135
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      From January 2024, all of our readers will be able to access every part of ROAPE as well as its archive without a paywall. This will make ROAPE accessible to a much wider readership, especially in Africa. We need subscriptions and donations to make this revolutionary intiative work. 

      Subscribe and Donate now!

       

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Democracy in Mozambique: the significance of multi‐party elections

      Published
      research-article
      Review of African Political Economy
      Review of African Political Economy
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            This article examines democracy as a process rather than an event, or some kind of transition from one regime to another via a period of exceptional change. In doing so, it reveals a set of often contradictory forces which seriously question the democratic content of social change in Mozambique since 1992. The key points which this article raises are: a particular model of democratisation has been, paradoxically, imposed on the masses by national and international elites, in the context of an extremely antidemocratic economic environment, dictated by the World Bank and IMF; people's views of democracy are inseparable from their economic condition and that consequently, ordinary peasants see democracy as meaningless in the face of the same old privations, or as something for others, in the context of differentiation; people have partially articulated the liberal‐democratic model around a challenge towards arbitrary state authority during an unstable and fluid conjuncture in Mozambique's history; the elections threw into relief local social dynamics, based on particular experiences of the war, Frelimo, and traditional authority. With the formal policy debate receiving little attention, beyond the ubiquitous promises for more schools and hospitals, local histories became active sites of contestation, used to legitimise and delegitimise the two main parties, and to re‐invent so‐called traditional power. While it may be true that the elections marked a reconciliation between Dhlakama and Chissano, at the local level conflict between the parties remains at a level which provokes daily concern for many villagers, especially as the material conditions of communal village life have generally remained very harsh since the end of the war.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            crea20
            CREA
            Review of African Political Economy
            Review of African Political Economy
            0305-6244
            1740-1720
            March 1996
            : 23
            : 67
            : 19-35
            Article
            8704175 Review of African Political Economy, Vol. 23, No. 67, March 1996, pp. 19-35
            10.1080/03056249608704175
            9095e441-f7c3-433f-b867-1622e9d6f6fa

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Page count
            Figures: 0, Tables: 0, References: 18, Pages: 17
            Categories
            Original Articles

            Sociology,Economic development,Political science,Labor & Demographic economics,Political economics,Africa

            Bibliography

            1. Adam Y. . 1993. . ‘Mueda 1917–1990: Resistência, Colonialismo, Libertação e Desenvolvimento’. . Arquivo . , Vol. 14:: 9––103. .

            2. Anderson P. . 1991. . Imagined Communities . London :

            3. Anonymous. . 1979. . Algumas Consideraçãoes Sobre o Problema de Sector Familiar am Cabo Delgado . Pemba :

            4. Cahen M. . 1988. . La Crise du Nacionalisme. . Politique Africaine . , Vol. 29:: 2––13. .

            5. Casal Y. . 1991. . ‘Discurso Socialista e Camponeses Africanos: Legitimação Politica‐Ideológica da Socialização Rural Moçambique. . Revista International de Estudos Africanos . , Vol. 14/ 15:: 35––75. .

            6. CEA, Centra de Estudos Africanos. . 1983. . A Situação nas Antigas Zonas Libertadas de Cabo Delgado .

            7. Egero B. . 1990. . Mozambique: A Dream Undone . Uppsala :

            8. Hall M. . 1990. . “The MNR: A Study in the Destruction of an African Country’. . Africa . , Vol. 60((1)): 39––68. .

            9. Isaacman A. . 1987. . ‘Regulos, Diferenciação Social e Protesto Rural’. . ’Revista International de Estudos Africanos . , Vol. 6/7:: 37––83. .

            10. Isaacman A. . 1995. . Cotton is the Mother of Poverty . London :

            11. Levin G. . 1990. . Joint Assessment of the Possibilities for Support to Rural Traders in Niassa, Cabo Delgado, Nampula and Zambezia .

            12. Mbwiliza J F. . 1980. . Towards A Political Economy of Northern Mozambique: The Macua Hinterland 1600–1900 . , Univ of Columbia. .

            13. Medeiros E. . 1984. . As Etapas mais Marcantes Do Comercio de Escravos no Norte de Moçambique e o Aumento da “Escravatura Domestica” na Formação Social Macua‐Meto no Sul de cabl Delgado entre 1850–1910’ . Maputo :

            14. Mondlane E. . 1969. . The Struggle for Mozambique . London :

            15. Penvenne J. . 1995. . African Workers and Colonial Racism. Mozambican Strategies and Struggles in Lourengo Marques 1877–1962 . London :

            16. Riley S. . 1992. . ‘Democratic Pressure or Political Adjustment: Democratic Politics and Political Choice in Africa’. . Third World Quarterly . , Vol. 13((3)): 539––553. .

            17. Soares P. . 1993. . Da Prova de Trabalho ao Bilhete de Identidade. . Arquivo . , Vol. 14:: 155––175. .

            18. Wilson K. . 1994. . ‘The People's Peace in Mozambique’. . Southern African Report . , Vol. 9((4)): 22––24. .

            Comments

            Comment on this article