35
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      What Story Does Geographic Separation of Insular Bats Tell? A Case Study on Sardinian Rhinolophids

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Competition may lead to changes in a species’ environmental niche in areas of sympatry and shifts in the niche of weaker competitors to occupy areas where stronger ones are rarer. Although mainland Mediterranean ( Rhinolophus euryale) and Mehely’s ( R. mehelyi) horseshoe bats mitigate competition by habitat partitioning, this may not be true on resource-limited systems such as islands. We hypothesize that Sardinian R. euryale (SAR) have a distinct ecological niche suited to persist in the south of Sardinia where R. mehelyi is rarer. Assuming that SAR originated from other Italian populations (PES) – mostly allopatric with R. mehelyi – once on Sardinia the former may have undergone niche displacement driven by R. mehelyi. Alternatively, its niche could have been inherited from a Maghrebian source population. We: a) generated Maxent Species Distribution Models (SDM) for Sardinian populations; b) calibrated a model with PES occurrences and projected it to Sardinia to see whether PES niche would increase R. euryale’s sympatry with R. mehelyi; and c) tested for niche similarity between R. mehelyi and PES, PES and SAR, and R. mehelyi and SAR. Finally we predicted R. euryale’s range in Northern Africa both in the present and during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) by calibrating SDMs respectively with SAR and PES occurrences and projecting them to the Maghreb. R. mehelyi and PES showed niche similarity potentially leading to competition. According to PES’ niche, R. euryale would show a larger sympatry with R. mehelyi on Sardinia than according to SAR niche. Such niches have null similarity. The current and LGM Maghrebian ranges of R. euryale were predicted to be wide according to SAR’s niche, negligible according to PES’ niche. SAR’s niche allows R. euryale to persist where R. mehelyi is rarer and competition probably mild. Possible explanations may be competition-driven niche displacement or Maghrebian origin.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Emerging patterns in the comparative analysis of phylogenetic community structure.

          The analysis of the phylogenetic structure of communities can help reveal contemporary ecological interactions, as well as link community ecology with biogeography and the study of character evolution. The number of studies employing this broad approach has increased to the point where comparison of their results can now be used to highlight successes and deficiencies in the approach, and to detect emerging patterns in community organization. We review studies of the phylogenetic structure of communities of different major taxa and trophic levels, across different spatial and phylogenetic scales, and using different metrics and null models. Twenty-three of 39 studies (59%) find evidence for phylogenetic clustering in contemporary communities, but terrestrial and/or plant systems are heavily over-represented among published studies. Experimental investigations, although uncommon at present, hold promise for unravelling mechanisms underlying the phylogenetic community structure patterns observed in community surveys. We discuss the relationship between metrics of phylogenetic clustering and tree balance and explore the various emerging biases in taxonomy and pitfalls of scale. Finally, we look beyond one-dimensional metrics of phylogenetic structure towards multivariate descriptors that better capture the variety of ecological behaviours likely to be exhibited in communities of species with hundreds of millions of years of independent evolution.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Molecular phylogeny of New World Myotis (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear DNA genes.

            Recent studies have shown that species in the genus Myotis have evolved a number of convergent morphological traits, many of which are more related to their mode of food procurement than to their phylogeny. Surprisingly, the biogeographic origins of these species are a much better predictor of phylogenetic relationships, than their morphology. In particular, a monophyletic clade that includes all New World species was apparent, but only a third of the 38 species have been analysed. In order to better understand the evolution of this clade, we present phylogenetic reconstructions of 17 Nearctic and 13 Neotropical species of Myotis compared to a number of Old World congeners. These reconstructions are based on mitochondrial cytochrome b (1140 bp), and nuclear Rag 2 genes (1148 bp). Monophyly of the New World clade is strongly supported in all analyses. Two Palaearctic sister species, one from the west (M. brandtii) and one from the east (M. gracilis), are embedded within the New World clade, suggesting that they either moved across the Bering Strait, or that they descended from the same ancestor that reached the New World. An emerging feature of these phylogenetic reconstructions is that limited faunal exchanges have occurred, including between the North and South American continents, further emphasizing the importance of biogeography in the radiation of Myotis. A fossil-calibrated, relaxed molecular-clock model was used to estimate the divergence time of New World lineages to 12.2+/-2.0 MYA. Early diversification of New World Myotis coincides with the sharp global cooling of the Middle Miocene. Radiation of the temperate-adapted Myotis may have been triggered by these climatic changes. The relative paucity of species currently found in South America might result from a combination of factors including the early presence of competitors better adapted to tropical habitats.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Ecological Segregation in Space, Time and Trophic Niche of Sympatric Planktivorous Petrels

