Challenges in the diagnosis of microbial keratitis: A detailed review with update and general guidelines

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

The incidence of microbial keratitis (MK) is variable worldwide with an estimated 1.5–2 million cases of corneal ulcers in developing countries. The complications of MK can be severe and vision threatening. Therefore, proper diagnosis of the causative organism is essential for early successful treatment. Accurate sampling of microbiological specimens in MK is an important step in identifying the infective organism. Corneal scrapping, tear samples and corneal biopsy are examples of specimens obtained for the investigative procedures in MK. Ophthalmologists especially in an emergency room setting should be aware of the proper sampling techniques based on their microbiology-related basic information for each category of MK. This review article briefly describes the clinical presentation and defines in details the best updated diagnostic methods used in different types of MK. It can be used as a guide for ophthalmology trainees and general ophthalmologists who may be handling such cases at initial presentation.

Related collections

Most cited references 53

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Risk factors and causative organisms in microbial keratitis.

Matthew Green, Andrew Apel, Fiona Stapleton (2008)

To establish the risk factors, causative organisms, levels of antibiotic resistance, patient demographics, clinical presentations, and clinical outcomes of microbial keratitis at a tertiary hospital in Australia. Patients who had a corneal scraping for culture over a 5-year period were identified through the local microbiology database, and a retrospective audit of their medical records was carried out. Clinical information was gathered from medical records, and smear, culture, and antibiotic resistance results were from the microbiology database. An index of disease severity was calculated for each patient from scores for the magnitude of the epithelial defect and anterior-chamber reaction and the location of the lesion. Associations between risk factors for keratitis and variables such as patient demographics, causative organism and antibiotic resistance, disease severity, and outcome were analyzed by using analysis of variance and chi tests with appropriate correction for multiple comparisons. Two hundred fifty-three cases of microbial keratitis in 231 patients were included. Sixty percent of patients were men, and there was a bimodal distribution in the age of presentation. Common risk factors for keratitis were contact lens wear (53; 22%), ocular surface disease (45; 18%), ocular trauma (41; 16%), and prior ocular surgery (28; 11%). Gram stains were positive in 33%, with a sensitivity of 53% and specificity of 89%. Cultures of corneal scrapings were positive in 65% of cases, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (44; 17%), coagulase-negative staphylococci (22; 9%), Staphylococcus aureus (19; 8%), and fungi (7; 3%) were commonly recovered. P. aeruginosa was more common than other culture results in contact lens-related cases (55% vs. 0%-23%; P < 0.001), and S. aureus was more common than other culture results in ocular surgery-related cases (29% vs. 0%-21%; P < 0.001). Patients with keratitis related to prior ocular surface disease had more severe keratitis at the time of scraping (P = 0.037). Cultures positive for Fusarium, P. aeruginosa, and other Gram-negative organisms had statistically significantly more severe keratitis at the time of scraping, whereas patients with negative cultures had milder keratitis (P = 0.030). Only 2% of all bacterial isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin, 20% of Gram-positive isolates were resistant to cephalothin, and no Gram-negative isolates were resistant to gentamicin. In this series, the most common risk factor for keratitis was contact lens wear and the most commonly isolated organism was P. aeruginosa.

0 comments Cited 135 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: found

Is Open Access

Review of epidemiological features, microbiological diagnosis and treatment outcome of microbial keratitis: Experience of over a decade

Usha Gopinathan, Savitri Sharma, Prashant Garg … (2009)

Purpose: To review the epidemiological characteristics, microbiological profile, and treatment outcome of patients with suspected microbial keratitis. Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis of a non-comparative series from the database was done. All the patients presenting with corneal stromal infiltrate underwent standard microbiologic evaluation of their corneal scrapings, and smear and culture-guided antimicrobial therapy. Results: Out of 5897 suspected cases of microbial keratitis 3563 (60.4%) were culture-proven (bacterial – 1849, 51.9%; fungal – 1360, 38.2%; Acanthamoeba – 86, 2.4%; mixed – 268, 7.5%). Patients with agriculture-based activities were at 1.33 times (CI 1.16–1.51) greater risk of developing microbial keratitis and patients with ocular trauma were 5.33 times (CI 6.41–6.44) more likely to develop microbial keratitis. Potassium hydroxide with calcofluor white was most sensitive for detecting fungi (90.6%) and Acanthamoeba (84.0%) in corneal scrapings, however, Gram stain had a low sensitivity of 56.6% in detection of bacteria. Majority of the bacterial infections were caused by Staphylococcus epidermidis (42.3%) and Fusarium species (36.6%) was the leading cause of fungal infections. A significantly larger number of patients (691/1360, 50.8%) with fungal keratitis required surgical intervention compared to bacterial (799/1849, 43.2%) and Acanthamoeba (15/86, 17.4%) keratitis. Corneal healed scar was achieved in 75.5%, 64.8%, and 90.0% of patients with bacterial, fungal, and Acanthamoeba keratitis respectively. Conclusions: While diagnostic and treatment modalities are well in place the final outcome is suboptimal in fungal keratitis. With more effective treatment available for bacterial and Acanthamoeba keratitis, the treatment of fungal keratitis is truly a challenge.

