9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Bodies of evidence: The human remains from Flinders Petrie’s excavations in British Mandate Palestine

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          In the 1920s and 1930s Flinders Petrie excavated several sites in British Mandate Palestine (Tell Jemmeh, Tell Fara and Tell el-ʿAjjul), encountering numerous burials dating from the Chalcolithic period down to the Ottoman period. The osteological finds were thought to have been discarded, until the authors identified a curated selection of skeletal human remains from these tombs at the Duckworth Laboratory in Cambridge in 2017/2018.

          Methods

          Rachael Sparks conducted archival research to explore how the human remains from Petrie’s excavations in the Southern Levant were recovered, recorded, curated and studied. This drew on original excavation records, contemporary publications, official and private correspondence, unpublished research notes, and the evidence of the human skeletal remains themselves.

          Following on this archival investigation, Nina Maaranen conducted skeletal analyses on individuals from Bronze Age contexts – recording crania and mandibles using various non-invasive, macroscopic techniques to estimate age, sex and ancestry.

          Results

          It was established that selected skulls were sent to Karl Pearson’s Biometric Laboratory at University College in London for craniometric study as part of wider programmes of research into ancient populations. After the war, changes in the organisation of the Eugenics Department at the University led to the transfer of Pearson’s collection of human skulls to the Duckworth Laboratory in Cambridge, where attempts to get the material published were unsuccessful.

          The current skeletal analysis of the assemblage revealed a preference for adult individuals, in line with the curation motivations of the original investigators. Earlier research on these remains was compared with our new data and contextualised within the theoretical and methodological development of bioanthropology and osteology.

          Conclusions

          Our investigation successfully identified the history of this assemblage, and revealed ethical issues surrounding the collection and subsequent use of some of these human remains, particularly where there may be familial links to modern Palestinian populations.

          Plain language summary

          This article is the result of investigations into the archaeological and skeletal evidence from the excavations of Flinders Petrie in Palestine in the 1920s and 1930s, exploring contemporary attitudes to human remains, their treatment during and after excavation, and subsequent research history. The human remains from this assemblage were first transferred to the biometric laboratory at University College, then on to the Duckworth Laboratory in Cambridge, but despite several attempts to have these individuals studied, they remained unpublished and were subsequently forgotten by the academic community. Our rediscovery of these remains has allowed us to produce the first lab analysis since their excavation, connecting them to their archaeological contexts, while raising several ethical questions about Petrie’s motivations and methods.

          Related collections

          Most cited references188

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences.

            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Brief communication: The London atlas of human tooth development and eruption.

            The aim of this study was to develop a comprehensive evidence-based atlas to estimate age using both tooth development and alveolar eruption for human individuals between 28 weeks in utero and 23 years. This was a cross-sectional, retrospective study of archived material with the sample aged 2 years and older having a uniform age and sex distribution. Developing teeth from 72 prenatal and 104 postnatal skeletal remains of known age-at-death were examined from collections held at the Royal College of Surgeons of England and the Natural History Museum, London, UK (M 91, F 72, unknown sex 13). Data were also collected from dental radiographs of living individuals (M 264, F 264). Median stage for tooth development and eruption for all age categories was used to construct the atlas. Tooth development was determined according to Moorrees et al. (J Dent Res 42 (1963a) 490-502; Am J Phys Anthropol 21 (1963b) 205-213) and eruption was assessed relative to the alveolar bone level. Intraexaminer reproducibility calculated using Kappa on 150 teeth was 0.90 for 15 skeletal remains of age <2 years, and 0.81 from 605 teeth (50 radiographs). Age categories were monthly in the last trimester, 2 weeks perinatally, 3-month intervals during the first year, and at every year thereafter. Results show that tooth formation is least variable in infancy and most variable after the age of 16 years for the development of the third molar. (c) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Inquiries into human faculty and its development.

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data CurationRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: ResourcesRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – Original Draft PreparationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data CurationRole: Formal AnalysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: ResourcesRole: Writing – Original Draft PreparationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Journal
                Open Res Eur
                Open Res Eur
                Open Research Europe
                F1000 Research Limited (London, UK )
                2732-5121
                23 January 2025
                2025
                : 5
                : 22
                Affiliations
                [1 ]University College London Institute of Archaeology, London, England, WC1H 0PY, UK
                [2 ]Bournemouth University Department of Archaeology & Anthropology, Poole, England, BH12 5BB, UK
                [1 ]Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
                [1 ]University of Hawaiʻi- West Oʻahu, Kapolei, USA
                [1 ]University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
                Author notes

                No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0859-9372
                Article
                10.12688/openreseurope.18758.1
                11871434
                40028628
                fe5253b6-b23c-43e0-adc0-2674d500b5a0
                Copyright: © 2025 Sparks RT and Maaranen N

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 31 December 2024
                Funding
                Funded by: Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
                Award ID: 668640
                Data collection of bioanthropological data for this project was conducted under the auspices of the Hyksos Enigma project (https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/668640/es), which received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Grant agreement No. 668640).
                The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Articles

                archaeology,biodistance analysis,craniometrics,ethics of human remains,karl pearson,flinders petrie,southern levant

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log