21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Optimal timing and route of nutritional support after esophagectomy: A review of the literature

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Some controversy surrounds the postoperative feeding regimen utilized in patients who undergo esophagectomy. Variation in practices during the perioperative period exists including the type of nutrition started, the delivery route, and its timing. Adequate nutrition is essential for this patient population as these patients often present with weight loss and have altered eating patterns after surgery, which can affect their ability to regain or maintain weight. Methods of feeding after an esophagectomy include total parenteral nutrition, nasoduodenal/nasojejunal tube feeding, jejunostomy tube feeding, and oral feeding. Recent evidence suggests that early oral feeding is associated with shorter LOS, faster return of bowel function, and improved quality of life. Enhanced recovery pathways after surgery pathways after esophagectomy with a component of early oral feeding also seem to be safe, feasible, and cost-effective, albeit with limited data. However, data on anastomotic leaks is mixed, and some studies suggest that the incidence of leaks may be higher with early oral feeding. This risk of anastomotic leak with early feeding may be heavily modulated by surgical approach. No definitive data is currently available to definitively answer this question, and further studies should look at how these early feeding regimens vary by surgical technique. This review aims to discuss the existing literature on the optimal route and timing of feeding after esophagectomy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Cervical or Thoracic Anastomosis after Esophagectomy for Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

          Background: Cervical anastomosis and thoracic anastomosis are used for gastric tube reconstruction after esophagectomy for cancer. This systematic review was conducted in order to identify randomized trials that compare cervical with thoracic anastomosis. Methods: A literature search for randomized trials was performed in the following databases: Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library. Results: A total of 4 trials were included. All studies had a small sample size and were of moderate quality. One trial was excluded from the meta-analysis. The following outcomes were significantly associated with a cervical anastomosis: recurrent laryngeal nerve trauma (OR: 7.14; 95% CI: 1.75–29.14; p = 0.006) and anastomotic leakage (OR: 3.43; 95% CI: 1.09–10.78; p = 0.03). None of the following outcomes were associated with the location of the anastomosis: pulmonary complications (OR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.13–5.59; p = 0.87), perioperative mortality (OR: 1.24; 95% CI: 0.35–4.41; p = 0.74), benign stricture formation (OR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.17–3.87; p = 0.79) or tumor recurrence (OR: 2.01; 95% CI: 0.68–5.91; p = 0.21). Conclusion: Cervical anastomosis could be associated with a higher leak rate and recurrent nerve trauma. However, the currently available randomized evidence is limited. Further randomized trials are needed to provide sufficient evidence for the preferred location of the anastomosis after esophagectomy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Allowing normal food at will after major upper gastrointestinal surgery does not increase morbidity: a randomized multicenter trial.

            The aim of this trial was to investigate whether a routine of allowing normal food at will increases morbidity after major upper gastrointestinal (GI) surgery. Nil-by-mouth with enteral tube feeding is widely practiced for several days after major upper GI surgery. After other abdominal operations, normal food at will has been shown to be safe and to improve gut function. Patients were randomly assigned to a routine of nil-by-mouth and enteral tube feeding by needle-catheter jejunostomy (ETF group) or normal food at will from the first day after major upper GI surgery. Primary end point was rate of major complications and death. Secondary outcomes were minor complications and adverse events, bowel function, and length of stay. All patients were invited to a follow-up at 8 weeks after discharge from the hospital. Four hundred fifty-three patients who underwent major open upper GI surgery in 5 centers were enrolled between 2001 and 2006. Four hundred forty-seven patients were correctly randomized. Of 227 patients 76 (33.5%) had major complications in the ETF group compared with 62 (28.2%) of 220 patients allowed normal food at will (P = 0.26, 95% CI for the difference in rate from -3.3 to 13.9). In the ETF group, 36 (15.9%) patients were reoperated compared with 29 (13.2%) in the group allowed normal food at will (P = 0.50) and 30-day mortality was 10 (4.4%) of 227 and 11 (5.0%) of 220 patients, respectively (P = 0.83). Time to resumed bowel function was significantly in favor of allowing normal food at will (P = 0.01), as were the total number of major complications, length of stay, and rate of postdischarge complications. Allowing patients to eat normal food at will from the first day after major upper GI surgery does not increase morbidity compared with traditional care with nil-by-mouth and enteral feeding.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Early postoperative enteral nutrition improves gut oxygenation and reduces costs compared with total parenteral nutrition.

