68
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      Prometheus is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Book review

      book-review
      Prometheus
      Pluto Journals
      Bookmark

            Content

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            Journal
            10.2307/j50022063
            prometheus
            Prometheus
            Pluto Journals
            0810-9028
            1470-1030
            1 September 2016
            : 34
            : 3-4 ( doiID: 10.1080/prometheus.34.issue-3-4 )
            : 260-263
            Affiliations
            Trinity College, Dublin
            Article
            08109028.2017.1362820
            10.1080/08109028.2017.1362820
            1dde81f7-9930-47c2-a252-15ebca205bf3
            © 2016 Pluto Journals

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            Product

            Patent pledges: global perspectives on patent law's private ordering frontier , edited by and , Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 2017, 343 pp., £100 (hardback) ISBN 9781785362484

            Custom metadata
            eng

            Computer science,Arts,Social & Behavioral Sciences,Law,History,Economics

            References

            1. Bessen, J. and Meurer, M. (2008) Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.

            2. Boldrin, M. and Levine, D. (2008) Against Intellectual Monopoly, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

            3. European Commission (2016) Final Commission Decision, C (2016) 5605. Brussels, 30 August.

            4. Hun Park, J. (2010) Patents and Industry Standards, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham UK.

            5. Kingston, W. (2010) Beyond Intellectual Property: Matching Information Protection to Innovation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham UK.

            6. Machlup, F. and Penrose, E. (1950) ‘The patent controversy in the nineteenth century’, Journal of Economic History, 10, 1, pp.1-29.

            7. Mason, P. (2015) Postcapitalism: A Guide to Our Future, Allen Lane, London.

            8. Witherspoon, J. (ed.) (1978) Non-obviousness: The Ultimate Condition of Patentability, Bureau of International Affairs, Washington DC.

            Comments

            Comment on this article