78
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Microplastics in freshwater ecosystems: what we know and what we need to know

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          While the use of plastic materials has generated huge societal benefits, the ‘plastic age’ comes with downsides: One issue of emerging concern is the accumulation of plastics in the aquatic environment. Here, so-called microplastics (MP), fragments smaller than 5 mm, are of special concern because they can be ingested throughout the food web more readily than larger particles. Focusing on freshwater MP, we briefly review the state of the science to identify gaps of knowledge and deduce research needs.

          State of the science

          Environmental scientists started investigating marine (micro)plastics in the early 2000s. Today, a wealth of studies demonstrates that MP have ubiquitously permeated the marine ecosystem, including the polar regions and the deep sea. MP ingestion has been documented for an increasing number of marine species. However, to date, only few studies investigate their biological effects.

          The majority of marine plastics are considered to originate from land-based sources, including surface waters. Although they may be important transport pathways of MP, data from freshwater ecosystems is scarce. So far, only few studies provide evidence for the presence of MP in rivers and lakes. Data on MP uptake by freshwater invertebrates and fish is very limited.

          Knowledge gaps

          While the research on marine MP is more advanced, there are immense gaps of knowledge regarding freshwater MP. Data on their abundance is fragmentary for large and absent for small surface waters. Likewise, relevant sources and the environmental fate remain to be investigated. Data on the biological effects of MP in freshwater species is completely lacking. The accumulation of other freshwater contaminants on MP is of special interest because ingestion might increase the chemical exposure. Again, data is unavailable on this important issue.

          Conclusions

          MP represent freshwater contaminants of emerging concern. However, to assess the environmental risk associated with MP, comprehensive data on their abundance, fate, sources, and biological effects in freshwater ecosystems are needed. Establishing such data critically depends on a collaborative effort by environmental scientists from diverse disciplines (chemistry, hydrology, ecotoxicology, etc.) and, unsurprisingly, on the allocation of sufficient public funding.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Transport and release of chemicals from plastics to the environment and to wildlife.

          Plastics debris in the marine environment, including resin pellets, fragments and microscopic plastic fragments, contain organic contaminants, including polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, petroleum hydrocarbons, organochlorine pesticides (2,2'-bis(p-chlorophenyl)-1,1,1-trichloroethane, hexachlorinated hexanes), polybrominated diphenylethers, alkylphenols and bisphenol A, at concentrations from sub ng g(-1) to microg g(-1). Some of these compounds are added during plastics manufacture, while others adsorb from the surrounding seawater. Concentrations of hydrophobic contaminants adsorbed on plastics showed distinct spatial variations reflecting global pollution patterns. Model calculations and experimental observations consistently show that polyethylene accumulates more organic contaminants than other plastics such as polypropylene and polyvinyl chloride. Both a mathematical model using equilibrium partitioning and experimental data have demonstrated the transfer of contaminants from plastic to organisms. A feeding experiment indicated that PCBs could transfer from contaminated plastics to streaked shearwater chicks. Plasticizers, other plastics additives and constitutional monomers also present potential threats in terrestrial environments because they can leach from waste disposal sites into groundwater and/or surface waters. Leaching and degradation of plasticizers and polymers are complex phenomena dependent on environmental conditions in the landfill and the chemical properties of each additive. Bisphenol A concentrations in leachates from municipal waste disposal sites in tropical Asia ranged from sub microg l(-1) to mg l(-1) and were correlated with the level of economic development.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Ingested microscopic plastic translocates to the circulatory system of the mussel, Mytilus edulis (L).

