96
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      From January 2024, all of our readers will be able to access every part of ROAPE as well as its archive without a paywall. This will make ROAPE accessible to a much wider readership, especially in Africa. We need subscriptions and donations to make this revolutionary intiative work. 

      Subscribe and Donate now!

       

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The legacy of a Pariah state: South Africa's Arms trade in the 1990s

      Published
      research-article
      a
      Review of African Political Economy
      Review of African Political Economy
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            South Africa's defence industry was built up in the context of the UN arms embargo and during the period from 1975 to 1989. It was developed and coordinated by the Armaments Corporation of South Africa (Armscor), renowned for an unaccountable, insidious covert culture which involved arms smuggling, corruption and most recently selling $30million worth of arms to the government of Rwanda. A commission of inquiry ‐ the Cameron Commission has been set up by the government to look at an apparent lack of control within the defence sector. Yet, since the end of apartheid, Armscor has attempted to recast itself as a socially responsible institution in its commitment to greater openness and transparency. The debate which supports the expansion of South Africa's arms trade contend that the industry is an important economic asset and that the contract which Armscor has secured from the government will treble arms sales over five years, creating 20,000 new jobs. But at what price? As the industry is faced with a declining domestic market it is likely to revert to markets it is familiar with, where high profits are guaranteed.

            As Susan Willett states, the controversy between the moral and economic arguments — utilising different norms and assumptions resulting in political impasse ‐ must become more rigorous and detailed in order to overcome a stalemate. This article seeks to avoid further polarisation by considering the arms trade in terms of orthodox economic analysis and the political debate ensuing in the context of a fragile and embryonic democracy.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            crea20
            CREA
            Review of African Political Economy
            Review of African Political Economy
            0305-6244
            1740-1720
            June 1995
            : 22
            : 64
            : 151-166
            Affiliations
            a Centre for Defence Studies, Kings College , University of London
            Article
            8704118 Review of African Political Economy, Vol. 22, No. 64, June 1995, pp. 151-166
            10.1080/03056249508704118
            c9e2ffcc-b329-4f35-989b-991adbfa8dad

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Page count
            Figures: 0, Tables: 0, References: 19, Pages: 16
            Categories
            Original Articles

            Sociology,Economic development,Political science,Labor & Demographic economics,Political economics,Africa

            Bibliographic note

            1. Ball N. . 1988. . Security and Economy in the Third World . , Princeton : : Princeton UP. .

            2. Baran P and Sweezy P. . 1966. . Monopoly Capital . , New York : : Monthly Review Press. .

            3. Benoit E. . 1978. . ‘Growth and Defence in Developing Countries’. . Economic Development and Cultural Change . ,

            4. Cock J. . ‘South Africa's Arms Industry: Strategic Assets or Moral Cesspool?’. In: . paper presented to the Military Research Group Conference on Arms Conversion and Trade; . Johannesburg .

            5. Cohen R and Wilson P. . 1988. . ‘Superpowers in Decline? Economic Performance and National Security’. . Comparative Strategy . , Vol. 7((2))

            6. Defence Industry Working Group. . 1994. . ‘South African Arms Exports’ .

            7. Deger S and Sen S. . 1987. . “‘Defence Industrialisation, Technology Transfer and Choice of Techniques in LDC's’. ”. In Structural Change. Economic Interdependence and World Development . , Edited by: Borner S and Tayler A. . p. 233––54. . London : : Macmillan. .

            8. Dosi G. . 1982. . ‘Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories’. . Research Policy . , Vol. 11((2))

            9. Joffe. . A Framework for Industrial Revival in South Africa. In: . paper presented to the IDASA Workshop on South Africa's International Economic Relations in the 1990s; . June. ; .

            10. Kaplinsky R. . ‘South African Industrial Performance and Structure in a Comparative Context’. In: . paper prepared for the first meeting of South African Industrial Strategy Project; . July 6–10– ; , Johannesburg .

            11. Kolodziej E. . 1987. . “‘Re‐evaluating Economic and Technological Variables to Explain Global Arms Production and Sales’. ”. In The Economics of Military Expenditures: Military Expenditures Economic Growth and Fluctuations . , Edited by: Schmidt C. . p. 304––35. . London : : Macmillan. .

            12. Modise J. . 1994. . ‘The Future as a Shared Responsibility’. . Military Technology . , Vol. 14: March;

            13. Mullins A F. . 1987. . Born Arming: Development and Military Power in New States . Stanford , UP :

            14. Navias M. . 1993. . ‘Towards a New South African Arms Trade Policy’. . South African Defence Review . , Vol. 13:

            15. Nolan J. . 1986. . Military Industry in Taiwan and South Korea . , London : : Macmillan. .

            16. SADIA. . June. 1994 . Information Document . June. ,

            17. Smith R. . 1992. . “‘How Will Limitations Affect the Overall Economies of Exporter Nations?’. ”. In International Control of the Arms Trade . , (Oxford Research Group Current Decisions Report, No 8).

            18. Smith R, Humm A and Fontanel J. . 1988. . ‘The Economics of Exporting Arms’. . Journal of Peace Research . , Vol. 22((3))

            19. Vayrynen R. . 1992. . Military Industrialisation and Economic Development:Theory and Historical Case Studies . , New York : : UNIDIR. .

            Comments

            Comment on this article