INTRODUCTION
Anaesthetic depth is the degree to which the central nervous system (CNS) is depressed
by a general anaesthetic agent, depending on the potency of the anaesthetic agent
and the concentration in which it is administered. Arthur Ernest Guedel (1937) described
a detailed classification of anaesthetic state based on the use of a sole inhalational
anaesthetic agent diethyl ether. The signs of this classical Guedel's classification
depended on the eyelash reflex, respiration, eyeball movements, pupillary size, and
muscular movements among others.
Though the action of general anaesthesia (GA) drugs on the cortex and the thalamic
area of brain leading to loss of consciousness is well known, the exact mechanism
by which these drugs produce anaesthetic state is not really well understood. A successful
GA is defined as a reversible triad hypnosis, analgesia, and abolition of reflex activity.
In a balanced anaesthetic technique that uses multiple drugs, the classical stages
of anaesthesia are concealed.[1] An inadequate GA can lead on to intraoperative awareness
with or without recall, while overdosage results in delayed recovery and possible
postoperative complications.
When the anaesthetic state was produced by one drug with relatively low specificity
of action, the depth of anaesthesia was actually equated with the depth of CNS depression.[2]
Therefore, a single index reflecting CNS depression in general could be used as a
measure of anaesthesia.
Awareness during general anaesthesia
An unintended intraoperative awareness can occur during GA when a patient becomes
cognizant of some or all events during surgery, and may have recall of those events.
It may be due to several reasons, the patient is unable to communicate with others.
Awareness during anaesthesia may be explicit or implicit memory. Explicit recall involves
the memory of events and speech and may result in a significant psychological sequel.
Implicit memory occurs where no recollection of events exists, but patient's behavior
may be modified by information received during anaesthesia. The reported incidence
of intraoperative consciousness or explicit memory recall, varies from 0.2% to 2%.[3]
Anaesthesia awareness is under-recognized and under-treated in most health care organizations,
because it is clinically difficult to recognise intraoperative awareness.[4] The physiologic
responses to awareness may include hypertension, tachycardia, or movement of limbs,
the presence of sweating and lacrimation. But in modern-day anaesthesia practice,
they are often masked using drugs like muscle relaxants, beta-blockers, or calcium-channel
blockers, etc. Hence, the incidence of awareness during anaesthesia with or without
recall may be much higher. The common complaints include auditory recollections (48%),
inability to breathe (48%), and pain (28%) and unidentified number of post-traumatic
stress syndrome.[5]
The key anatomic structures of the CNS that contribute to the state of consciousness
are the brain stem, pons, thalamus, and cortex with their connecting neural pathways.[6]
It is generally believed that administration of at least 0.5 minimum alveolar concentration
of any volatile anaesthetic agent should prevent awareness during GA.[7] Failure to
adjust the adequate depth can be due to interindividual variations in drug requirements
and also varying degree of pain intensity during a specific surgical procedure. This
can result in either overdosage or underdosage with both volatile and intravenous
anaesthetic techniques.[8]
Mechanism of action of general anaesthesia and electroencephalogram
The drugs used for GA can be either intravenous (IV) agents like propofol or volatile
agents such as sevoflurane and they produce their actions by modulating the permeability
at synaptic transmission level of CNS. These drugs affect the lateral temporo-parieto-occipital
junction and the mesial cortical core and finally cause unconsciousness by disrupting
cortical integration and cortical information capacity.[9] Induction of GA also inhibits
the excitatory arousal pathways originating in the brain stem and pons which are involved
in maintaining cortical arousal and form the so called ascending reticular formation.
These GA drugs being apolar, cross the blood-brain barrier, and interact receptors
causing neuronal hyperpolarisation and increased inhibition or decreased excitation.[10]
They potentiate the activity of inhibitory gamma-amino butyric acid type A receptors
in the brain, resulting in decreased electroencephalogram (EEG) activity. The low
voltage, high frequency wakefulness pattern of EEG changes to the slow-wave EEG of
the deep sleep, and then an EEG burst-suppression pattern.[11] There isgeneral reduction
of EEG activity during anaesthesia, which is proportional to the dose of GA drugs
administered. Physiological conditions such as age, race, gender, hypothermia, acid-base
imbalances, hypoglycemia or cerebral ischemia have a significant effect on the raw
EEG. A few well-known sources of electrical interference like electrocautery, pacemakers,
or warm blankets can distort EEG tracings, though EEG activity is not actually affected.
However, the drugs like ketamine, xenon and nitrous oxide produce anaesthesia by interacting
with other brain receptors, mainly, but not exclusively, inhibiting excitatory N-methyl-D-aspartate
brain receptors.
The Guedel's stage 3 plane 3 of GA is also known as the surgical plane of anaesthesia.
