111
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      From January 2024, all of our readers will be able to access every part of ROAPE as well as its archive without a paywall. This will make ROAPE accessible to a much wider readership, especially in Africa. We need subscriptions and donations to make this revolutionary intiative work. 

      Subscribe and Donate now!

       

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Don't touch, just listen! popular performance from Uganda

      Published
      research-article
      ,
      Review of African Political Economy
      Review of African Political Economy
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            The power of ‘indigenous performance forms’ to mobilise popular energy and enthusiasm has led politicians, political activists and non‐government agencies in Africa and elsewhere to see them both as a threat and an opportunity. This article examines some of the ways in which ‘external’ actors have sought to harness ‐ and in the process either reinforce, redirect, or indeed at times to neutralise ‐ the power of popular expression.

            The first section examines the importance of indigenous performance in charting people's history and reflecting popular world views, and then identifies some of the ways in which governments, political activists and NGOs have appropriated it for their programmes. The second section presents examples from Uganda, which exemplify some of the issues around the use of popular forms of expression in the service of external agendas. In the discussion and conclusions we take issue with the concept of ‘indigenous performance’, and warn against assuming that ‘indigenous performances’ are automatically authentic in what they have to say. We also argue that the subversive elements of ‘indigenous performance’ are likely to be highly resilient to such manipulation. Just as external actors may abuse the form by imposing a foreign content, so local actors may play with an apparently innocuous form to transmit critical messages ‐ to a limited range of peers. In the light of these discussions, the pros and cons of politicians and NGOs using indigenous performance forms as a development communication strategy are assessed.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            Journal
            crea20
            CREA
            Review of African Political Economy
            Review of African Political Economy
            0305-6244
            1740-1720
            March 2002
            : 29
            : 91
            : 37-52
            Article
            8704583 Review of African Political Economy, Vol. 29, No. 91, March 2002, pp. 37-52
            10.1080/03056240208704583
            41e83567-9779-40f3-94ae-ac2a0af9b51c

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Page count
            Figures: 0, Tables: 0, References: 12, Pages: 16
            Categories
            Original Articles

            Sociology,Economic development,Political science,Labor & Demographic economics,Political economics,Africa

            References

            1. Breitinger E. . 1994. . “‘Designing a multi‐ethnic theatrical idiom: Rose Mbowa's ‘Mother Uganda and her Children’. ”. In Theatre and performance in Africa: intercultural perspectives Bayreuth . , (African Studies Series 31). Edited by: Breitinger. .

            2. 1999. . Uganda, the cultural landscape, Bayreuth African Studies 39 . , Kampala : : Bayreuth and Fountain. .

            3. Bjorkman I. . 1989. . Mother, sing for me: people's theatre in Kenya . , London : : Zed Books. .

            4. Boal A. . 1979. . Theatre of the oppressed . , London : : Pluto. .

            5. Dolan C. . September. 1999 . ‘Peace research and the reconciliation agenda: report of a conference held in Gulu, Northern Uganda’ . , September. , ACORD. .

            6. Frank M. . 1995. . AIDS education through theatre: case studies from Uganda. . Bayreuth African Studies . , : 35

            7. Kerr D. . 1992. . ‘Participatory popular theater: the highest stage of cultural under‐development?’. . Research in African Literatures . , Vol. 22/3:

            8. _____. . 1995. . African popular theatre from pre‐colonial times to the present day . , Oxford : : James Currey. .

            9. _____. . 1998. . Dance, media entertainment and popular performance in South‐East Africa. . Bayreuth African Studies . , Vol. 43:

            10. Kidd R and Byram M. . 1981. . ‘A fresh look at popular theatre in Botswana: demystifying psuedo‐Freirian non‐formal education’. . Rural Development Participation Review . , Vol. 3((1))

            11. Plastow J. . 1999. . “‘Alemseged Tesfai: a playwright in service to Eritrean liberation’. ”. In African theatre in development . , Edited by: Banham M, Gibbs J and Osofisan F. . Oxford : : James Currey. .

            12. Vail L and White L. . 1991. . Power and the praise poem: Southern African voices in history . , University Press of Virginia/James Currey. .

            Comments

            Comment on this article