4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Psychological treatment approaches for improvement of maladaptive eating behaviors in bariatric surgery patients: a systematic review Translated title: Tratamientos psicológicos para el mejoramiento de las conductas alimentarias desadaptativas en pacientes de cirugía bariátrica: revisión sistemática

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract Introduction. Maladaptive eating behaviors (MEB) are highly prevalent among bariatric surgery patients and have been demonstrated to be important contributors for weight loss outcomes. A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of psychological treatment approaches on MEB in bariatric surgery patients. Materials and Methods. This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO. Literature review was performed in the databases PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. We included studies published between January 1st 1990 and October 18th 2019, with preor postoperative psychological treatment approaches in bariatric surgery patients aimed to improve MEB. Results. A total of 15 studies met the inclusion criteria (eight RCT and seven pretest-posttest studies), 752 participants were identified, 80.3% were female and the average participant's age was 46.1 years (SD ± 6.6). Follow-up period after intervention ranged from six weeks to 48 months. Five out of eight RCT reported a positive and significant effect (P <0.05) on MEB and four had medium to large effect size between the groups receiving psychotherapeutic interventions and the control group. Six out of seven pretest-posttest studies reported significant difference (P <0.05) on MEB and had small to large effect size after receiving psychotherapeutic interventions. Conclusion. Overall, the quality of the evidence ranged from low to moderate. Psychological treatments in bariatric surgery patients are inconsistent, though most results indicate improvement on MEB. Welldesigned long-term studies and other approaches strategies are warranted to assess the long-term effects on MEB and weight loss in bariatric surgery patients.

          Translated abstract

          Resumen Introducción. Las conductas alimentarias desadaptativas (CAD) son altamente prevalecientes en los pacientes de cirugía bariátrica y han sido demostradas ser contribuyentes importantes en los resultados de la pérdida de peso. Una revisión sistemática fue realizada para evaluar la efectividad de los enfoques de tratamientos psicológicos en CAD, en pacientes de cirugía bariátrica. Materiales y métodos. Esta revisión sistemática fue registrada en PROSPERO. La revisión de la literatura fue realizada en las bases de datos de PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library y Web of Science. Incluimos estudios publicados entre 1 de enero de 1990 y 18 de octubre de 2019, con enfoques de tratamiento psicológico pre o posoperatorio en pacientes de cirugía bariátrica destinados a mejorar las CAD. Resultados. Un total de 15 estudios reunieron los criterios de inclusión (ocho ensayos clínicos aleatorizados (ECA) y y siete estudios preprueba-postprueba),752 participantes fueron identificados, 80.3% fueron mujeres y la edad promedio de los participantes fue de 46.1 años (DE ± 6.6). El periodo de seguimiento después de la intervención varió de seis semanas a 48 meses. Cinco de ocho ECA informaron un efecto positivo significativo (P <0.05) en las CAD y cuatro tuvieron un efecto de medio a alto entre los grupos que recibieron intervenciones psicoterapeúticas y el grupo control. Seis de los siete estudios preprueba-postprueba reportaron diferencias significativas (P <0.05) en las CAD y tuvieron un tamaño de efecto de bajo a alto después de recibir intervenciones psicoterapéuticas. Conclusión. En suma, la calidad de la evidencia varió de baja a moderada. Los tratamientos psicológicos en pacientes de cirugía bariátrica son inconsistentes, aunque la mayoría de los resultados indican un mejoramiento en las CAD. Estudios bien diseñados y otras estrategias de enfoque son garantizados para para evaluar los efectos a largo plazo de las CAD y la pérdida de peso en pacientes de cirugía bariátrica.

          Related collections

          Most cited references55

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement

          Systematic reviews should build on a protocol that describes the rationale, hypothesis, and planned methods of the review; few reviews report whether a protocol exists. Detailed, well-described protocols can facilitate the understanding and appraisal of the review methods, as well as the detection of modifications to methods and selective reporting in completed reviews. We describe the development of a reporting guideline, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015). PRISMA-P consists of a 17-item checklist intended to facilitate the preparation and reporting of a robust protocol for the systematic review. Funders and those commissioning reviews might consider mandating the use of the checklist to facilitate the submission of relevant protocol information in funding applications. Similarly, peer reviewers and editors can use the guidance to gauge the completeness and transparency of a systematic review protocol submitted for publication in a journal or other medium.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

            Users of clinical practice guidelines and other recommendations need to know how much confidence they can place in the recommendations. Systematic and explicit methods of making judgments can reduce errors and improve communication. We have developed a system for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations that can be applied across a wide range of interventions and contexts. In this article we present a summary of our approach from the perspective of a guideline user. Judgments about the strength of a recommendation require consideration of the balance between benefits and harms, the quality of the evidence, translation of the evidence into specific circumstances, and the certainty of the baseline risk. It is also important to consider costs (resource utilisation) before making a recommendation. Inconsistencies among systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations reduce their potential to facilitate critical appraisal and improve communication of these judgments. Our system for guiding these complex judgments balances the need for simplicity with the need for full and transparent consideration of all important issues.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Prevalence of Obesity Among Adults and Youth: United States, 2015-2016.

              Obesity is associated with serious health risks. Monitoring obesity prevalence is relevant for public health programs that focus on reducing or preventing obesity. Between 2003–2004 and 2013–2014, there were no significant changes in childhood obesity prevalence, but adults showed an increasing trend. This report provides the most recent national estimates from 2015–2016 on obesity prevalence by sex, age, and race and Hispanic origin, and overall estimates from 1999–2000 through 2015–2016.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                jonnpr
                Journal of Negative and No Positive Results
                JONNPR
                Research and Science S.L. (Madrid, Madrid, Spain )
                2529-850X
                2021
                : 6
                : 3
                : 569-587
                Affiliations
                [1] Tijuana 22390 orgnameAutonomous University of Baja California orgdiv1School of Medicine and Psychology Mexico
                Article
                S2529-850X2021000300009 S2529-850X(21)00600300009
                10.19230/jonnpr.3865
                ffe06bee-41a3-4716-ad8e-2ccfa921613b

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 14 July 2020
                : 29 November 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 55, Pages: 19
                Product

                SciELO Spain

                Categories
                Review

                Maladaptive eating behaviors,Revisión sistemática,Cirugía bariátrica,Psicoterapia,Tratamiento psicológico,Conductas alimentarias desadaptativas,Psychological treatment,Psychotherapeutic,Bariatric surgery,Systematic review

                Comments

                Comment on this article