104
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      Prometheus is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Interaction between tacit and codified knowledge in socio-spatial context

      research-article
      Prometheus
      Pluto Journals
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            Patrick Cohendet was previously dean of the Faculty of Economics at Strasbourg University (1982–1985), vice president of the University of Strasbourg (1991–1992), member of the Conseil des Applications de l'Académie des Sciences in Paris (1994–2002), and chairman of the International Business Department at HEC Montréal (2007–2008). He was also visiting professor at the University of Virginia, and the University of Tokyo. His research interests include the theory of the firm, economics of innovation, economics of knowledge, economics of creativity and knowledge management.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            Journal
            10.2307/j50022063
            prometheus
            Prometheus
            Pluto Journals
            0810-9028
            1470-1030
            1 March 2014
            : 32
            : 1 ( doiID: 10.1080/prometheus.32.issue-1 )
            : 101-104
            Affiliations
            Mosaic/HEC Montréal, Canada
            Article
            08109028.2014.945288
            10.1080/08109028.2014.945288
            2dd92a4c-98fe-457c-9db4-07422b17fc3e
            © 2014 Pluto Journals

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            Custom metadata
            eng

            Computer science,Arts,Social & Behavioral Sciences,Law,History,Economics

            References

            1. Amin, A. and Roberts, J. (2008) Community, Economic Creativity, and Organization, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

            2. Argyris, C. and Schön, D. (1978) Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Addison-Wesley, Reading MA.

            3. Breschi, S. and Lissoni, F. (2001) ‘Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: a critical survey’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 4, pp.975–1005.

            4. Brown, J. and Duguid, P. (1991) ‘Organizational learning and communities of practice: towards a unified view of working, learning and innovation’, Organization Science, 2, 1, pp.40–57.

            5. Cowan, R., David, P. and Foray, D. (2000) ‘The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 9, 2, pp.211–53.

            6. Gertler, M. (2001) ‘Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context or the undefinable tacitness of being (there)‘, paper presented at the Nelson and Winter DRUID Summer Conference, Aalborg, Denmark, June.

            7. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

            8. Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Belknap Press, Cambridge MA.

            9. Rutten, R. (2014) ‘Learning in socio-spatial context: an individual perspective’, Prometheus, 32, 1, pp.67–74.

            10. Simon, H. (1991) ‘Bounded rationality and organizational learning’, Organization Science, 2, 1, pp.125–34.

            Comments

            Comment on this article