Blog
About

1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Phosphate Kinetics during Different Dialysis Modalities

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: An abnormal serum phosphate concentration is common in acute renal failure patients, with a reported incidence of 65–80%. Phosphate removal and kinetics during intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) have been investigated, but there is no information on its kinetics during slow low-efficiency dialysis (SLED) and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Methods: Eight IHD, 8 SLED, and 10 continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) patients with a residual renal clearance of <4.0 ml/min were studied during a single treatment to evaluate phosphate removal and kinetics. CVVH was studied the first 24 h after initiation. Dialysis/replacement fluid contained no phosphate. Kt/V, clearance of urea (Ku), inorganic phosphate (Kp) and solute removal was determined by direct dialysate quantification (DDQ). Results: Kp recorded with the three techniques were: IHD, 126.9 ± 18.4 ml/min; SLED, 58.0 ± 15.8 ml/min, and CVVH, 31.5 ± 6.0 ml/min. However, in shorter dialysis treatment the total removal of phosphate was significantly lower than in longer dialysis (IHD, 29.9 ± 7.7 mmol; SLED, 37.6 ± 9.6 mmol; CVVH, 66.7 ± 18.9 mmol, p = 0.001). The duration of treatment is the only factor determining phosphate removal (r = 0.7, p < 0.0001 by linear correlation model). Like IHD, phosphate kinetics during SLED could not be explained by the two-pool kinetic model, and the rebound of phosphate extended beyond 1 h after dialysis. Rebound, however, is less marked than in short dialysis. Conclusion: These results are reliable evidence about amount of phosphate removal and behavior of intradialytic phosphate kinetics in renal failure patients undergoing different dialysis modalities. These data will help clinicians plan phosphate supplementation and treatment intensity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Control of serum phosphate without any phosphate binders in patients treated with nocturnal hemodialysis.

          We compared the efficacy and the long-term effects of nocturnal hemodialysis (NHD) versus conventional hemodialysis (CHD) in controlling serum phosphate levels in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Patients underwent thrice weekly CHD and were subsequently switched to NHD six nights weekly. In the "acute" study serum and dialysate phosphate were measured during and after dialysis, and the total dialysate was collected to calculate mass solute removal. Although pre-dialysis (1.7 +/- 0.6 vs. 1.5 +/- 0.8 mM) serum phosphate levels were similar in CHD and NHD, respectively, post-dialysis levels were slightly lower with CHD (0.7 +/- 0.2 vs. 0.8 +/- 0.2 mM, P < 0.05). The measured phosphate removed per session of CHD or NHD was comparable, 25.3 +/- 7.5 versus 26.9 +/- 9.8 mumol/session, respectively. On the other hand, the cumulative weekly phosphate removal was significantly higher with NHD as compared to CHD, 75.8 +/- 22.5 versus 161.6 +/- 59.0 mumol/week (P < 0.01). In the "chronic" study serum phosphate levels were measured monthly for five months on CHD and for five months after the patients were switched to NHD. Dietary phosphate intake and the dosage of phosphate binders were tabulated. Serum phosphate levels fell during NHD: 2.1 +/- 0.5 mM at the beginning of the study and 1.3 +/- 0.2 mM five months after being switched to NHD (P < 0.001). At the same time dietary phosphate intake increased by 50%. By the fourth month of NHD therapy none of the patients was taking any phosphate binders. In conclusion, NHD is more effective in controlling serum phosphate levels than CHD, allowing patients to discontinue their phosphate binders completely and to ingest a more liberal diet.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Extended daily dialysis: A new approach to renal replacement for acute renal failure in the intensive care unit.

            Continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) is an effective form of renal replacement therapy for acute renal failure (ARF) that offers greater hemodynamic stability and better volume control than conventional hemodialysis in the critically ill, hypotensive patient. However, the application of CVVH in the intensive care unit (ICU) has several disadvantages, including intensive nursing requirements, continuous anticoagulation, patient immobility, and expense. We describe a new approach to the treatment of ARF in the ICU, which we have termed extended daily dialysis (EDD). In this study, EDD was compared with CVVH in 42 patients: 25 patients were treated with EDD for a total of 367 treatment days, and 17 patients were treated with CVVH for a total of 113 days. Median treatment time per day was 7.5 hours for EDD (range, 6 to 8 hours, 25th to 75th percentile) versus 19.5 hours for CVVH (range, 13.4 to 24 hours; P < 0.001). Mean arterial blood pressures (MAPs) did not differ significantly for patients treated with EDD when measured predialysis (median MAP, 70 versus 67 mm Hg for CVVH; P = 0.078), midway through daily treatment (70 versus 68 mm Hg for CVVH; P = 0.083), or at the end of treatment (71 versus 69 mm Hg for CVVH; P = 0.07). Net daily ultrafiltration was similar for the two treatment modalities (EDD, median, 3,000 mL/d; range, 1,763 to 4,445 mL/d; CVVH, 3,028 mL/d; range, 1,785 to 4,707 mL/d; P = 0.514). Anticoagulation requirements were significantly less for patients treated with EDD (median dose of heparin, 4,000 U/d; range, 0 to 5,800 U/d versus 21,100 U/d; range, 8,825 to 31,275 U/d for patients treated with CVVH; P < 0.001). We found that EDD eliminated the need for constant supervision of the dialysis machine by a subspecialty dialysis nurse, allowing one nurse to manage more than one treatment. Overall, EDD was well tolerated by the majority of patients, offered many of the same benefits provided by CVVH, and was technically easier to perform.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Phosphate kinetics during hemodialysis: Evidence for biphasic regulation.

              Hyperphosphatemia in the hemodialysis population is ubiquitous, but phosphate kinetics during hemodialysis is poorly understood. Twenty-nine hemodialysis patients each received one long and one short dialysis, equivalent in terms of urea clearance. Phosphate concentrations were measured during each treatment and for one hour thereafter. A new model of phosphate kinetics was developed and implemented in VisSim. This model characterized additional processes involved in phosphate kinetics explaining the departure of the measured data from a standard two-pool model. Pre-dialysis phosphate concentrations were similar in long and short dialysis groups. Post-dialysis phosphate concentrations in long dialysis were higher than in short dialysis (P < 0.02) despite removal of a greater mass of phosphate (P < 0.001). In both long and short dialysis serum phosphate concentrations initially fell in accordance with two-pool kinetics, but thereafter plateaued or increased despite continuing phosphate removal. Implementation of an additional regulatory mechanism such that a third pool liberates phosphate to maintain an intrinsic target concentration (1.18 +/- 0.06 mmol/L; 95% confidence intervals, CI) explained the data in 24% of treatments. The further addition of a fourth pool hysteresis element triggered by critically low phosphate levels (0.80 +/- 0.07 mmol/L, CI) yielded an excellent correlation with the observed data in the remaining 76% of treatments (cumulative standard deviation 0.027 +/- 0.004 mmol/L, CI). The critically low concentration correlated with pre-dialysis phosphate levels (r=0.67, P < 0.0001). Modeling of phosphate kinetics during hemodialysis implies regulation involving up to four phosphate pools. The accuracy of this model suggests that the proposed mechanisms have physiological validity.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BPU
                Blood Purif
                10.1159/issn.0253-5068
                Blood Purification
                S. Karger AG
                978-3-8055-7885-1
                978-3-318-01188-3
                0253-5068
                1421-9735
                2005
                December 2004
                07 February 2011
                : 23
                : 1
                : 83-90
                Affiliations
                Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, St Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
                Article
                82016 Blood Purif 2005;23:83–90
                10.1159/000082016
                15627742
                © 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 2, References: 28, Pages: 8
                Product
                Self URI (application/pdf): https://www.karger.com/Article/Pdf/82016
                Categories
                Paper

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Similar content 35

                Cited by 9

                Most referenced authors 177