26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      To submit to Bentham Journals, please click here

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Detecting IOP Fluctuations in Glaucoma Patients

      research-article
      1 , * , 2 , 3
      The Open Ophthalmology Journal
      Bentham Open
      24-h IOP monitoring, fluctuations, intraocular pressure, laucoma

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) remains the guiding principle of glaucoma management. Although IOP is the only treatable risk factor, its 24-hour behavior is poorly understood. Current glaucoma management usually relies on single IOP measurements during clinic hours, even though IOP is a dynamic parameter with rhythms dependent on individual patients. It has further been shown that most glaucoma patients have their highest IOP measurements outside clinic hours. The fact that these IOP peaks go largely undetected may explain why certain patients progress in their disease despite treatment. Nevertheless, single IOP measurements have determined all major clinical guidelines regarding glaucoma treatment. Other potentially informative parameters, such as fluctuations in IOP and peak IOP, have been neglected, and effects of IOP-lowering interventions on such measures are largely unknown. Continuous 24-hour IOP monitoring has been an interest for more than 50 years, but only recent technological advances have provided clinicians with a device for such an endeavor. This review discusses current uses and shortcomings of current measurement techniques, and provides an overview on current and future methods for 24-hour IOP assessment. It may be possible to incorporate continuous IOP monitoring into clinical practice, potentially to reduce glaucoma-related vision loss.

          Related collections

          Most cited references90

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002.

          This paper presents estimates of the prevalence of visual impairment and its causes in 2002, based on the best available evidence derived from recent studies. Estimates were determined from data on low vision and blindness as defined in the International statistical classification of diseases, injuries and causes of death, 10th revision. The number of people with visual impairment worldwide in 2002 was in excess of 161 million, of whom about 37 million were blind. The burden of visual impairment is not distributed uniformly throughout the world: the least developed regions carry the largest share. Visual impairment is also unequally distributed across age groups, being largely confined to adults 50 years of age and older. A distribution imbalance is also found with regard to gender throughout the world: females have a significantly higher risk of having visual impairment than males. Notwithstanding the progress in surgical intervention that has been made in many countries over the last few decades, cataract remains the leading cause of visual impairment in all regions of the world, except in the most developed countries. Other major causes of visual impairment are, in order of importance, glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy and trachoma.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Intraocular pressure fluctuation a risk factor for visual field progression at low intraocular pressures in the advanced glaucoma intervention study.

            To investigate the relationship of intraocular pressure (IOP) fluctuation and mean IOP to visual field (VF) progression in patients enrolled in the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS). Retrospective analysis of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Three hundred one eyes of 301 patients enrolled in the AGIS were included. Eyes with more than one surgical intervention were excluded. Worsening of the VF was detected with pointwise linear regression. Long-term IOP fluctuation was defined as the standard deviation of IOP (millimeters of mercury) at all visits after initial intervention until the time of VF worsening or end of follow-up, whichever came first. A multivariate linear regression model was performed to identify predictors of VF progression. Terciles of mean IOP were identified, and the average IOP fluctuation in each stratum was calculated. Terciles of long-term IOP fluctuation were similarly evaluated. The proportion of eyes showing VF progression in each stratum was determined and compared. Visual field progression. Visual field progression was detected in 78 eyes (26%). There were statistically significant differences, between progressing and nonprogressing eyes, for mean IOP (P = 0.006), IOP fluctuation (P<0.001), mean length of follow-up (P = 0.013), mean number of VFs (P = 0.005), and mean number of medications (P = 0.006). Three variables were associated with a higher probability of VF progression: greater IOP fluctuation (P = 0.009), argon laser trabeculoplasty (P = 0.004), and older age (P = 0.05). In this model, mean IOP was of borderline statistical significance (P = 0.09). Within the lower and upper terciles of mean IOP, IOP fluctuation was associated with VF progression in the low mean IOP group (P = 0.002) but not in the high mean IOP group (P = 0.2). When subjects were stratified according to IOP fluctuation, there was a statistically significant difference between lower and upper terciles of IOP fluctuation with respect to progression (P = 0.05). There was a weak correlation between mean IOP and IOP fluctuation (r(2) = 0.025, P = 0.01). In the AGIS, long-term IOP fluctuation is associated with VF progression in patients with low mean IOP but not in patients with high mean IOP.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis associated with glaucoma damage.

              We sought to measure the impact of central corneal thickness (CCT), a possible risk factor for glaucoma damage, and corneal hysteresis, a proposed measure of corneal resistance to deformation, on various indicators of glaucoma damage. Observational study. Adult patients of the Wilmer Glaucoma Service underwent measurement of hysteresis on the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer and measurement of CCT by ultrasonic pachymetry. Two glaucoma specialists (H.A.Q., N.G.C.) reviewed the chart to determine highest known intraocular pressure (IOP), target IOP, diagnosis, years with glaucoma, cup-to-disk ratio (CDR), mean defect (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), glaucoma hemifield test (GHT), and presence or absence of visual field progression. Among 230 subjects, the mean age was 65 +/- 14 years, 127 (55%) were female, 161 (70%) were white, and 194 (85%) had a diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or suspected POAG. In multivariate generalized estimating equation models, lower corneal hysteresis value (P = .03), but not CCT, was associated with visual field progression. When axial length was included in the model, hysteresis was not a significant risk factor (P = .09). A thinner CCT (P = .02), but not hysteresis, was associated with a higher CDR at the most recent examination. Neither CCT nor hysteresis was associated with MD, PSD, or GHT "outside normal limits." Thinner CCT was associated with the state of glaucoma damage as indicated by CDR. Axial length and corneal hysteresis were associated with progressive field worsening.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Open Ophthalmol J
                Open Ophthalmol J
                TOOPHTJ
                The Open Ophthalmology Journal
                Bentham Open
                1874-3641
                29 February 2016
                2016
                : 10
                : 44-55
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Hamilton Glaucoma Center and Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
                [2 ]Glaucoma Center, Montchoisi Clinic, Genolier Swiss Vision Network, Lausanne, Switzerland
                [3 ]Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
                Author notes
                [* ]Address correspondence to this author at the Glaucoma Center, Montchoisi Clinic, Genolier Swiss Vision Network, Chemin des Allinges 16, Chemin des Allinges 16, CH-1006 Lausanne, Switzerland; Tel: +41 21 619 37 42; Fax: +41 21 619 36 28, +41 21 619 37 42, 41 21 619 36 28; E-mail: kawehm@ 123456yahoo.com
                Article
                TOOPHTJ-10-44
                10.2174/1874364101610010044
                4780505
                27014387
                fde0895b-57c8-4d15-b6ed-71ca2d0aade7
                © Nuyen and Mansouri; Licensee Bentham Open.

                This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode), which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.

                History
                : 26 July 2015
                : 18 August 2015
                : 18 August 2015
                Categories
                Article
                Suppl 1: M3

                Ophthalmology & Optometry
                24-h iop monitoring,fluctuations,intraocular pressure,laucoma
                Ophthalmology & Optometry
                24-h iop monitoring, fluctuations, intraocular pressure, laucoma

                Comments

                Comment on this article