BIOTECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENTS IN JAPAN: COMMENTS ON SAXONHOUSE&apos;S PERSPECTIVE

Tisdell, Clem

doi:10.1080/08109028608629592

ScienceOpen: research and publishing network

For Publishers

For Researchers

Blog
About

Search
Advanced search

views

recommends

If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

Prometheus is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journals. Furthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

scite_

Prometheus

Volume 4, Issue 1

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: found

Is Open Access

BIOTECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENTS IN JAPAN: COMMENTS ON SAXONHOUSE'S PERSPECTIVE

Published

other

Author(s): Clem Tisdell

Publication date (Print): June 1986

Journal: Prometheus

Publisher: Pluto Journals

Bookmark

Content

Author and article information

Journal

Journal ID (publisher-id): cpro20

Journal ID (archive): CPRO

Title: Prometheus

Subtitle: Critical Studies in Innovation

Publisher: Pluto Journals

ISSN (Print): 0810-9028

ISSN (Electronic): 1470-1030

Publication date (Print): June 1986

Volume: 4

Issue: 1

Pages: 167-170

Affiliations

Article

Publisher ID: 8629592 Coden ID: Prometheus, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1986: pp. 167–170

DOI: 10.1080/08109028608629592

SO-VID: f121f2d8-532c-480a-8083-38962e58c72d

License:

All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

History

Page count

Figures: 0, Tables: 0, References: 15, Pages: 4

NOTES AND REFERENCES

Gary R. Saxonhouse, ‘Biotechnology in Japan: industrial policy and factor market distortions’, Prometheus, 3, 2, 1985, pp. 277—314. See also idem., ‘Industrial policy and factor markets: biotechnology in Japan and the United States’, Department of Economics, University of Michigan, 1985, mimeo; idem., ‘The micro- and macroeconomics of foreign sales to Japan’ in W. Cline (ed.), Trade Policy in the 1980s, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1983, pp. 259—305.
Saxonhouse, ‘Biotechnology in Japan …’, op. cit., p. 310.
Saxonhouse, ‘The micro- and macroeconomics of foreign sales to Japan’, op. cit. p. 273.
ibid, p. 278.
Saxonhouse, ‘Biotechnology in Japan …’, op. cit., p. 311.
M. Cantley and K. Sargeant, ‘Biotechnology: the challenge to Europe’, Revue d'Economie Industrielle, 18, 1981, pp. 365—80.
G. Gellf, ‘Les bioindustries au Japan’, and J, Liouville, ‘Les pays les plus avances en biotechnologie et la France’, Revue d'Economie Industrielle, 18, 1981, pp. 365—80.
P.K. Marstrand, Patterns of Change in Biotechnology, Occasional Paper 15, Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, 1981.
A.T. Bull, G. Holt and M.D. Lilly, Biotechnology: International Trends and Perspectives, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, 1982.
M. Tanaka, ‘Biotechnology in Japan’ in Biotech 83: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Commercial Applications and Implications of Biotechnology, Online, Northwood, England, 1983, pp. 1—12.
F.M. Olson, The Logic of Collective Action, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1965.
Saxonhouse, “Biotechnology in Japan …”, op. cit., pp. 310—11.
Saxonhouse, “Biotechnology in Japan …”, op. cit., pp. 303—8.
F.P. Johnson, Co-operative Research in Industry: An Economic Study, Martin Robertson, London, 1973; and C.A. Tisdell, Science and Technology Policy: Priorities of Governments, Chapman and Hall, London, 1981.
See, for example, Department of Science and Technology, Biotechnology: Appropriate Areas for Commercial Exploitation in Australia, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1983; and ASTEC, Biotechnology in Australia, AGPS, Canberra, 1982.

Comments

Comment on this article

[1] Gary R. Saxonhouse, ‘Biotechnology in Japan: industrial policy and factor market distortions’, Prometheus, 3, 2, 1985, pp. 277—314. See also idem., ‘Industrial policy and factor markets: biotechnology in Japan and the United States’, Department of Economics, University of Michigan, 1985, mimeo; idem., ‘The micro- and macroeconomics of foreign sales to Japan’ in W. Cline (ed.), Trade Policy in the 1980s, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1983, pp. 259—305.

[2] Saxonhouse, ‘Biotechnology in Japan …’, op. cit., p. 310.

[3] Saxonhouse, ‘The micro- and macroeconomics of foreign sales to Japan’, op. cit. p. 273.

[4] ibid, p. 278.

[5] Saxonhouse, ‘Biotechnology in Japan …’, op. cit., p. 311.

[6] M. Cantley and K. Sargeant, ‘Biotechnology: the challenge to Europe’, Revue d'Economie Industrielle, 18, 1981, pp. 365—80.

[7] G. Gellf, ‘Les bioindustries au Japan’, and J, Liouville, ‘Les pays les plus avances en biotechnologie et la France’, Revue d'Economie Industrielle, 18, 1981, pp. 365—80.

[8] P.K. Marstrand, Patterns of Change in Biotechnology, Occasional Paper 15, Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, 1981.

[9] A.T. Bull, G. Holt and M.D. Lilly, Biotechnology: International Trends and Perspectives, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, 1982.

[10] M. Tanaka, ‘Biotechnology in Japan’ in Biotech 83: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Commercial Applications and Implications of Biotechnology, Online, Northwood, England, 1983, pp. 1—12.

[11] F.M. Olson, The Logic of Collective Action, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1965.

[12] Saxonhouse, “Biotechnology in Japan …”, op. cit., pp. 310—11.

[13] Saxonhouse, “Biotechnology in Japan …”, op. cit., pp. 303—8.

[14] F.P. Johnson, Co-operative Research in Industry: An Economic Study, Martin Robertson, London, 1973; and C.A. Tisdell, Science and Technology Policy: Priorities of Governments, Chapman and Hall, London, 1981.

[15] See, for example, Department of Science and Technology, Biotechnology: Appropriate Areas for Commercial Exploitation in Australia, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1983; and ASTEC, Biotechnology in Australia, AGPS, Canberra, 1982.