45
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evaluation of the White Test for the Intraoperative Detection of Bile Leakage

      other

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We assess whether the White test is better than the conventional bile leakage test for the intraoperative detection of bile leakage in hepatectomized patients. This study included 30 patients who received elective liver resection. Both the conventional bile leakage test (injecting an isotonic sodium chloride solution through the cystic duct) and the White test (injecting a fat emulsion solution through the cystic duct) were carried out in the same patients. The detection of bile leakage was compared between the conventional method and the White test. A bile leak was demonstrated in 8 patients (26.7%) by the conventional method and in 19 patients (63.3%) by the White test. In addition, the White test detected a significantly higher number of bile leakage sites compared with the conventional method (Wilcoxon signed-rank test; P < 0.001). The White test is better than the conventional test for the intraoperative detection of bile leakage. Based on our study, we recommend that surgeons investigating bile leakage sites during liver resections should use the White test instead of the conventional bile leakage test.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Bile Leakage After Hepatic Resection

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Minor versus major hepatic resection for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic patients: a 20-year experience.

            The choice between minor versus major resection or anatomic versus nonantatomic resection for small ( or = 3 segments) hepatectomy. In 373 patients, 259 underwent minor and 114 underwent major hepatectomy. Patients in the minor resection group had more severe underlying liver disease (P = .005). Therefore, only 29.3% received anatomic resection in the minor resection group in comparison with 72.8% in the major hepatectomy group (P = .0001). No difference was found in postoperative morbidity (P = .105), mortality (P =.222), intrahepatic recurrence (P = .742), and 5-year DFS and OS (31.6% vs 31.8%, P = .932 and 50.7% vs 44.0%, P = .114) in both groups. The type of operative resection was not found to be a significant factor affecting survival in univariate analysis, but the preoperative liver function (alanine aminotransferase [AST] or alanine aminotransferase [ALT], serum albumin, or Child-Pugh status), tumor characteristics (alpha-feto protein, size, and presence of daughter nodules), and blood transfusion were found to be independent factors that affect the DFS and OS in a multivariate analysis. The severity of cirrhosis and tumor characteristics depicts long-term survival rather than the type of resection in HCC. Crown Copyright 2010. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Bile leakage and liver resection: Where is the risk?

              The knowledge of risk factors for bile leakage after liver resection could reduce its incidence. Retrospective study. Tertiary care referral center. The study included 610 patients who underwent liver resection from January 1, 1989, through January 31, 2003. Liver resections without biliary anastomoses. Bile leakage incidence and its correlation to preoperative and intraoperative patient characteristics. Postoperative bile leakage occurred in 22 (3.6%) of 610 patients. Univariate analysis showed that cirrhosis (P = .05) or intraoperative use of fibrin glue (P = .01) was associated with a lower incidence of bile leakage. Moreover, the following factors were significant predictors of bile leakage: peripheral cholangiocarcinoma (P < .001), major hepatectomy (P = .03), left hepatectomy extended to segment 1 (P < .001), extension of transection out of the main portal scissure (P = .006), and hepatectomy including segment 1 (P = .001) or segment 4 (P = .003). At multivariate analysis, use of fibrin glue was an independent protective factor (relative risk = 0.38, P = .046), whereas peripheral cholangiocarcinoma (relative risk = 5.47, P = .02) and resection of segment 4 (relative risk = 3.10, P = .02) were independent risk factors for bile leakage. Hepatectomies including segment 4, especially if performed for peripheral cholangiocarcinoma, lead to a high risk for postoperative bile leakage. Intraoperative use of fibrin glue may reduce the risk of postoperative bile leakage.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                HPB Surg
                HPB Surg
                HPB
                HPB Surgery
                Hindawi Publishing Corporation
                0894-8569
                1607-8462
                2012
                3 April 2012
                : 2012
                : 425435
                Affiliations
                1Department of Surgery, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
                2College of Medicine, Rangsit University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
                Author notes

                Academic Editor: Vito R. Cicinnati

                Article
                10.1155/2012/425435
                3323837
                22547901
                fe78f382-8ea7-42cf-a3d2-35f27bab37d7
                Copyright © 2012 Kawin Leelawat et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 22 December 2011
                : 31 January 2012
                : 2 February 2012
                Categories
                Clinical Study

                Surgery
                Surgery

                Comments

                Comment on this article