Just over three years ago, in June 1984, the government of Canada received the report of its task force on federal policies and programs for technology development (the Wright report). Three months later, this (Liberal) government was defeated in a general election. In its election platform, and during its first months in office, the new (Progressive Conservative) government appeared to favour the kinds of measures and approaches recommended by Wright and his colleagues. Since then the picture has been somewhat confused. On the one hand, there have been changes in policy, budget cuts and some reorganisation affecting federal science departments and agencies. On the other, there have been more programme studies, some programme changes, and increasing emphasis placed on the participation of the private sector in co-operative R & D. This paper looks back to the recommendations of the Wright report and to what has happened to them under the new government. The paper concludes that the report was timely, that it had a positive influence on some of the new government's actions, but, like other similar reports, its impact was diminished by events. The paper also concludes that the Wright report's main thrust — the improved management of federal activities in technology development — has been set back by budget and other cuts and changes.
Report of the Task Force on Federal Policies and Programs for Technology Development, Ministry of State for Science and Technology, Ottawa, July 1984.
Andrew Wilson H.. 1985. . Technology development: a Canadian priority. . Prometheus . , Vol. 3((1)) June;: 86––109. .
Senate Standing Committee on National Finance, Federal Government Support for Technological Advancement: An Overview, Ottawa, August 1984; Science Council of Canada, Canadian Industrial Development: Some Policy Directions, Report No. 37, Ottawa, September 1984.
Minister sees new boom for research industry’, Globe and Mail, Toronto, 20 September 1984.
Private sector awakening to fact it must make more R & D investment’, Financial Post, 27 October 1984.
Department of Finance, A New Direction for Canada, Ottawa, November 1984, p. 25.
R & D efforts must be redirected, streamlined’, Canadian Research, December/January 1984–85, p. 31.
ibid.
Ministry of State for Science and Technology, Science, Technology and Economic Development, Ottawa, February 1985.
Science Council of Canada, The National Science and Technology Forum, Ottawa, November 1986.
Ministry of State for Science and Technology, press release, 6 March 1985.
Ministry of State for Science and Technology, Research & Development and the Budget: A Key to Economic Growth, Ottawa, May 1985.
Ministerial Task Force on Program Review, New Management Initiatives, Ottawa, May 1985.
ibid., p. 27.
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, Completing the Bridge to the 90's, A Second Five-year Plan, Ottawa, June 1985.
National Research Council, A Practical Perspective, The NRC Plan 1986–90, Ottawa, October 1985.
The National Science and Technology Forum, op. cit., p. 20.
Rt. Hon. Brian Mulroney, notes for an address on research and development (University of Waterloo), PMO Ottawa, 4 March 1987.
Hon. Frank Oberle, Notes for an Address, (Financial Post Conference), Ministry of State for Science and Technology, Ottawa, 24 March 1987.
Hon. Michael H. Wilson, Tax Reform, Speech delivered to the House of Commons, Ottawa, 18 June 1987.
Ministerial Task Force on Program Review, op. cit., p. 15.
ibid., p. 26.
Study Team Review, Education and Research, Ministerial Task Force on Program Review, Ministry of Supply and Services, Ottawa, November 1985, p. 59.
National Research Council, A Practical Perspective: First Update 1986, Ottawa, June 1987.
Report of the National Research Council Task Group, Ministry of State for Science and Technology, Ottawa, 18 February 1987.
Economic Council of Canada, Making Technology Work: Innovation and Jobs in Canada, Ottawa, 1987. p. 1.
Walter F. Light, ‘R & D: it's our national shame’, Engineering, Canadian Technical Publications, Toronto, 10 November 1980.