Book review

If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

Prometheus is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journals. Furthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

Prometheus

Volume 34, Issue 3-4

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: found

Is Open Access

Book review

book-review

Author(s): William Kingston

Publication date (Print): 1 September 2016

Journal: Prometheus

Publisher: Pluto Journals

Bookmark

Content

Author and article information

Contributors

William Kingston

Journal

Journal ID (doi): 10.2307/j50022063

Journal ID (jcode): prometheus

Title: Prometheus

Publisher: Pluto Journals

ISSN: 0810-9028

ISSN: 1470-1030

Publication date (Print): 1 September 2016

Volume: 34

Issue: 3-4 ( doiID: 10.1080/prometheus.34.issue-3-4 )

Pages: 260-263

Affiliations

Trinity College, Dublin

Article

Publisher ID: 08109028.2017.1362820

DOI: 10.1080/08109028.2017.1362820

SO-VID: 1dde81f7-9930-47c2-a252-15ebca205bf3

License:

All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Product

Patent pledges: global perspectives on patent law's private ordering frontier , edited by Jorge Contreras and Meredith Jacob, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 2017, 343 pp., £100 (hardback) ISBN 9781785362484

Custom metadata

lang eng

ScienceOpen disciplines: Computer science,Arts,Social & Behavioral Sciences,Law,History,Economics

References

Bessen, J. and Meurer, M. (2008) Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.
Boldrin, M. and Levine, D. (2008) Against Intellectual Monopoly, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
European Commission (2016) Final Commission Decision, C (2016) 5605. Brussels, 30 August.
Hun Park, J. (2010) Patents and Industry Standards, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham UK.
Kingston, W. (2010) Beyond Intellectual Property: Matching Information Protection to Innovation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham UK.
Machlup, F. and Penrose, E. (1950) ‘The patent controversy in the nineteenth century’, Journal of Economic History, 10, 1, pp.1-29.
Mason, P. (2015) Postcapitalism: A Guide to Our Future, Allen Lane, London.
Witherspoon, J. (ed.) (1978) Non-obviousness: The Ultimate Condition of Patentability, Bureau of International Affairs, Washington DC.

Comments

Comment on this article

[1] Bessen, J. and Meurer, M. (2008) Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.

[2] Boldrin, M. and Levine, D. (2008) Against Intellectual Monopoly, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

[3] European Commission (2016) Final Commission Decision, C (2016) 5605. Brussels, 30 August.

[4] Hun Park, J. (2010) Patents and Industry Standards, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham UK.

[5] Kingston, W. (2010) Beyond Intellectual Property: Matching Information Protection to Innovation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham UK.

[6] Machlup, F. and Penrose, E. (1950) ‘The patent controversy in the nineteenth century’, Journal of Economic History, 10, 1, pp.1-29.

[7] Mason, P. (2015) Postcapitalism: A Guide to Our Future, Allen Lane, London.

[8] Witherspoon, J. (ed.) (1978) Non-obviousness: The Ultimate Condition of Patentability, Bureau of International Affairs, Washington DC.