An overdose of drugs can rapidly lead on to stage 4 anaesthesia resulting in cardio-respiratory
arrest.[12] Hence it is essential to monitor and administer adequate dose of GA to
reduce the incidence of intraoperative awareness. There are devices that can measure
End-tidal concentration of volatile anaesthetic or can predict plasma concentration
of IV anaesthetics devices, but they do not measure the pharmacological effects of
drugs on brain activity. Hence an EEG based devices may be a good compromise for monitoring
the depth of anaesthesia. It is unlikely that any single method will be found to measure
the depth of anaesthesia reliably for all patients and all anaesthetic agents.[13]
The Burst suppression (BS) activity of brain represents an EEG pattern often seen
during deeper planes of anaesthesia. This pattern is composed of episodes of electrical
suppression alternated with high-frequency, high amplitude electrical bursts. The
duration of suppression periods increases with anaesthetic depth.[14]
Auditory evoked potentials (AEP) are the responses of the auditory pathway to sound
stimuli. An AEP is calculated by repeatedly applying an auditory stimulus to the patient
and averaging EEG periods that immediately follow each stimulus, so that non-stimulus-related
portion of the EEG is eliminated, and the specific evoked potentials are preserved.
EEG based depth of anaesthesia monitors
An EEG or AEP based monitors would enable objective, reproducible and continuous measurement
of anaesthetic depth, even when the patient is fully paralysed or has lost all responses
to painful external stimuli. Recent advances in the introduction of EEG-based monitors
have made important contributions towards understanding of the fundamental changes
in brain activity brought about by anaesthetic agents. The development of these monitors,
which directly measures the state of consciousness, would also enable a safe and cost-effective
anaesthetic procedure.[15]
All monitors analyse the potential fluctuations of EEG signals measured from the patient's
forehead. After amplification and conversion of the analog EEG signal to the digital
domain, various signal processing algorithms are applied to the frequency, amplitude,
latency, and/or phase relationship data derived from the raw EEG or AEP, and a single
number is generated, which is often referred to as an ‘index,’ and typically scaled
between 0 and 100. Then the artifacts arising from eye movement, swallowing or heart
activities are removed by artifact algorithm software. The facial muscle electromyogram
(EMG) can also be used as the surrogate parameter. Sudden appearance of frontal (forehead)
EMG activity suggests somatic response to noxious stimulation during lighter planes
of anaesthesia and may give warning of impending arousal. For this reason, some monitors
separately provide information on the level of EMG activity. Because the processing,
classification, and averaging of EEG derived indices needs time, there is always an
inherent time delay in presentation of the results on depth of general anaesthesia
(DGA) monitors. The reported time delays range from 26-106 s for the transition between
EEG suppression, and the awake state for a bispectral index (BIS) monitor.[16]
Any newer DGA monitor should be able to save the amount of anaesthetics used, shorten
recovery time or the length of stay in the recovery room and should produce long-term
benefits like, reduced risks of awareness-related morbidity. There should be visible
cost-benefit effectiveness for the patient and to the society.
The current EEG based DGA monitors have a soft sensor consisting of an EEG or AEP
electrodes which are integrated with custom hardware and software to produce a dimensionless
number on the scale from 0-100. This number is then used by the anaesthesiologist
as a reference point for reasoning and to decide whether the level of GA is appropriate
and if not, to increase or decrease the amount of general anaesthetic.[17]
The commercially available monitors
The first commercial DGA monitor Bispectral-Index Monitor or BIS®, was introduced
in 1992 and later from 1999 onwards, others followed (e.g., Narcotrend, AEP-Monitor/2,
Patient State Analyser (PSA), cerebral state monitor (CSM), Entropy and many more).
In the last decade, the BIS monitor has established itself as standard equipment for
GA monitoring. However, after rigorous testing, several drawbacks are now identified
and hence the quest for an ideal DGA is still on.
BIS monitor
The BIS monitor was introduced by Aspect Medical Systems. The BIS index is a dimensionless
number from 0 (isoelectricity) to 100 (awake) measured from the patient's forehead.
A reading of 40-60 indicates an adequate depth of hypnosis.
Narcotrend monitor
The Narcotrend monitor (2001) records EEG from the forehead which is digitised and
then subjected to extensive artefact detection and removal algorithms. Meanwhile,
the monitor also calculates the surrogate EMG parameters. Narcotrend monitor has two
recording modes; the one channel mode has the standard for the assessment of the depth
of hypnosis during anaesthesia or sedation, and the two-channel mode for comparison
of signals from the two hemispheres of the brain. The Narcotrend would have lesser
problems with EMG interference than the BIS monitor.
Auditory evoked potential monitor
The first commercial monitor based on AEP was introduced by Danmeter in 2000. Later
spectral EEG parameters are included in the next version of AEP Monitor 2. Along with
the AEP-Autoregressive index (AAI), additional EEG parameters, the BS ratio and EMG
bars are also displayed alongside the AAI. All the above parameters must be monitored
simultaneously in order to ensure optimal sedation of the patient during GA. Unlike
other monitors, AAI can be displayed on two scales: Either from 0+to 100, or from
0 to 60; the second scale is recommended, and the optimal anaesthesia is achieved
if the index values are between 15 and 25.
