28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block versus Continuous Wound Infusion for Post-Caesarean Analgesia: A Randomized Trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To compare the analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block versus Continuous Wound Infusion (CWI) with levobupivacaine after caesarean delivery.

          Methods

          We recruited parturients undergoing elective caesareans for this multicenter study. Following written informed consent, they received a spinal anaesthetic without intrathecal morphine for their caesarean section. The postoperative analgesia was randomized to either a bilateral ultrasound guided TAP block (levobupivicaine = 150 mg) or a CWI through an elastomeric pump for 48 hours (levobupivacaine = 150 mg the first day and 12.5 mg/h thereafter). Every woman received regular analgesics along with oral morphine if required. The primary outcome was comparison of the 48-hour area under the curve (AUC) pain scores. Secondary outcomes included morphine consumption, adverse events, and persistent pain one month postoperatively.

          Results

          Recruitment of 120 women was planned but the study was prematurely terminated due to the occurrence of generalized seizures in one patient of the TAP group. By then, 36 patients with TAP and 29 with CWI had completed the study. AUC of pain at rest and during mobilization were not significantly different: 50 [22.5–80] in TAP versus 50 [27.5–130] in CWI ( P = 0.4) and 190 [130–240] versus 160 [112.5–247.5] ( P = 0.5), respectively. Morphine consumption (0 [0–20] mg in the TAP group and 10 [0–32.5] mg in the CWI group ( P = 0.09)) and persistent pain at one month were similar in both groups (respectively 29.6% and 26.6% (P = 0.73)).

          Conclusion

          In cases of morphine-free spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery, no difference between TAP block and CWI for postoperative analgesia was suggested. TAP block may induce seizures in this specific context. Consequently, such a technique after a caesarean section cannot be recommended.

          Trial Registration

          ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01151943

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Analysis of serial measurements in medical research.

          In medical research data are often collected serially on subjects. The statistical analysis of such data is often inadequate in two ways: it may fail to settle clinically relevant questions and it may be statistically invalid. A commonly used method which compares groups at a series of time points, possibly with t tests, is flawed on both counts. There may, however, be a remedy, which takes the form of a two stage method that uses summary measures. In the first stage a suitable summary of the response in an individual, such as a rate of change or an area under a curve, is identified and calculated for each subject. In the second stage these summary measures are analysed by simple statistical techniques as though they were raw data. The method is statistically valid and likely to be more relevant to the study questions. If this method is borne in mind when the experiment is being planned it should promote studies with enough subjects and sufficient observations at critical times to enable useful conclusions to be drawn. Use of summary measures to analyse serial measurements, though not new, is potentially a useful and simple tool in medical research.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Opioid-induced hyperalgesia: a qualitative systematic review.

            Opioids are the cornerstone therapy for the treatment of moderate to severe pain. Although common concerns regarding the use of opioids include the potential for detrimental side effects, physical dependence, and addiction, accumulating evidence suggests that opioids may yet cause another problem, often referred to as opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Somewhat paradoxically, opioid therapy aiming at alleviating pain may render patients more sensitive to pain and potentially may aggravate their preexisting pain. This review provides a comprehensive summary of basic and clinical research concerning opioid-induced hyperalgesia, suggests a framework for organizing pertinent information, delineates the status quo of our knowledge, identifies potential clinical implications, and discusses future research directions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2014
                5 August 2014
                : 9
                : 8
                : e103971
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Anesthesiology, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France
                [2 ]Department of Anesthesiology, Institut Hospitalier Franco-Britannique, Levallois-Perret, France
                [3 ]Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France
                [4 ]Department of Health Education, Bradford Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, United Kingdom
                Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: MC JFD MF MLG. Performed the experiments: MC AB YB CB VDS BS CF JR MLG. Analyzed the data: YB JFD PAL MF MLG. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JFD. Wrote the paper: YB PAL MF MLG.

                Article
                PONE-D-13-54279
                10.1371/journal.pone.0103971
                4122362
                25093663
                fcd5b224-c8fc-493e-83aa-3d0f316cc8bd
                Copyright @ 2014

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 7 January 2014
                : 2 July 2014
                Page count
                Pages: 6
                Funding
                The authors have no support or funding to report.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anesthesiology
                Anesthesia
                Local and Regional Anesthesia
                Obstetric Anesthesiology
                Clinical Medicine
                Pain Management
                Pharmacology
                Adverse Reactions
                Women's Health
                Maternal Health
                Birth
                Labor and Delivery
                Obstetrics and Gynecology

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article