32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Physical function, gait, and dynamic balance of transfemoral amputees using two mechanical passive prosthetic knee devices.

      Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
      Aged, Amputees, rehabilitation, Cross-Over Studies, Gait, Humans, Joint Prosthesis, Knee Prosthesis, Male, Middle Aged, Postural Balance, Walking

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To investigate the effect of the 3R90 and 3R92 (Otto Bock Healthcare) mechanical passive prosthetic knee devices on the physical function, gait, and dynamic balance (sudden stop and turn) of transfemoral amputees. Intervention study with crossover design. University research center. Men (N=5; mean age ± SD, 58.8±11.9y) with unilateral transfemoral amputation. Prosthetic knee joints (N=2; 3R90 and 3R92). Acclimatization ranged from 14 to 47 days (25.5±9.3d). Physical function, gait, dynamic balance. The Timed Up and Go Test, 6-Minute Walk Test, and Four Square Step Test measures improved with the 3R92. Total scores on the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire were similar for the 3R92 (82.0±6.3) and the participant's own or original device (83.9±4.8). These devices were rated higher than the 3R90 (65.5±16.8). Compared with the original device, gait velocity was significantly slower (5cm/s; P=.017) with the 3R92, but was unchanged for the 3R90. This difference was not considered clinically significant because the effect size was small (0.2). No other significant gait differences were found. Large temporal gait asymmetries observed with the original device remained with the 3R90 and 3R92 (step, ≈20%; single support, ≈30%; stance, ≈19%). Although no significant differences were found for the sudden-turn or sudden-stop tasks, the sudden-turn group success rates were highest with the original devices. Gait and symmetry measures were unchanged. Gait speed was slower with the 3R92, but this was not considered to be clinically significant. Sudden-turn success rates generally were higher with the original devices. A crossover stepping movement was more difficult to implement than a side-stepping movement during sudden turns. Copyright © 2010 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          20875515
          10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.014

          Chemistry
          Aged,Amputees,rehabilitation,Cross-Over Studies,Gait,Humans,Joint Prosthesis,Knee Prosthesis,Male,Middle Aged,Postural Balance,Walking

          Comments

          Comment on this article