              The principle of competitive exclusion postulates that ecologically-similar species are expected to partition their use of resources, leading to niche divergence. The most likely mechanisms allowing such coexistence are considered to be segregation in a horizontal, vertical or temporal dimension, or, where these overlap, a difference in trophic niche. Here, by combining information obtained from tracking devices (geolocator-immersion and time depth recorders), stable isotope analyses of blood, and conventional morphometry, we provide a detailed investigation of the ecological mechanisms that explain the coexistence of four species of abundant, zooplanktivorous seabirds in Southern Ocean ecosystems (blue petrel Halobaena caerulea, Antarctic prion Pachyptila desolata, common diving petrel Pelecanoides urinatrix and South Georgian diving petrel P. georgicus). The results revealed a combination of horizontal, vertical and temporal foraging segregation during the breeding season. The stable isotope and morphological analyses reinforced this conclusion, indicating that each species occupied a distinct trophic space, and that this appears to reflect adaptations in terms of flight performance. In conclusion, the present study indicated that although there was a degree of overlap in some measures of foraging behaviour, overall the four taxa operated in very different ecological space despite breeding in close proximity. We therefore provide important insight into the mechanisms allowing these very large populations of ecologically-similar predators to coexist.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2014
                23 October 2014
                : 9
                : 10
                : e110894
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Wildlife Research Unit, Dipartimento di Agraria, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Portici, Napoli, Italy
                [2 ]School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
                [3 ]EnvixLab, Dipartimento Bioscienze e Territorio, Università del Molise, Pesche, Italy
                [4 ]CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos da Universidade do Porto, University of Porto, Vairão, Portuga
                [5 ]Centro per lo studio e la protezione dei pipistrelli in Sardegna, Sassari, Italy
                [6 ]Forestry and Conservation, Cassino, Frosinone, Italy
                [7 ]Museo di Storia Naturale dell’Università di Firenze, Sezione di Zoologia ‘La Specola’, Firenze, Italy
                [8 ]Wildlife Consulting, Palo del Colle, Bari, Italy
                [9 ]Unità di Analisi e Gestione delle Risorse Ambientali, Guido Tosi Research Group, Dipartimento di Scienze Teoriche e Applicate, Università degli Studi dell’Insubria, Varese, Italy
                [10 ]Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche Veterinarie, Università degli Studi di Bologna, Ozzano dell’Emilia, Bologna, Italy
                [11 ]Studio Naturalistico Hyla snc, Tuoro sul Trasimeno, Perugia, Italy
                University of Regina, Canada
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: DR is a PLOS ONE Editorial Board member, and LC, PPDP, and CS run their own professional companies, named respectively “Forestry and Conservation”, “Wildlife Consulting”, and “Studio Naturalistico Hyla snc”. The authors declare that this does not alter the authors’ adherence to PLOS ONE Editorial policies and criteria.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: DR. Performed the experiments: LB MDF HR DR. Analyzed the data: LB MDF HR DR. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: DR MM LC PA PPDP AM DS CS. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: DR LB MDF HR.

                Article
                PONE-D-14-26463
                10.1371/journal.pone.0110894
                4207767
                25340737
                ffbda045-e443-4000-b3e8-75fedb574107
                Copyright @ 2014

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 19 June 2014
                : 17 September 2014
                Page count
                Pages: 12
                Funding
                DR and LB were funded by Italian Ministry of the Environment and the Protection of Land and Sea, CIG nr. 464598541B ( www.minambiente.it). HR was funded by the Programme Investigador FCT, IF/00497/2013 ( www.fct.pt). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Biogeography
                Ecology
                Spatial and Landscape Ecology
                Species Interactions
                Zoology
                Mammalogy
                Custom metadata
                The authors confirm that, for approved reasons, some access restrictions apply to the data underlying the findings. The dataset used for this study includes geographical locations for many important roosts of threatened bat species whose uncontrolled disclosure might affect species conservation. Data are therefore available from the National Database of the Italian Chiroptera Research Group for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data ( http://www.pipistrelli.net/drupal/contact).

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article