+1 Recommend
1 collections

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      Prometheus is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Space, innovation and the locus of knowledge: an ontological response to Rutten

      Pluto Journals


            Marc Bahlmann is assistant professor at VU University Amsterdam. He received his Ph.D. from the Faculty of Social Sciences (VU University) for a study on knowledge dynamics among IT entrepreneurs located in the Amsterdam IT and new media cluster. His current research interests include alliance portfolios, organizational and regional innovation.


            Author and article information

            Pluto Journals
            1 March 2014
            : 32
            : 1 ( doiID: 10.1080/prometheus.32.issue-1 )
            : 105-110
            Department of Strategy and Organization, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands
            © 2014 Pluto Journals

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            Custom metadata

            Computer science,Arts,Social & Behavioral Sciences,Law,History,Economics


            1. Amin, A. and Cohendet, P. (2004) Architectures of Knowledge. Firms, Capabilities, and Communities, Oxford University Press, New York.

            2. Amin, A. and Roberts, J. (2008) ‘Knowing in action: beyond communities of practice’, Research Policy, 37, 2, pp.353–69.

            3. Bathelt, H. and Glückler, J. (2003) ‘Toward a relational economic geography’, Journal of Economic Geography, 3, pp.117–44.

            4. Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A. and Maskell, P. (2004) ‘Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation’, Progress in Human Geography, 28, 1, pp.31–56.

            5. Beugelsdijk, S. (2007) ‘The regional environment and a firm's innovative performance: a plea for a multilevel interactionist approach’, Economic Geography, 83, 2, pp.181–99.

            6. Brown, J. and Duguid, P. (2001) ‘Knowledge and organization: a social-practice perspective’, Organization Science, 12, pp.198–213.

            7. Dansereau, F., Yammarino, F. and Kohles, J. (1999) ‘Multiple levels of analysis from a longitudinal perspective: some implications for theory building’, Academy of Management Review, 24, pp.347–57.

            8. Durkheim, E. (1962) The Rules of the Sociological Method, Free Press, Glencoe IL.

            9. Felin, T. and Hesterly, W. (2007) ‘The knowledge-based view, nested heterogeneity, and new value creation: philosophical considerations on the locus of knowledge’, Academy of Management Review, 32, 1, pp.195–218.

            10. Grant, R. (1996) ‘Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm’, Strategic Management Journal, 17, pp.109–22.

            11. Keeble, D. and Wilkinson, F. (1999) ‘Collective learning and knowledge development in the evolution of high technology SMEs in Europe’, Regional Studies, 33, 4, pp.295–303.

            12. Klein, K., Dansereau, F. and Hall, R. (1994) ‘Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis’, Academy of Management Review, 19, pp.195–229.

            13. Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1992) ‘Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology’, Organization Science, 3, pp.383–97.

            14. Lam, A. (2000) ‘Tacit knowledge, organizational learning and societal institutions: an integrated framework’, Organization Studies, 21, 3, pp.487–513.

            15. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

            16. Maskell, P. (2001) ‘Towards a knowledge-based theory of the geographical cluster’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 4, pp.921–43.

            17. Maskell, P., Bathelt, H. and Malmberg, A. (2006) ‘Building global knowledge pipelines: the role of temporary clusters’, European Planning Studies, 14, 8, pp.997–1013.

            18. Morgan, K. (1997) ‘The learning region: institutions, innovation and regional renewal’, Regional Studies, 31, pp.491–503.

            19. Morgan, K. (2001) ‘The exaggerated death of geography: localised learning, innovation and uneven development’, paper presented to Future of Innovation Studies Conference, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Studies.

            20. Nahapiet, J. and Ghoshal, S. (1998) ‘Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage’, Academy of Management Review, 23, pp.242–66.

            21. Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.

            22. Oinas, P. (1999) ‘Activity-specificity in organizational learning: implications for analysing the role of proximity’, GeoJournal, 49, pp.363–72.

            23. Owen-Smith, J. and Powell, W. (2004) ‘Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: the effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community’, Organization Science, 15, 1, pp.5–21.

            24. Pitelis, C. (2012) ‘Clusters, entrepreneurial ecosystem co-creation, and appropriability: a conceptual framework’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 21, 6, pp.1359–88.

            25. Powell, W., Kogut, K. and SmithDoerr, L. (1996) ‘Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 1, pp.116–45.

            26. Rutten, R. (2014) ‘Learning in socio-spatial context: an individual perspective’, Prometheus, 32, 1, pp.67–74.

            27. Rychen, F. and Zimmermann, J.-B. (2008) ‘Clusters in the global knowledge-based economy: knowledge gatekeepers and temporary proximity’, Regional Studies, 42, 6, pp.767–76.

            28. Saxenian, A. (1990) ‘Regional networks and the resurgence of Silicon Valley’, California Management Review, 33, 1, pp.89–112.

            29. Saxenian, A. (2006) The New Argonauts: Regional Advantage in a Global Economy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.

            30. Simon, H. (1991) ‘Bounded rationality and organizational learning’, Organization Science, 2, pp.125–34.

            31. Sole, D. and Edmondson, A. (2002) ‘Situated knowledge and learning in dispersed teams’, British Journal of Management, 13, pp.S17–34.

            32. Spender, J. (1996) ‘Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm’, Strategic Management Journal, 17, pp.45–62.

            33. Thompson, M. (2011) ‘Ontological shift or ontological drift? Reality claims, epistemological frameworks, and theory generation in organization studies’, Academy of Management Review, 36, 4, pp.754–73.

            34. Visser, E.-J. and Boschma, R. (2004) ‘Learning in districts: novelty and lock-in in a regional context’, European Planning Studies, 12, 6, pp.793–808.

            35. Weick, K. and Roberts, K. (1993) ‘Collective mind in organizations: heedful interrelating on flight decks’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, pp.357–81.


            Comment on this article