- Record: found
- Abstract: found
- Article: found
Land reform in South Africa
Abstract
The newly‐elected South African government began in 1994 to make laws and implement a programme for land reform. It consisted of three dimensions: redistribution (transferring white‐owned commercial farm land to African users); restitution (settling claims for land lost under apartheid measures by restoration of holdings or compensation); and land tenure reform (to provide more secure access to land in the former bantustans). Only a few restitution claims have been so far resolved. After much rethinking a revised draft of a land tenure bill is to be presented to Parliament in late 2000, but as one stated aim is to give ‘land to tribes’, it remains to be seen whether it will bring increased democratisation, allowing for common resource management, or will entrench ‘decentralised despotism’.
This article concentrates on the most actively pursued dimension of land reform: redistribution. Under the diverse influences of rights‐based activism of earlier years and of World Bank advice about a ‘market‐led’ approach, the government has set up mechanisms to help finance and facilitate ‘community’ initiatives to acquire land, to settle on it and, if possible, to make productive use of it. What was advocated as a more rapid and less bureaucratic approach than a government agency acquiring and administering resettlement has instead spawned a sprawling edifice, some of it out‐sourced to an array of consultants, often with little experience and few credentials, and has led to a protracted process of transfer of a much smaller amount of land in five years than, say, Zimbabwe managed in the same period. The reasons for this are examined.
A policy rethink during 1999 has led to changes in emphasis which, hopefully, will speed up the redistribution of land, provide more back‐up to those resettled, and prioritise future grants for more productive agricultural use. This latter formula, however, is constricted by old‐fashioned ‘modernist’ (and often implicitly colonial) orthodoxies still current in South Africa, not least in the ANC and government. These are fixated on ‘commercialisation’ ‐ which usually translates into larger‐scale and high‐tech ‐ and the promotion of the interests of a would‐be black agrarian entrepreneurial class, rather than those of the propertyless. Some hope may derive from the inclusion of experiments in the new programme to chart an alternative to the ‘market‐led’ formula which would instead allow redistribution of land as an element within district‐level planning.
Content
Author and article information
References
Bernstein Henry. , ed. 1996. . The Agrarian Question in South Africa . , London : : F Cass. .
Bernstein Henry. . 1998. . ‘Social Change in the South African Countryside? . Land & Production, Poverty & Power & Journal of Peasant Studies . , Vol. 25: 4 July;: 1––32. .
Brown Marj. . 1997. . Land Restitution in South Africa: An Independent Evaluation, Institute for Development Policy & Management . , University of Manchester. .
Deininger Klaus. . 1999. . ‘Making Negotiated Land Reform Work: Initial Experience from Colombia, Brazil and South Africa’. . World Development . , Vol. 27((4)): 651––672. .
Department of Land Affairs (DLA). . 1998. . White Paper on South African Land Policy . Pretoria :
Kepe Thembela. . 1998. . “‘The Problem of Defining “Community”: Challenges for the Land Reform Programme in Rural South Africa’. ”. In Land Reform and Agrarian Change in Southern Africa . , School of Government, University of Western Cape. .
Levin Richard and Weiner Daniel. , eds. 1997. . “‘No More Tears ... Struggles for Land in Mpumalanga, South Africa’. ”. Trenton , NJ : : Africa World Press. .
Mclntosh Xaba Associates. . 30 November. 1999 . “‘Review of the Land Reform Support Programme’. ”. In Report to Department of Land Affairs . 30 November. , Pretoria :
Ministry of Agriculture & Land Affairs. . 1998. . “‘Agricultural Policy in South Africa: A Discussion Document’. ”. Pretoria :
National Land Committee (NLC). . 1999. . “‘A Report on the National Land & Agrarian Reform Conference’. ”. Pretoria :
Ntsebeza Lungisile. . ‘South Africa's Land Tenure Reform Programme in the former Bantustans: The example of the Eastern Cape Province’. In: . paper for NLC Conference; .
Van Zyl J, Kirsten J and Binswanger H P. , eds. 1996. . Agricultural Land Reform in South Africa: Policies, markets and mechanisms . , Cape Town : : Oxford University Press. .
Wildschut Adele and Hulbert S. . 1998. . “‘A Seed not Sown: Prospects for agrarian reform in South Africa’. ”. Deutsche Welthungerhilfe & Interfund. .