0 comments Cited 117 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Microbial keratitis in South India: influence of risk factors, climate, and geographical variation.

M Bharathi, Smriti R. Ramakrishnan, R Meenakshi … (2015)

To determine the influence of risk factors, climate, and geographical variation on the microbial keratitis in South India. A retrospective analysis of all clinically diagnosed infective keratitis presenting between September 1999 and August 2002 was performed. A standardised form was filled out for each patient, documenting sociodemographic features and information pertaining to risk factors. Corneal scrapes were collected and subjected to culture and microscopy. A total of 3,183 consecutive patients with infective keratitis were evaluated, of which 1,043 (32.77%) were found to be of bacterial aetiology, 1,095 (34.4%) were fungal, 33 (1.04%) were Acanthamoeba, 76 (2.39%) were both fungal and bacterial, and the remaining 936 (29.41%) were found to be culture negative. The predominant bacterial and fungal pathogens isolated were Streptococcus pneumoniae (35.95%) and Fusarium spp. (41.92%), respectively. Most of the patients (66.84%) with fungal keratitis were between 21 and 50 years old, and 60.21% of the patients with bacterial keratitis were older than 50 (p < 0.0001) (95% CI: 5.19-7.19). A majority of patients (64.75%) with fungal keratitis were agricultural workers (p < 0.0001) [odds ratio (OR): 1.4; 95% CI: 1.19-1.61], whereas bacterial keratitis occurred more commonly (57.62%) in nonagricultural workers (p < 0.0001) (OR: 2.88; 95% CI: 2.47-3.36). Corneal injury was identified in 2,256 (70.88%) patients, and it accounted for 92.15% in fungal keratitis (p < 0.0001) (OR: 7.7; 95% CI: 6.12-9.85) and 100% in Acanthamoeba keratitis. Injuries due to vegetative matter (61.28%) were identified as a significant cause for fungal keratitis (p < 0.0001) (OR: 23.6; 95% CI: 19.07-29.3) and due to mud (84.85%) for Acanthamoeba keratitis (p < 0.0001) (OR: 26.01; 95% CI: 3.3-6.7). Coexisting ocular diseases predisposing to bacterial keratitis accounted for 68.17% (p < 0.0001) (OR: 33.99; 95% CI: 27.37-42.21). The incidence of fungal keratitis was higher between June and September, and bacterial keratitis was less during this period. The risk of agricultural predominance and vegetative corneal injury in fungal keratitis and associated ocular diseases in bacterial keratitis increase susceptibility to corneal infection. A hot, windy climate makes fungal keratitis more frequent in tropical zones, whereas bacterial keratitis is independent of seasonal variation and frequent in temperate zones. Microbial pathogens show geographical variation in their prevalence. Thus, the spectrum of microbial keratitis varies with geographical location influenced by the local climate and occupational risk factors.

0 comments Cited 101 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

All references

Author and article information

Contributors

Hind M. Alkatan

Journal

Journal ID (nlm-ta): Saudi J Ophthalmol

Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Saudi J Ophthalmol

Title: Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology

Publisher: Elsevier

ISSN (Print): 1319-4534

ISSN (Electronic): 2542-6680

Publication date PMC-release: 11 September 2019

Publication date (Print): Jul-Sep 2019

Publication date (Electronic): 11 September 2019

Volume: 33

Issue: 3

Pages: 268-276

Affiliations

[a ]Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, King Saud University-Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

[b ]Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, King Saud University-Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Author notes

[* ]Corresponding author at: Departments of Ophthalmology and Pathology, Postgraduate Medical Education Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, PO Box 18097, Riyadh 11415, Saudi Arabia. hkatan@ 123456ksu.edu.sa

Article

Publisher ID: S1319-4534(19)30050-5

DOI: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2019.09.002

PMC ID: 6819704

PubMed ID: 31686969

SO-VID: ffef5f59-e540-4235-aded-e714a679a261

License:

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

History

Date received : 28 July 2019

Date revision received : 31 August 2019

Date accepted : 2 September 2019

Comments

Comment on this article

Cited by 26

See all cited by

Most referenced authors 578

See all reference authors

- Version 1