of L- and T-type calcium antagonists in vivo.

              To assess the in-vivo action on the renal microvasculature of the calcium antagonists nifedipine (L-type blocker), efonidipine (L/T-type blocker), and mibefradil (predominant T-type blocker). An intravital needle-type charge-coupled device (CCD) camera videomicroscope was introduced to visualize the renal microcirculation directly in vivo. In anesthetized mongrel dogs, nifedipine (0.01-1 mg/kg per min), efonidipine (0.033-0.33 mg/kg per min), or mibefradil (0.01-1 mg/kg per min) was infused intravenously after the insertion of a CCD probe into the kidney. Renal microvascular responses to calcium antagonists were directly evaluated, with concomitant observation of renal clearance. Each calcium antagonist caused modest vasodepressor action without affecting heart rate. Nifedipine (1 mg/kg per min, n = 9) increased renal plasma flow (RPF) (14 +/- 4%, P < 0.05) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (19 +/- 5%, P < 0.05), and tended to increase the filtration fraction (5 +/- 2% increment, P = 0.07). Efonidipine (0.33 mg/kg per min, n = 9), however, had no effect on filtration fraction, with 14 +/- 6% increments in RPF (P < 0.05) and 14 +/- 7% increments in GFR (P = 0.08). Rather, mibefradil (1 mg/kg per min, n = 9) elicited 6 +/- 2% decreases in filtration fraction (P < 0.05), with slight increments in RPF (6 +/- 3%) and no changes in GFR. In direct in-vivo microvasculature observations, nifedipine caused predominant (22 +/- 2%) dilatation of afferent arterioles (from 15.5 +/- 0.4 to 18.9 +/- 0.4 microm, n = 5), compared with that of efferent arterioles (10 +/- 2%; from 11.0 +/- 0.4 to 12.1 +/- 0.3 microm). In contrast, efonidipine caused a similar magnitude of vasodilatation (16 +/- 4%) compared with 18 +/- 2%; n = 6), and mibefradil caused greater dilatation of efferent arterioles (20 +/- 4%, n = 7) than that of afferent arterioles (13 +/- 4%). There exists marked heterogeneity in action of nifedipine, efonidipine and mibefradil on the renal microvascular in canine kidneys in vivo. Furthermore, our current observations suggest an important contribution of T-type calcium channel activity to efferent arteriolar tone in vivo.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                AJN
                Am J Nephrol
                10.1159/issn.0250-8095
                American Journal of Nephrology
                S. Karger AG
                0250-8095
                1421-9670
                2003
                August 2003
                31 July 2003
                : 23
                : 4
                : 229-244
                Affiliations
                Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
                Article
                72054 Am J Nephrol 2003;23:229–244
                10.1159/000072054
                12840599
                © 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                Page count
                Figures: 10, Tables: 2, References: 120, Pages: 16
                Product
                Self URI (application/pdf): https://www.karger.com/Article/Pdf/72054
                Categories
                Review Article: In-Depth Topic

                Comments

                Comment on this article