Blog
About

  • Record: found
  • Abstract: found
  • Article: not found

Influence of joint area design on tibial component migration: comparison among a fixed symmetrical, asymmetrical, and moveable bearing.

The journal of knee surgery

Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, instrumentation, Equipment Design, Female, Humans, Knee Prosthesis, Male, Middle Aged, Polyethylene, Prosthesis Failure, Range of Motion, Articular, Tibia, surgery, radiography

Read this article at

ScienceOpenPubMed
Bookmark
      There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

      Abstract

      Fifty-four knees (50 patients) were allocated to three different tibial polyethylene inserts (standard/rotating platform/FS1000) in the Freeman-Samuelson (Finsbury Orthopaedics Ltd, Surrey, United Kingdom) total knee arthroplasty. The FS1000 design has a spherical medial and a roller-in-trough configuration laterally. Radiostereometric examinations were done postoperatively and after 3, 12, and 24 months. The median migration of the metal-backing and the Hospital for Special Surgery scores did not differ between the three groups. At 2 years, the median external/ internal displacements for the rotating platforms were 2.8 degrees and 0.2 degrees, respectively (rotating platforms versus standard inserts/rotating platforms versus FS1000: P < .0005). Longitudinal rotations above the detection limits for radiostereometry were observed in some of the fixed implants (standard and FS1000 designs), indicating conditions for backside wear.

      Related collections

      Author and article information

      Journal
      17288084

      Comments

      Comment on this article