              To evaluate the potential clinical, metabolic, and economic advantages of enteral nutrition over total parenteral nutrition. Prospective, randomized clinical trial. Department of surgery in a university hospital. Two hundred and fifty-seven patients with cancer of the stomach (n = 121), pancreas (n = 110), or esophagus (n = 26) were randomized to receive postoperative total parenteral nutrition (TPN group, n = 131) or early enteral nutrition (EEN group, n = 126). The nutritional goal was 25 kcal/kg/day. The two nutritional formulas were isocaloric and isonitrogenous, and they were continued until oral intake was at least 800 kcal/day. Morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay, and treatment costs were evaluated in all patients. In 40 consecutive patients, selected nutritional, immunologic and inflammatory variables were studied. Moreover, intestinal oxygen tension was evaluated by micropolarographic implantable probes. The nutritional goal was reached in 100/126 (79.3%) patients in the EEN group and in 128/131 (97.7%) patients in the TPN group (p 200 mg/dL) was observed in 4.7% of the patients vs. 9.1% in the TPN group (p = NS). Alteration of serum electrolyte levels was 3.9% in the EEN group vs. 13.7% in the TPN group (p <.01). No significant difference was found in nutritional, immunologic, and inflammatory variables between the two groups. The overall complication rate was similar (40.4% for TPN vs. 35.7%, for EEN; p =.52). No difference was detected for either infectious or noninfectious complications, length of hospital stay, and mortality. From postoperative day 5, intestinal oxygen tension recovered faster in the EEN group than in the TPN group (43 +/- 5 mm Hg vs. 31 +/- 4 mm Hg at day 7; p <.001). EEN was four-fold less expensive than TPN ($25 vs. $90.60/day, respectively). EEN represents a rational alternative to TPN in patients who undergo upper gastrointestinal tract surgery for cancer and who clinically require postoperative artificial nutrition.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                World J Gastroenterol
                World J. Gastroenterol
                WJG
                World Journal of Gastroenterology
                Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
                1007-9327
                2219-2840
                21 August 2019
                21 August 2019
                : 25
                : 31
                : 4427-4436
                Affiliations
                Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital. Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia University and Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, United States
                Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital. Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia University and Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, United States
                Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital. Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia University and Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, United States
                Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital. Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia University and Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, United States
                Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital. Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia University and Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, United States
                Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital. Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia University and Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, United States, francesco.palazzo@ 123456jefferson.edu
                Author notes

                Author contributions: All authors equally contributed to this paper with conception and design of the study, literature review and analysis, drafting, critical revision, editing, and approval of the final version.

                Corresponding author: Francesco Palazzo, FACS, MD, Assistant Professor, Doctor, Surgeon, Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia University and Thomas Jefferson University, 1100 Walnut St, 5th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19107, United States. francesco.palazzo@ 123456jefferson.edu

                Telephone: +1-215-5510360 Fax: +1-215-5518725

                Article
                jWJG.v25.i31.pg4427
                10.3748/wjg.v25.i31.4427
                6710171
                31496622
                fe1ec4e1-c705-4d66-8718-31f9ae1e149c
                ©The Author(s) 2019. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

                This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.

                History
                : 9 May 2019
                : 9 July 2019
                : 19 July 2019
                Categories
                Minireviews

                esophagectomy,oral feeding,early feeding,delayed feeding,enteral nutrition,esophageal cancer,jejunostomy tube,postoperative complications

                Comments

                Comment on this article