19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Ventilatory requirements for respiratory distress syndrome in small-for-gestational-age infants.

      European Journal of Pediatrics
      Birth Weight, Delivery, Obstetric, Fetal Growth Retardation, physiopathology, Gestational Age, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Small for Gestational Age, Respiration, Artificial, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, therapy

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Neonatal ventilatory requirements and outcome were examined in 135 very preterm, small-for-gestational age (SGA) infants to determine whether fetal growth retardation protects against severe respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in very immature infants. Their results were compared to those from gestational age- and gender-matched controls. Although there was no significant difference in the median duration of mechanical ventilation between the two groups, more SGA infants required ventilation and were ventilated because of RDS. In a subgroup also matched for mode of delivery, there was no significant difference between the proportion of SGA infants requiring mechanical ventilation for RDS compared to their matched controls. The mortality was greater in the SGA group. We conclude that fetal growth retardation does not protect against severe RDS.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article