170
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Genetic and Epigenetic Fine-Mapping of Causal Autoimmune Disease Variants

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Genome-wide association studies have identified loci underlying human diseases, but the causal nucleotide changes and mechanisms remain largely unknown. Here we developed a fine-mapping algorithm to identify candidate causal variants for 21 autoimmune diseases from genotyping data. We integrated these predictions with transcription and cis-regulatory element annotations, derived by mapping RNA and chromatin in primary immune cells, including resting and stimulated CD4 + T-cell subsets, regulatory T-cells, CD8 + T-cells, B-cells, and monocytes. We find that ~90% of causal variants are noncoding, with ~60% mapping to immune-cell enhancers, many of which gain histone acetylation and transcribe enhancer-associated RNA upon immune stimulation. Causal variants tend to occur near binding sites for master regulators of immune differentiation and stimulus-dependent gene activation, but only 10-20% directly alter recognizable transcription factor binding motifs. Rather, most noncoding risk variants, including those that alter gene expression, affect non-canonical sequence determinants not well-explained by current gene regulatory models.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Systematic discovery of regulatory motifs in human promoters and 3' UTRs by comparison of several mammals.

          Comprehensive identification of all functional elements encoded in the human genome is a fundamental need in biomedical research. Here, we present a comparative analysis of the human, mouse, rat and dog genomes to create a systematic catalogue of common regulatory motifs in promoters and 3' untranslated regions (3' UTRs). The promoter analysis yields 174 candidate motifs, including most previously known transcription-factor binding sites and 105 new motifs. The 3'-UTR analysis yields 106 motifs likely to be involved in post-transcriptional regulation. Nearly one-half are associated with microRNAs (miRNAs), leading to the discovery of many new miRNA genes and their likely target genes. Our results suggest that previous estimates of the number of human miRNA genes were low, and that miRNAs regulate at least 20% of human genes. The overall results provide a systematic view of gene regulation in the human, which will be refined as additional mammalian genomes become available.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Xist lncRNA exploits three-dimensional genome architecture to spread across the X chromosome.

            Many large noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) regulate chromatin, but the mechanisms by which they localize to genomic targets remain unexplored. We investigated the localization mechanisms of the Xist lncRNA during X-chromosome inactivation (XCI), a paradigm of lncRNA-mediated chromatin regulation. During the maintenance of XCI, Xist binds broadly across the X chromosome. During initiation of XCI, Xist initially transfers to distal regions across the X chromosome that are not defined by specific sequences. Instead, Xist identifies these regions by exploiting the three-dimensional conformation of the X chromosome. Xist requires its silencing domain to spread across actively transcribed regions and thereby access the entire chromosome. These findings suggest a model in which Xist coats the X chromosome by searching in three dimensions, modifying chromosome structure, and spreading to newly accessible locations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Latent enhancers activated by stimulation in differentiated cells.

              According to current models, once the cell has reached terminal differentiation, the enhancer repertoire is completely established and maintained by cooperatively acting lineage-specific transcription factors (TFs). TFs activated by extracellular stimuli operate within this predetermined repertoire, landing close to where master regulators are constitutively bound. Here, we describe latent enhancers, defined as regions of the genome that in terminally differentiated cells are unbound by TFs and lack the histone marks characteristic of enhancers but acquire these features in response to stimulation. Macrophage stimulation caused sequential binding of stimulus-activated and lineage-determining TFs to these regions, enabling deposition of enhancer marks. Once unveiled, many of these enhancers did not return to a latent state when stimulation ceased; instead, they persisted and mediated a faster and stronger response upon restimulation. We suggest that stimulus-specific expansion of the cis-regulatory repertoire provides an epigenomic memory of the exposure to environmental agents. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                0410462
                6011
                Nature
                Nature
                Nature
                0028-0836
                1476-4687
                23 September 2014
                29 October 2014
                19 February 2015
                19 August 2015
                : 518
                : 7539
                : 337-343
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
                [2 ]Analytical and Translational Genetics Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
                [3 ]Diabetes Center and Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
                [4 ]Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD 20815, USA
                [5 ]Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
                [6 ]Center for Systems Biology and Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
                [8 ]Departments of Neurology and Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
                [9 ]California Institute of Technology, 1200 E California Blvd, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
                [10 ]Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
                [11 ]Program in Translational NeuroPsychiatric Genomics, Institute for the Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02142, USA
                [12 ]Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02142, USA
                [13 ]Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02142, USA
                Author notes
                []Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to: alexander.marson@ 123456ucsf.edu
                [*]

                Contributed equally.

                [7]

                Present Address: Translational Immunology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany

                Author Contributions: A.M., D.A.H. and B.E.B. designed the study. K.K.F. performed genetic analysis, PICS development and integration. M.J.D. supervised genetic analysis. J.Z, M.K., S.B., N.S, H.W., R.J.H.R., A.A.S., M.H., M.J.C.-A., D.M., C.J.H., V.K.K. and C.B.E. contributed to data collection and analysis. N.A.P. and P.L.D.J. contributed MS genotyping data. K.K.F., A.M., D.A.H. and B.E.B. wrote the manuscript.

                Article
                EMS60293
                10.1038/nature13835
                4336207
                25363779
                ffcd0a1e-1d20-480f-9c3f-9f14813e746a
                History
                Categories
                Article

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article