+1 Recommend
1 collections

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      Prometheus is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Tacit knowledge, embedded agency and learning: local nodes and global networks

      Pluto Journals


            Alice Lam is Professor of Organisation Studies at the School of Management, Royal Holloway University of London. Her research focuses on the relationship between organizational forms, knowledge creation and societal institutions. Her current work examines the changing nature of academic scientific work and knowledge transfer between university and industry.


            Author and article information

            Pluto Journals
            1 March 2014
            : 32
            : 1 ( doiID: 10.1080/prometheus.32.issue-1 )
            : 93-99
            School of Management, Royal Holloway University of London, London, UK
            © 2014 Pluto Journals

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            Custom metadata

            Computer science,Arts,Social & Behavioral Sciences,Law,History,Economics


            1. Ashiem, B., Cohen, L. and Vang, J. (2007) ‘Face-to-face, buzz and knowledge bases: socio-spatial implications for learning, innovation and innovation policy’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 25, pp.655–70.

            2. Brown, J. and Duguid, P. (1991) ‘Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation’, Organization Science, 2, 1, pp.40–57.

            3. Duguid, P. (2005) ‘The art of knowing: social and tacit dimensions of knowledge and the limits of the community of practice’, The Information Society, 21, pp.109–18.

            4. Durkheim, E. (1964) The Rules of Sociological Method, Free Press, New York.

            5. Faulcombridge, J. (2006) ‘Stretching tacit knowledge beyond a local fix? Global spaces of learning in advertising professional service firms’, Journal of Economic Geography, 6, pp.517–40.

            6. Felin, T. and Hesterley, W. (2007) ‘The knowledge-based view, nested heterogeneity, and new value creation: philosophical considerations on the locus of knowledge’, Academy of Management Review, 32, 1, pp.195–218.

            7. Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, University of California Press, Berkeley CA.

            8. Granovetter, M. (1985) ‘Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology, 91, 3, pp.481–510.

            9. Gupta, A., Tesluk, P. and Taylor, M. (2007) ‘Innovation at and across multiple levels of analysis’, Organization Science, 18, 6, pp.885–97.

            10. Hansen, M. (1999) ‘The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunit’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 1, pp.82–111.

            11. Hargadon, A. (2002) ‘Brokering knowledge: linking learning and innovation’, Research in Organizational Behavior, 24, pp.41–85.

            12. Klaerding, C. (2009) ‘Understanding remigration and innovation: an appeal for a cultural economic geography’, Geography Compass, 3, 5, pp.1732–43.

            13. Lam, A. (2000) ‘Tacit knowledge, organizational learning and societal institutions: an integrated framework’, Organization Studies, 21, 3, pp.487–513.

            14. Lam, A. (2002) ‘Alternative societal models of learning and innovation in the knowledge economy’, International Social Science Journal, 171, pp.67–82.

            15. Minbaeva, D. and Michailova, S. (2004) ‘Knowledge transfer and expatriation in multinational corporations’, Employee Relations, 26, 6, pp.663–79.

            16. Mintzberg, H. (1979) The Structuring of Organization, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ.

            17. Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995) The Knowledge Creating Company, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

            18. Orlikowski, W. (2002) ‘Knowing in practice: enacting a collective capability in distributed organization’, Organization Science, 13, 3, pp.249–73.

            19. Osterloh, M. (2005) ‘Human resources management and knowledge creation’ in Nonaka, I. and Kazuo, I. (eds) Handbook of Knowledge Creation, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp.158–75.

            20. Polanyi, M. (1966) The Tacit Dimension, Doubleday, New York.

            21. Reber, A.S. (1993) Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge: An Essay on Cognitive Unconscious, Oxford University Press, New York.

            22. Reagans, R. and McEvily, B. (2003) ‘Network structure and knowledge transfer: the effect of cohesion and range’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 2, pp.240–67.

            23. Rutten, R. (2014) ‘Learning in socio-spatial context: an individual perspective’, Prometheus, 32, 1, pp.67–74.

            24. Uzzi, B. (1997) ‘Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 1, pp.35–67.

            25. Saxenian, A. and Hsu, J.-Y. (2001) ‘The Silicon Valley-Hsinchu connection: technical communities and industrial upgrading’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 4, pp.893–920.

            26. Saxenian, A. (2005) ‘From brain drain to brain-circulation: transnational communities and regional upgrading in China and India’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 40, 2, pp.35–61.

            27. Sewell, W. (1992) ‘A theory of structure: duality, agency and transformation’, American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1, pp.1–29.

            28. Schutz, A. (1953) ‘Common sense and scientific interpretation of human action’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, September, pp.1–37.

            29. Tsoukas, H. (1996) ‘The firm as a distributed knowledge system: a constructionist approach’, Strategic Management Journal, 17, S2, pp.11–25.

            30. Vygotsky, L. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.

            31. Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

            32. Williams, A. (2007) ‘International labour migration and tacit knowledge transactions: a multi-level perspective’, Global Networks, 7, 1, pp.29–50.


            Comment on this article