159
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      Prometheus is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Hegemony of Microsoft®: An Australian Story

      Published
      research-article
      Prometheus
      Pluto Journals
      Microsoft®, Hegemony, Australian Public Schooling, Narrative
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            Each Australian state and the Australian Capital Territory has signed a 'whole of education department' contract with the Microsoft® Corporation for the provision of operating systems and other software. This contracted use of Microsoft® products is one story where the purchase of specific commodities is directly connected to the provision of public schooling. It is argued that through these contracts Microsoft® exercises a hegemonic relationship with the schooling systems in Australia. The legal relationships that exist between Microsoft® Corporation and the respective Australian states and territories schooling systems seem to mutually maintain and reinforce the monopolistic, or at best, oligopolistic position of Microsoft® Corporation and its hegemony over Australian public schooling. Further, it is argued that Microsoft's® hegemonic position in part is maintained by both establishing a 'commonsense' about its products and by receiving legitimation and authority through the State for its products used in Australian schools.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            cpro20
            CPRO
            Prometheus
            Critical Studies in Innovation
            Pluto Journals
            0810-9028
            1470-1030
            June 2003
            : 21
            : 2
            : 213-230
            Article
            10032491 Prometheus, Vol. 21, No. 2, June 2003, pp. 213-230
            10.1080/08109020308130
            8ae61ecf-0497-432e-a705-12f1233e5734
            Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Page count
            Figures: 0, Tables: 0, References: 49, Pages: 18
            Categories
            Original Articles

            Computer science,Arts,Social & Behavioral Sciences,Law,History,Economics
            Microsoft®,Hegemony,Narrative,Australian Public Schooling

            References

            1. Giroux H.. 1981. . Ideology, Culture & the Process of Schooling . , p. 94 London : : Palmer Press. .

            2. NASDAQ. . 2002. . Microsoft Corporation Holdings Summary . , NASDAQ. .

            3. Microsoft Corporation, Microsoft Authorised Academic Training Program (AAPT) Fact Sheet. . 1998. . Microsoft Education and Certification . , Australia: : Microsoft Corporation. .

            4. Microsoft Corporation. . 1998. . The Real Test is the Real World . , Australia: : Microsoft Corporation. .

            5. Jackson T. F.. . 2000. . Conclusion of Law, Civil Action No. 98-1232 (TPJ) . , p. 1United States of America. .

            6. Antitrust Case Filings. . 2002. . United Stales versus Microsoft United States of America . p. 1––5. .

            7. Wilcox J.. 2002. . “'Microsoft settlement watchers chosen'. ”. In CNET Networks . Edited by: CNET. .

            8. Slattery. . 27 January. 2003 . Internet Watch: Weekly Online Newsletter . 27 January. , p. 4 Slattery :

            9. Scruton R.. 1982. . A Dictionary of Political Thought . , p. 333 London : : Pan Books in association with The Macmillan Press. .

            10. Barr T.. 2000. . newmedia.com.au. The Changing Face of Australia's Media and Communications . , p. 6Australia: : Alien and Unwin. .

            11. Ministerial Council on Employment. . 1999. . Education, Training and Youth Affairs (MCEETYA), National Report of Schooling in Australia: 1996 . , Melbourne : : MCEETYA, Curriculum Corporation. .

            12. Partridge P.. 1973. . Society, Schools and Progress in Australia . , Australia: : Pergamon Press Australia. .

            13. Department of Education, Training and Employment (South Australia). . 2000. . Frequently Ashed Questions . , Department of Education, Training and Employment (South Australia). .

            14. Moyle K.. 2002. . Digital Technologies in Australian Public Schools: A Narrative Study of Government Policies .

            15. Australian Capital Territory Department of Education and Community Services. . 1998. . Grants to Schools Bringing TT Together, Software . , Information Technology Support. .

            16. Wells D.. 1999. . Schools and Teachers Save in Deal with Microsoft. . Ministerial media statement . , 17 August;

            17. Department of Education, Corporate Services, School Support Services. . 2001. . Microsofl Agreement . , Tasmania : : Department of Education. .

