0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Participation of the 26S Proteasome in the Regulation of Progesterone Receptor Concentrations in the Rat Brain

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The aim of this study was to investigate the participation of the 26S proteasome in the regulation of progesterone receptor (PR) concentrations in the rat brain in vivo. Ovariectomized adult female rats were treated with estradiol (10 µg/100 g s.c.), estradiol + progesterone (400 µg/100 g), and vehicle (corn oil/10% ethanol) in the presence or absence of the proteasome inhibitor Z-Ile-Glu (OBu<sup>1</sup>)-Ala-Leu-H (PSI, 300 µg/100 g). Proteins were extracted from the preoptic area, the hippocampus, and the frontal cortex, and processed for Western blot. Estradiol-induced PR expression in the preoptic area and the hippocampus, whereas progesterone did not modify the effect of estradiol. Neither estradiol nor progesterone modified PR content in the frontal cortex. PSI treatment increased PR content in the preoptic area and the hippocampus. This increase was significant in both regions after 24 h of the treatment with progesterone + PSI in the animals primed with estradiol. In this case, the content of both PR isoforms (PR-A and PR-B) was increased in a similar manner by PSI in the preoptic area (90 and 97%) and in the hippocampus (49 and 50%). PSI did not affect PR content in the frontal cortex. Our results suggest that the 26S proteasome could participate in the turnover of PR in the preoptic area and the hippocampus of the rat in vivo.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 3

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Proteasome-dependent degradation of the human estrogen receptor.

          In eukaryotic cells, the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway is the major mechanism for the targeted degradation of proteins with short half-lives. The covalent attachment of ubiquitin to lysine residues of targeted proteins is a signal for the recognition and rapid degradation by the proteasome, a large multi-subunit protease. In this report, we demonstrate that the human estrogen receptor (ER) protein is rapidly degraded in mammalian cells in an estradiol-dependent manner. The treatment of mammalian cells with the proteasome inhibitor MG132 inhibits activity of the proteasome and blocks ER degradation, suggesting that ER protein is turned over through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. In addition, we show that in vitro ER degradation depends on ubiquitin-activating E1 enzyme (UBA) and ubiquitin-conjugating E2 enzymes (UBCs), and the proteasome inhibitors MG132 and lactacystin block ER protein degradation in vitro. Furthermore, the UBA/UBCs and proteasome inhibitors promote the accumulation of higher molecular weight forms of ER. The UBA and UBCs, which promote ER degradation in vitro, have no significant effect on human progesterone receptor and human thyroid hormone receptor beta proteins.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Phosphorylation of human progesterone receptors at serine-294 by mitogen-activated protein kinase signals their degradation by the 26S proteasome.

            Ligand-dependent down-regulation that leads to rapid and extensive loss of protein is characteristic of several nuclear steroid receptors, including human progesterone receptors (PRs). In breast cancer cells, >95% of PRs are degraded 6 h after the start of progestin treatment. The mechanism for down-regulation is unknown. We examined the role of PR phosphorylation by mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) in this process. Lactacystin and calpain inhibitor I, specific inhibitors of the 26S proteasome, blocked progestin-induced down-regulation, and ubiquitinated conjugates of PR accumulated in cells. Ligand-dependent PR degradation was also blocked by specific inhibition of p42 and p44 MAPKs. To define the targets of phosphorylation by this kinase, two serine/proline MAPK consensus sites on PR were mutated. We demonstrate that mutation of PR serine-294 to alanine (S294A) specifically and completely prevents ligand-dependent receptor down-regulation. We also find that rapid, ligand-independent degradation of immature PR intermediates occurs by a proteasome-mediated pathway. These results demonstrate that PR destruction, by either of two alternate routes, is mediated by the 26S proteasome. Specifically, down-regulation of mature PRs occurs by a mechanism in which ligand binding activates PR phosphorylation by MAPKs at a unique serine residue, which then targets the receptors for degradation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Transcriptional hyperactivity of human progesterone receptors is coupled to their ligand-dependent down-regulation by mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent phosphorylation of serine 294.

              Breast cancers often exhibit elevated expression of tyrosine kinase growth factor receptors; these pathways influence breast cancer cell growth in part by targeting steroid hormone receptors, including progesterone receptors (PR). To mimic activation of molecules downstream of growth factor-initiated signaling pathways, we overexpressed mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK; also known as extracellular signal-regulated kinase) kinase kinase 1 (MEKK1) in T47D human breast cancer cells expressing the B isoform of PR. MEKK1 is a strong activator of p42 and p44 MAPKs. MEKK1 expression increased progestin-mediated transcription 8- to 10-fold above normal PR-driven transcription levels. This was dependent on the presence of a progesterone response element and functional PR. PR protein levels were unchanged by MEKK1 alone but were extensively down-regulated by MEKK1 plus the progestin R5020. MEKK1 expression resulted in phosphorylation of PR on Ser294, a MAPK consensus site known to mediate ligand-dependent PR degradation. MEK inhibitors blocked phosphorylation of Ser294 and attenuated PR transcriptional hyperactivity in response to MEKK1 plus R5020; stabilization of PR by inhibition of the 26S proteasome produced similar results. T47D cells stably expressing mutant S294A PR, in which serine 294 is replaced by alanine, fail to undergo ligand-dependent down-regulation and are resistant to MEKK1-plus-R5020-induced transcriptional synergy but respond to progestins alone. Similarly, c-myc protein levels are synergistically increased by epidermal growth factor and R5020 in cells expressing wild-type PR, but not S294A PR. Thus, highly stable mutant PR are functional in response to progestins but are incapable of cross talk with MAPK-driven pathways. These studies demonstrate a paradoxical coupling between steroid receptor down-regulation and transcriptional hyperactivity. They also suggest a link between phosphorylation of PR by MAPKs in response to peptide growth factor signaling and steroid hormone control of breast cancer cell growth.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                NEN
                Neuroendocrinology
                10.1159/issn.0028-3835
                Neuroendocrinology
                S. Karger AG
                0028-3835
                1423-0194
                2002
                November 2002
                02 December 2002
                : 76
                : 5
                : 267-271
                Affiliations
                Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, D.F., México
                Article
                66623 Neuroendocrinology 2002;76:267–271
                10.1159/000066623
                12457037
                © 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                Page count
                Figures: 2, References: 22, Pages: 5
                Categories
                Rapid Communication

                Comments

                Comment on this article