32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      How best to engage patients, doctors, and other stakeholders in designing comparative effectiveness studies.

      Health affairs (Project Hope)
      Comparative Effectiveness Research, organization & administration, Humans, Patient Participation, Physician's Role, Physicians, Research Design, United States

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Having patients, doctors, health plan managers, hospital executives, and other stakeholders participate in the design of comparative effectiveness studies can ensure that this vital research focuses on the evidence gaps most relevant to health care decision makers. Through a qualitative assessment of case studies, we identify five key principles for the effective engagement of a broad coalition of participants in research intended to improve health care and control costs. Those principles are to ensure balance among the participating stakeholders; get participants to "buy in" to the process and understand their roles; provide neutral and expert facilitators for research discussions; establish connections among the participants; and keep the participants engaged throughout the research process.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          20921483
          10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0675

          Chemistry
          Comparative Effectiveness Research,organization & administration,Humans,Patient Participation,Physician's Role,Physicians,Research Design,United States

          Comments

          Comment on this article