            18. Carr D.. 1986. . Time . , Bloomington : : Narrative and History Indiana University Press. .

            19. Polkinghorne D.. 1988. . Narrative Knowing and the Human Sciences . , USA: : State University of New York. .

            20. Ricoeur P.. 1991. . From Text to Action. Essays in Hermeneutics II . , London : : The Athlone Press. .

            21. Roe E.. 1994. . Narrative Policy Analysis: Theory and Practice . , Durham & London : : Duke University Press. .

            22. Gramsci A.. 1971. . Selections from the Prison Notebook . , London : : Lawrence and Wishart. .

            23. Williams R.. 1976. . Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society . , London : : Fontana. .

            24. Williams R.. 1989. . “'Hegemony and selective tradition'. ”. In Language, Authority and Criticism. Readings on the School Textbook . , Edited by: de Castell S., Luke A. and Luke C.. London, New York, Philadelphia : : The Palmer Press. .

            25. Department of Employment, Education and Training. . 2002a. . LATIS: Learning and Technology in Schools, FAQ's . , p. 1Department of Employment, Education and Training. .

            26. Parliament of Queensland. . 1999. . Estimates F-Education . , 13 October;: 483

            27. Parliament of Tasmania. . 10 June. 1999 . House of Assembly Estimates Committee A . 10 June. , p. 45

            28. 2000. . Parliament of the Australian Capital Territory. . Hansard 2000 Week . , Vol. 12: 7 December;: 3835

            29. Parliament of New South Wales. . 7 June. 2000 . Hansard Extract, legislative Assembly: Computers in Schools Program . 7 June. , p. 6765

            30. Department of Education Western Australia. . 1999. . Microsoft Software Enterprise Agreement . , Information for Schools. .

            31. Young B.. 2001. . “'Forward'. ”. In The Cathedral and the Bazaar. Musings on Linux and Open Source Code by an Accidental Revolutionary, . , 2nd edition. , Edited by: Raymond E.. p. ix––x. . USA: : O'Reilly. .

            32. Himanen P.. 2001. . The Hacker Ethic and the Spirit of the Information Age . , Great Britain: : Seeker & Warburg. .

            33. Capron H.. 1990. . Computers. Tools for an Information Age, . , 2nd edition. , p. 269USA: : Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company Incorporated. .

            34. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). . 2002. . Schools Australia (4221.0) . , p. 2Australia: : Australian Bureau of Statistics. .

            35. Mance R.. August. 1999 . Microsofl Software Enterprise Agreement . , August. , p. 1Education Department of Western Australia. .

            36. Spring G.. November. 1999 . Microsoft Software Enterprise Agreement . , November. , Department of Education, Training and Employment. .

            37. Moyle K.. 2002. . Digital Technologies in Australian Public Schools: A Narrative Study of Government Policies .

            38. Henderson L.. 1999. . 'Microsoft deal gives schools a licence to surf. . The Australian . , 11 May;: 44

            39. Little W., Onions C. and Friedrichsen G.. 1973. . The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary . , p. 494 Oxford : : Oxford at the Clarendon Press. .

            40. Apple M.. 1982. . Education and Power . , p. 18 London & Boston : : Routledge & Kegan Paul. .

            41. Education Department of Western Australia. . 1999. . Microsoft Software Enterprise Agreement . , p. 1Q&A, Education Department of Western Australia. .

            42. Carnell K.. 2000. . $300,000 Investment by Microsoft for Enhancing Information Technology Skills in ACT Education Sector . , p. 1Ministerial media release, Australian Capital Territory government. .

            43. Johnson R.. 2000. . Home-based Computer Program to Bridge Technology Divide . , p. 1Ministerial media release, Government of Western Australia. .

            44. Department of Education, Training and Employment (South Australia). . 1999. . Software Strategy. Microsoft Enterprise Agreement for the Department of Education, Training and Employment . , p. 1Department of Education, Training and Employment (South Australia). .

            45. Bourdieu P.. 1977. . Outline of Theory and Practice . , p. 188––9. . Cambridge : : Cambridge University Press. .

            Comments

            Comment on this article