104
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      Prometheus is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Book review

      book-review
      Prometheus
      Pluto Journals
      Bookmark

            Content

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            Journal
            10.2307/j50022063
            prometheus
            Prometheus
            Pluto Journals
            0810-9028
            1470-1030
            1 September 2015
            : 33
            : 3 ( doiID: 10.1080/prometheus.33.issue-3 )
            : 330-334
            Affiliations
            Universidade Nova de Lisboa
            Article
            08109028.2016.1207866
            10.1080/08109028.2016.1207866
            2e7ce2dd-bcfe-4469-814a-dcaecd801461
            © 2015 Pluto Journals

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            Product

            Routledge international handbook of ignorance studies , edited by and , London, Routledge, 408 pp., £125 (hardback), ISBN-978-0-415-71896-7

            Custom metadata
            eng

            Computer science,Arts,Social & Behavioral Sciences,Law,History,Economics

            References

            1. Colville, I., Pye, A. and Brown, A. (2016) ‘Sensemaking processes and Weickarious learning’, Management Learning, 47, 1, pp.3–13.

            2. Dewey, J. (1930) How We Think, Heath, London.

            3. Economist (2015) ‘The age of the whistleblower’, Economist, 5 December, pp.55–7.

            4. Koppman, S. (2016) ‘Different like me: why cultural omnivores get creative jobs’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 61, 2, pp.291–331.

            5. Marçal, D. (2014) Pseudociência, Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos, Lisboa.

            6. Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J., Barr, N., Koehler, D. and Fugelsang, J. (2015) ‘On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit’, Judgment and Decision Making, 10, 6, pp.549–63.

            7. Pfeffer, J. (2015) Leadership BS, Harper, New York, NY.

            8. Weick, K. (1998) ‘Foresights of failure: an appreciation of Barry Turner’, Journal of Contingencies and Crises Management, 6, 2, pp.72–5.

            9. Weick, K. (2001) ‘Leadership as the legitimation of doubt’ in Bennis, W., Spreitzer, G. and Cummings, T. (eds) The Future of Leadership: Today's Top Leadership Thinkers Speak to Tomorrow's Leaders, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp.91–102.

            10. Weick, K. (2007) ‘Foreword’ in Kessler, E. and Bailey, J. (eds) Handbook of Organizational and Managerial Wisdom, Sage, Thousand Oaks CA, pp.ix–xiii.

            11. Whitehead, A. (1929) Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

            Comments

            Comment on this article