53
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Phonological universals in early childhood: Evidence from sonority restrictions.

      1 , ,
      Language acquisition
      Informa UK Limited

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Across languages, onsets with large sonority distances are preferred to those with smaller distances (e.g., bw>bd>lb; Greenberg, 1978). Optimality theory (Prince & Smolensky, 2004) attributes such facts to grammatical restrictions that are universally active in all grammars. To test this hypothesis, here, we examine whether children extend putatively universal sonority restrictions to onsets unattested in their language. Participants (M=4;04 years) were presented with pairs of auditory words-either identical (e.g., lbif→lbif) or epenthetically related (e.g., lbif→lebif)-and asked to judge their identity. Results showed that, like adults, children's ability to detect epenthetic distortions was monotonically related to sonority distance (bw>bd>lb), and their performance was inexplicable by several statistical and phonetic factors. These findings suggest that sonority restrictions are active in early childhood and their scope is broad.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Lang Acquis
          Language acquisition
          Informa UK Limited
          1048-9223
          1048-9223
          2011
          : 18
          : 4
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Northeastern University.
          Article
          NIHMS350094
          10.1080/10489223.2011.580676
          3275087
          22328807
          ffa96d21-d0a2-4c34-9543-6d006f799c32
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article