41
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The effects of needleless connectors on catheter-related bloodstream infections.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Needleless connectors, including the standard split septum and the luer-activated mechanical valve connectors, have been introduced into clinical practice to eliminate the risk of needlestick injuries by avoiding the use of needles when accessing the intravascular catheters. Negative and positive displacement mechanical valves have been associated with increased rates of catheter-related bloodstream infections as compared with split septum connectors. Based on available data, split septum connectors should be preferentially used instead of mechanical valves. Adequate disinfection by scrubbing the access port preferably with chlorhexidine is recommended to minimize the risk of catheter microbial contamination along with proper infection control practices. Large prospective randomized clinical trials are needed to evaluate further the possible causes and effects of different types of mechanical valve needleless connectors on bloodstream infections.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Am J Infect Control
          American journal of infection control
          Elsevier BV
          1527-3296
          0196-6553
          May 2011
          : 39
          : 4
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Clinical, Social, and Administrative Sciences, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0008, USA. imadb@umich.edu
          Article
          S0196-6553(10)00895-3
          10.1016/j.ajic.2010.07.011
          21256629
          ffec72a8-83bf-4e5e-bc4f-7dc6061e5acf
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article