99
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      COVID-19: A Boon or a Bane for Creativity?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In many countries, the COVID-19 pandemic led to a period of lockdown that impacted individuals’ lifestyles, in both professional and personal spheres. New problems and challenges arose, as well as opportunities. Numerous studies have examined the negative effects of lockdown measures, but few have attempted to shine light on the potential positive effects that may come out of these measures. We focused on one particular positive outcome that might have emerged from lockdown: creativity. To this end, this paper compared self-reported professional creativity (Pro-C) and everyday creativity (little-c) before and during lockdown, using a questionnaire-based study conducted on a French sample ( N = 1266). We expected participants to be more creative during than prior to lockdown, in both professional and everyday spheres. Regarding Pro-C, we did not see any significant differences between the two comparison points, before and during lockdown. Regarding everyday creativity, we observed a significant increase during lockdown. Furthermore, our results suggest that participants with a lower baseline creativity (before lockdown) benefited more from the situation than those with a higher initial baseline creativity. Our results provide new insights on the impact of lockdown and its positive outcomes. These measures may have inarguably negative consequences on the physical and mental health of many, but their positive impact exists as well.

          Related collections

          Most cited references72

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence

          Summary The December, 2019 coronavirus disease outbreak has seen many countries ask people who have potentially come into contact with the infection to isolate themselves at home or in a dedicated quarantine facility. Decisions on how to apply quarantine should be based on the best available evidence. We did a Review of the psychological impact of quarantine using three electronic databases. Of 3166 papers found, 24 are included in this Review. Most reviewed studies reported negative psychological effects including post-traumatic stress symptoms, confusion, and anger. Stressors included longer quarantine duration, infection fears, frustration, boredom, inadequate supplies, inadequate information, financial loss, and stigma. Some researchers have suggested long-lasting effects. In situations where quarantine is deemed necessary, officials should quarantine individuals for no longer than required, provide clear rationale for quarantine and information about protocols, and ensure sufficient supplies are provided. Appeals to altruism by reminding the public about the benefits of quarantine to wider society can be favourable.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Estimating the Dimension of a Model

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                18 January 2021
                2020
                18 January 2021
                : 11
                : 601150
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Université de Paris and Univ Gustave Eiffel, LaPEA , Boulogne-Billancourt, France
                [2] 2Aix-Marseille University, Center for Research on the Psychology of Cognition, Language and Emotion , Marseille, France
                [3] 3Institute of Creativity and Innovation of Aix-Marseille , Marseille, France
                [4] 4Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale, Aix-Marseille University , Marseille, France
                Author notes

                Edited by: Roni Reiter-Palmon, University of Nebraska Omaha, United States

                Reviewed by: James Howard Murphy, Anderson University, United States; Philip A. Fine, University of Buckingham, United Kingdom

                *Correspondence: Maxence Mercier, mercier.maxence96@ 123456gmail.com

                ORCID: Maxence Mercier, orcid.org/0000-0001-9045-2032; Florent Vinchon, orcid.org/0000-0003-3443-3683; Nicolas Pichot, orcid.org/0000-0001-9131-706X; Eric Bonetto, orcid.org/0000-0002-0824-1103; Nathalie Bonnardel, orcid.org/0000-0002-5876-990X; Fabien Girandola, orcid.org/0000-0002-1253-1728; Todd Lubart, orcid.org/0000-0002-8776-8797

                This article was submitted to Organizational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2020.601150
                7848087
                33536973
                fefb6eb1-b434-412d-aa29-f3fb392dce25
                Copyright © 2021 Mercier, Vinchon, Pichot, Bonetto, Bonnardel, Girandola and Lubart.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 31 August 2020
                : 15 December 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 73, Pages: 10, Words: 0
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                lockdown,covid-19,creativity,creativity development,positive outcome,little-c,pro-c

                Comments

                Comment on this article