PSA 4000 monitor
The Patient State Analyser 4000 (PSA) developed by the Physiometrix (2001) calculates
the value of the index from four EEG channels. Patient state index, is a dimensionless
number from 100 (awake) to 0 (isoelectricity). Additionally, surrogate analysis is
performed by calculating BS and arousal detection parameters.
The index of consciousness monitor
The Index of Consciousness (IoC) monitor also records the EEG with three surface electrodes
attached to the patient's forehead. In addition, the IoC monitor displays EMG bar,
signal quality bar and Burst Supression Ratio (BSR).
Cerebral state monitor
The cerebral state monitor (CSM) was introduced in 2004 and marketed as a low-cost
DGA monitor by Danmeter A/S, Odense, Denmark. It is a portable, wireless monitor that
uses the time and frequency domain analysis and shows the cerebral state index (CSI)
on a 0-100 scale; and 40-60 indicates an adequate depth of hypnosis.[18] The CSM is
built upon the EEG-algorithm of its predecessor AEP-Monitor/2 and uses the same electrodes.
CSI can be used for detecting the depth of anaesthesia or sedation, but overlapping
EEG with EMG is an important and sometimes very hazardous pitfall.
Entropy
The Entropy Module was introduced in 2003 by the Datex-Ohmeda Company. The main principle
involved is that increasing depth of anaesthesia causes increase in the regularity
of the EEG, which can be used to estimate the depth of anaesthesia. The signals are
divided into State entropy (SE) and Response entropy (RE) based on the two frequency
bands (SE-0.8-32 Hz and RE-0.8-47 Hz). Both are dimensionless numbers between 91-0
and 100-0, respectively. SE is based on EEG alone, but RE is based on both EEG and
electromyography. The RE can reveal more rapid alterations in frontal cortex activity.
State entropy values are resistant to sudden reactions of facial muscles, and hence
SE is used to assess hypnotic effects on the brain during GA.
Additionally, the monitor performs the BS analysis and displays the Burst Suppression
Ratio (BSR). The main difference from other DGA monitor is that this monitor outputs
two index values. While the SE includes information only from EEG, the RE includes
the EMG activity also and can be therefore used as a surrogate parameter. Consequently,
the difference between indices, which is larger than 10 indicates increased muscle
activity. Hence the interpretation of the results is left entirely to the anaesthetist.
Compared to BIS, entropy is considered to be a more accurate and reliable indicator
of the hypnotic effects of anaesthetic and sedative drugs.[19]
Limitations
BIS and entropy monitors were designed and studied to correlate EEG signals of adult
patients, with anaesthetists’ impressions of depth of sedation and anaesthesia across
a wide range of clinical states. Because of its presence in clinical practice for
over two decades, BIS monitor is used as a standard against which all other DGA Monitors
are compared, though it does not necessarily mean that the BIS monitor is superior
to others. The complexity of the algorithm is an important property because all the
monitors have developed on their own algorithms. No DGA algorithm has been published
with full technical specifications by any manufacturer, until now.
To date, no health authority has so far recommended that DGA monitors are compulsory
during GA, but it should be considered only on an individual basis.[20] In its review
of BIS monitor, the Food and Drug Administration observed that.[4] ‘Use of BIS monitoring
to help guide anaesthetic administration may be associated with the reduction of the
incidence of awareness with recall in adults during GA and sedation.’
Since adult EEG, data were used to authenticate the BIS algorithm, it cannot automatically
be extrapolated to young children, because the paediatric EEG pattern approaches the
adult pattern only by about 5 years of age. Comparison of BIS values between adults
and children suggest that following GA, BIS performs similarly both in adults and
children older than 1 year. Hence studies conducted to date demonstrate that the current
BIS provides useful clinical information in children, and shows promise for use in
paediatric anaesthesia practice in similar ways to its use in adults.[21]
The future development of DGA monitors depend on consensus on the validation protocol
on an international platform and the practice of using open-source algorithms in the
design of mathematical interpretation of EEG signals during GA. But unfortunately,
there is no agreement on the minimum level of performance for EEG or AEP based DGA
monitors, although many validation studies have been conducted.[22] Hence, it is still
difficult to compare their performance because there is no consensus on the validation
methodology.
The currently available DGA monitors cannot always differentiate a sleeping patient
from an unconsciousness and anaesthetized patient. They can only monitor the hypnotic
component of GA but not the patient's stress level in response to nociceptive stimulus
during GA.[23] Clinically the changes in heart rate and arterial pressure are used
as signs of increased nociception during GA but they are neither specific nor sensitive,
though the surgical stress index (SSI), the response index of nociception (RN) and
the noxious stimulation response index (NSRI) can be better predictors of noxious
stimulus.
CONCLUSIONS
The usage of DGA monitor in paediatric anaesthesia practice is yet to catch up. There
is an urgent need to overcome the limitation of DGA monitors to measure the depth
of anaesthesia produced by drugs like ketamine or nitrous oxide and others. A monitor
which can measure not only the hypnotic component of GA but also the patient's stress
level in response to nociceptive stimulus during GA are desirable.