36
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Building COPD care on shaky ground: a mixed methods study from Swedish primary care professional perspective

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a public health problem. Interprofessional collaboration and health promotion interventions such as exercise training, education, and behaviour change are cost effective, have a good effect on health status, and are recommended in COPD treatment guidelines. There is a gap between the guidelines and the healthcare available to people with COPD.

          The aim of this study was to increase the understanding of what shapes the provision of primary care services to people with COPD and what healthcare is offered to them from the perspective of healthcare professionals and managers.

          Methods

          The study was conducted in primary care in a Swedish county council during January to June 2015. A qualitatively driven mixed methods design was applied. Qualitative and quantitative findings were merged into a joint analysis. Interviews for the qualitative component were performed with healthcare professionals ( n = 14) from two primary care centres and analysed with qualitative content analysis. Two questionnaires were used for the quantitative component; one was answered by senior managers or COPD nurses at primary care centres ( n = 26) in the county council and the other was answered by healthcare professionals ( n = 18) at two primary care centres. The questionnaire data were analysed with descriptive statistics.

          Results

          The analysis gave rise to the overarching theme building COPD care on shaky ground. This represents professionals driven to build a supportive COPD care on ‘shaky’ organisational ground in a fragmented and non-compliant healthcare organisation. The shaky ground is further represented by uninformed patients with a complex disease, which is surrounded with shame. The professionals are autonomous and pragmatic, used to taking responsibility for their work, and with limited involvement of the management. They wish to provide high quality COPD care with interprofessional collaboration, but they lack competence and are hindered by inadequate routines and lack of resources.

          Conclusions

          There is a gap between COPD treatment guidelines and the healthcare that is provided in primary care. To facilitate implementation of the guidelines several actions are needed, such as further training for professionals, additional resources, and improved organisational structure for interprofessional collaboration and patient education.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2393-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

          Widespread application of pulmonary rehabilitation (also known as respiratory rehabilitation) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) should be preceded by demonstrable improvements in function (health-related quality of life, functional and maximal exercise capacity) attributable to the programmes. This review updates the review reported in 2006.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Designing and conducting mixed methods research

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              An Official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Policy Statement: Enhancing Implementation, Use, and Delivery of Pulmonary Rehabilitation.

              Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) has demonstrated physiological, symptom-reducing, psychosocial, and health economic benefits for patients with chronic respiratory diseases, yet it is underutilized worldwide. Insufficient funding, resources, and reimbursement; lack of healthcare professional, payer, and patient awareness and knowledge; and additional patient-related barriers all contribute to the gap between the knowledge of the science and benefits of PR and the actual delivery of PR services to suitable patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                sara.lundell@umu.se
                malin.tistad@umu.se
                borje.rehn@umu.se
                maria.e.wiklund@umu.se
                asa.holmner@vll.se
                karin.wadell@umu.se
                Journal
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Services Research
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6963
                10 July 2017
                10 July 2017
                2017
                : 17
                : 467
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 1034 3451, GRID grid.12650.30, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy, , Umeå University, ; 901 87 Umeå, Sweden
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0304 6002, GRID grid.411953.b, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, , Dalarna University, ; 791 88 Falun, Sweden
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 1034 3451, GRID grid.12650.30, Department of Radiation Sciences, , Umeå University, ; 901 87 Umeå, Sweden
                Article
                2393
                10.1186/s12913-017-2393-y
                5504776
                28693473
                fce42bf5-3d8e-4956-90af-469fb7629bd9
                © The Author(s). 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 6 March 2017
                : 16 June 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: Vetenskapsrådet (SE)
                Award ID: K2014-99X-22572-01-4
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Hjärt-Lungfonden (SE)
                Award ID: 20130331
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Health & Social care
                chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,primary care,healthcare professionals,mixed methods,healthcare system,organisation,implementation,health promotion,treatment guidelines,sweden

                Comments

                Comment on this article