Blog
About

  • Record: found
  • Abstract: found
  • Article: not found

A randomized, controlled trial of the use of pulmonary-artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients.

The New England journal of medicine

Treatment Outcome, Aged, Catheterization, Swan-Ganz, adverse effects, Elective Surgical Procedures, mortality, Female, Hospital Mortality, Humans, Intensive Care, methods, Male, Middle Aged, Perioperative Care, Pulmonary Embolism, etiology, Risk Factors, Surgical Procedures, Operative, Survival Rate

Read this article at

ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
Bookmark
      There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

      Abstract

      Some observational studies suggest that the use of pulmonary-artery catheters to guide therapy is associated with increased mortality. We performed a randomized trial comparing goal-directed therapy guided by a pulmonary-artery catheter with standard care without the use of a pulmonary-artery catheter. The subjects were high-risk patients 60 years of age or older, with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class III or IV risk, who were scheduled for urgent or elective major surgery, followed by a stay in an intensive care unit. Outcomes were adjudicated by observers who were unaware of the treatment-group assignments. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality from any cause. Of 3803 eligible patients, 1994 (52.4 percent) underwent randomization. The base-line characteristics of the two treatment groups were similar. A total of 77 of 997 patients who underwent surgery without the use of a pulmonary-artery catheter (7.7 percent) died in the hospital, as compared with 78 of 997 patients in whom a pulmonary-artery catheter was used (7.8 percent)--a difference of 0.1 percentage point (95 percent confidence interval, -2.3 to 2.5). There was a higher rate of pulmonary embolism in the catheter group than in the standard-care group (8 events vs. 0 events, P=0.004). The survival rates at 6 months among patients in the standard-care and catheter groups were 88.1 and 87.4 percent, respectively (difference, -0.7 percentage point [95 percent confidence interval, -3.6 to 2.2]; negative survival differences favor standard care); at 12 months, the rates were 83.9 and 83.0 percent, respectively (difference, -0.9 percentage point [95 percent confidence interval, -4.3 to 2.4]). The median hospital stay was 10 days in each group. We found no benefit to therapy directed by pulmonary-artery catheter over standard care in elderly, high-risk surgical patients requiring intensive care. Copyright 2003 Massachusetts Medical Society

      Related collections

      Author and article information

      Journal
      10.1056/NEJMoa021108
      12510037

      Comments

      Comment on this article