140
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Global non-linear effect of temperature on economic production.

      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 4 , 5
      Nature
      Springer Nature

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Growing evidence demonstrates that climatic conditions can have a profound impact on the functioning of modern human societies, but effects on economic activity appear inconsistent. Fundamental productive elements of modern economies, such as workers and crops, exhibit highly non-linear responses to local temperature even in wealthy countries. In contrast, aggregate macroeconomic productivity of entire wealthy countries is reported not to respond to temperature, while poor countries respond only linearly. Resolving this conflict between micro and macro observations is critical to understanding the role of wealth in coupled human-natural systems and to anticipating the global impact of climate change. Here we unify these seemingly contradictory results by accounting for non-linearity at the macro scale. We show that overall economic productivity is non-linear in temperature for all countries, with productivity peaking at an annual average temperature of 13 °C and declining strongly at higher temperatures. The relationship is globally generalizable, unchanged since 1960, and apparent for agricultural and non-agricultural activity in both rich and poor countries. These results provide the first evidence that economic activity in all regions is coupled to the global climate and establish a new empirical foundation for modelling economic loss in response to climate change, with important implications. If future adaptation mimics past adaptation, unmitigated warming is expected to reshape the global economy by reducing average global incomes roughly 23% by 2100 and widening global income inequality, relative to scenarios without climate change. In contrast to prior estimates, expected global losses are approximately linear in global mean temperature, with median losses many times larger than leading models indicate.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Penn World Table (Mark 5): An Expanded Set of International Comparisons, 1950-1988

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              What Do We Learn from the Weather? The New Climate-Economy Literature†

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Nature
                Nature
                Springer Nature
                1476-4687
                0028-0836
                Nov 12 2015
                : 527
                : 7577
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Earth System Science, Stanford University, California 94305, USA.
                [2 ] Center on Food Security and the Environment, Stanford University, California 94305, USA.
                [3 ] Goldman School of Public Policy, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.
                [4 ] National Bureau of Economic Research.
                [5 ] Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley, California, 94720, USA.
                Article
                nature15725
                10.1038/nature15725
                26503051
                fe7bb079-56dd-49e9-8e93-2392cd6e9899
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article