            Plastics debris is accumulating in the environment and is fragmenting into smaller pieces; as it does, the potential for ingestion by animals increases. The consequences of macroplastic debris for wildlife are well documented, however the impacts of microplastic (< 1 mm) are poorly understood. The mussel, Mytilus edulis, was used to investigate ingestion, translocation, and accumulation of this debris. Initial experiments showed that upon ingestion, microplastic accumulated in the gut. Mussels were subsequently exposed to treatments containing seawater and microplastic (3.0 or 9.6 microm). After transfer to clean conditions, microplastic was tracked in the hemolymph. Particles translocated from the gut to the circulatory system within 3 days and persisted for over 48 days. Abundance of microplastic was greatest after 12 days and declined thereafter. Smaller particles were more abundant than larger particles and our data indicate as plastic fragments into smaller particles, the potential for accumulation in the tissues of an organism increases. The short-term pulse exposure used here did not result in significant biological effects. However, plastics are exceedingly durable and so further work using a wider range of organisms, polymers, and periods of exposure will be required to establish the biological consequences of this debris.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Microplastic pollution in the surface waters of the Laurentian Great Lakes

              Neuston samples were collected at 21 stations during an ~700 nautical mile (~1300 km) expedition in July 2012 in the Laurentian Great Lakes of the United States using a 333 μm mesh manta trawl and analyzed for plastic debris. Although the average abundance was approximately 43,000 microplastic particles/km², station 20, downstream from two major cities, contained over 466,000 particles/km², greater than all other stations combined. SEM analysis determined nearly 20% of particles less than 1 mm, which were initially identified as microplastic by visual observation, were aluminum silicate from coal ash. Many microplastic particles were multi-colored spheres, which were compared to, and are suspected to be, microbeads from consumer products containing microplastic particles of similar size, shape, texture and composition. The presence of microplastics and coal ash in these surface samples, which were most abundant where lake currents converge, are likely from nearby urban effluent and coal burning power plants.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                wagner@bio.uni-frankfurt.de
                scherer@bio.uni-frankfurt.de
                dalvarez@icra.cat
                brennholt@bafg.de
                xavier.bourrain@eau-loire-bretagne.fr
                buchinger@bafg.de
                e.fries@brgm.fr
                cecile.grosbois@univ-tours.fr
                joerg.klasmeier@uos.de
                tmarti@iproma.com
                srodriguez@icra.cat
                rurbatzka@ciimar.up.pt
                dick.vethaak@deltares.nl
                mwn@dhigroup.com
                reifferscheid@bafg.de
                Journal
                Environ Sci Eur
                Environ Sci Eur
                Environmental Sciences Europe
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                2190-4707
                2190-4715
                9 July 2014
                9 July 2014
                2014
                : 26
                : 1
                : 12
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Aquatic Ecotoxicology, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Max-von-Laue-Str. 13, Frankfurt, 60438 Germany
                [2 ]Catalan Institute for Water Research (ICRA), Girona, 17003 Spain
                [3 ]Department Biochemistry and Ecotoxicology, Federal Institute of Hydrology, Koblenz, 56002 Germany
                [4 ]Service Etat des Eaux Evaluation Ecologique, Agence de l’Eau Loire-Bretagne, Ploufragan, 22440 France
                [5 ]Water, Environment and Eco-technologies Division, Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières (BRGM), Orléans, 45100 France
                [6 ]GéoHydrosystèmes Continentaux (GéHCO), Université Francois Rabelais de Tours, Tours, 37000 France
                [7 ]Institute of Environmental Systems Research, Universität Osnabrück, Osnabrück, 49074 Germany
                [8 ]Investigación y Proyectos Medio Ambiente S.L. (IPROMA), Castellón de la Plana, 12005 Spain
                [9 ]Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research (CIIMAR), Porto, 4050-123 Portugal
                [10 ]Unit Marine and Coastal Systems, Deltares and Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1081 The Netherlands
                [11 ]Environment and Toxicology, DHI, Hørsholm, 2970 Denmark
                Article
                12
                10.1186/s12302-014-0012-7
                5566174
                28936382
                fcb8f2d0-bc73-40a0-a00d-eabb830e46d7
                © Wagner et al.; licensee Springer 2014

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.

                History
                : 24 April 2014
                : 16 May 2014
                Categories
                Discussion
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2014

                chemistry,ecotoxicology,environmental quality,litter,microplastics,monitoring,plastics,polymers,review,water framework directive

                Comments

                Comment on this article