119
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      Prometheus is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      JAPAN'S USE OF COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH TO BUILD A COMPUTER INDUSTRY: LESSONS FOR THE UK?

      Published
      research-article
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            The announcement by Japan's Ministry of Trade and Industry in 1981 of its intention to use government-sponsored collaborative research to lead the world towards ‘Fifth Generation’ computing prompted a sudden enthusiasm for collaboration in Europe and the US. The UK was at the vanguard of this movement to ‘learn from Japan’ and used pre-competitive collaborative research as the central organizing theme of its Alvey Programme to strengthen the country's ability to compete in advanced information technology (IT). While Alvey produced a number of benefits, commercialization of research outputs fell short of popular Western perceptions of Japan's achievements. However, a review of MITI schemes prior to the Fifth Generation announcement reveals that, for the most part, they were neither pre-competitive nor collaborative. Moreover, problems with abstracting the operation of MITI's schemes from other aspects of Japan's national innovation system undermine their value as a model for UK policy.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            cpro20
            CPRO
            Prometheus
            Critical Studies in Innovation
            Pluto Journals
            0810-9028
            1470-1030
            June 1995
            : 13
            : 1
            : 90-106
            Affiliations
            Article
            8629193 Prometheus, Vol. 13, No. 1, 1995: pp. 90–106
            10.1080/08109029508629193
            a914bf38-897e-4172-9df0-b3e010ba43a2
            Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Page count
            Figures: 0, Tables: 0, References: 43, Pages: 17
            Categories
            Original Articles

            Computer science,Arts,Social & Behavioral Sciences,Law,History,Economics
            computer industry,collaborative research,government policy,information technology,competitiveness

            NOTES AND REFERENCES

            1. Wolferen argues that the metaphor is misleading because “Japan has nothing comparable to a chairman of the board, a president or even a board of directors as a means of providing a unified view on which to base decisions.” K. van Wolferen, The Enigma of Japanese Power: People and Politics in a Stateless Nation, Macmillan, London, 1990, p.58. Also, Hart has noted that there is some dispute within the small group of scholars who write seriously about Japan as to whether the state is central or peripheral to Japan's economic development. J. A. Hart, Rival Capitalists: International Competitiveness in the United States, Japan and Western Europe, Cornell University Press, New York, 1992, p.37.

            2. According to Femá, some 20 other national programs followed the announcement of Japan's FGCS program. G. Ferná, ‘R&D programmes for information technology’, OECD Observer, August/September, 1989, pp.10–13.

            3. The authors were members of a team which evaluated the structure and organisation of both the Alvey Programme and the subsequent Information Engineering Advanced Technology Programme. The views expressed here are entirely their own.

            4. These interviews were conducted by Ray as part of a Science and Technology Agency Fellowship spent at the National Institute of Science and Technology Policy (NISTEP), Tokyo, Japan.

            5. Macdonald has questioned the meaning of ‘pre-competitive’ research, suggesting that there are no parts of a firm's activities --- and certainly not R&D --- that are totally removed from the need to compete. S. Macdonald, ‘Formal collaboration and informal information flow’, International Journal of Technology Management 7, 1/3, pp.49–60.

            6. Walker W.. 1993. . “National innovation systems. ”. In National Innovation Systems . , Edited by: Nelson R.. p. 180 Oxford : : Oxford University Press. .

            7. J. Schumpeter, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Unwin, London, 1943, chapter 7.

            8. van Wolferen, op cit., pp.492–3.

            9. C. Johnson, MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy 1925-1975, Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1982, chapter 1.

            10. H. Odagiri and A. Goto, ‘The Japanese System of Innovation: Past, Present and Future’ in R. Nelson (ed.), op. cit, 1993, p.106.

            11. I. Nonaka and T. Ray, Knowledge Creation in Japanese Firms, Research Report 34, National Institute of Science and Technology Policy Science and Technology Agency, Japan, 1993.

            12. I. Nonaka, ‘Redundant, overlapping organization: a Japanese approach to managing the innovation process’, California Management Review, 32, 3, 1990, pp.27–38. See also I. Nonaka, ‘Creating organizational order out of chaos: self-renewal in Japanese firms’, California Management Review, 30, 3, 1988, pp.57–73; and idem, ‘Toward middle-up-down management: accelerating information creation’, Sloan Management Review, 29, 3, 1988, pp.9–18.

            13. Walker, op cit., pp. 180–2.

            14. Macdonald, op cit., p.52.

            15. van Wolferen, op cit., p.165.

            16. Original data were supplied by the Japanese Ministry of Education, Science and Culture (Monbusho), and made available to the authors by A. Arima, President, RIKEN, Wako-shi, Saitama, 351-01, Japan. Arima the data are also used A. Arima, ‘Daigaku kaikaku no igi’ [‘The significance of university reforms’], Hiroshima Daigaku Foramu [Hiroshima University Forum], 26, 10, 1994, pp.10–13.

            17. Anchordoguy M.. 1989. . Computers Inc.: Japan's Challenge to IBM . , p. 15 Cambridge , Mass. : : Harvard University Press. .

            18. Fransman M.. 1990. . The Market and Beyond: Cooperation and Competition in Information Technology in the Japanese System . , p. 27 Cambridge : : Cambridge University Press. .

            19. Levy J. D. and Samuels R. J.. 1989. . Institutions and Innovations: Research Collaboration as Technological Strategy in Japan . , p. 31 Cambridge , Mass. : : Department of Political Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. .

            20. Fransman, op cit., p.34.

            21. Okimoto D., Sugano T. and Weinstein F.. 1984. . Competitive Edge: the Semiconductor industry in the USA and Japan . , p. 19 Stanford : : Stanford University Press. .

            22. Okimoto D.. 1986. . “The Japanese challenge in high technology’ in National Academy of Sciences. ”. In The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth . , p. 561 Washington , DC : : National Academy Press. .

            23. H. Odagiri, ‘Government policy toward industrial R&D: theory, empirical findings, and Japan's experience’, Policies on Industrial R&D, 1989, pp.211–26.

            24. Oakley B. and Owen K.. 1989. . Alvey: Britain's Strategic Computing Initiative . , p. 17 Cambridge , Mass. : : MIT Press. .

            25. ibid, p.25.

            26. Cusumano M.. 1992. . Japan's Software Factories: A Challenge to US Management . , p. 411 Oxford : : Oxford University Press. .

            27. Japan's ‘fifth generation’ computer development project comes to an end’, Washington Post, 2 June 1992.

            28. D. Swinbanks and C. Anderson, ‘Japan stubs its toes on fifth-generation computer’, Nature, 26 March 1992, p.273.

            29. Koo-ryoku ushinau kanmin kyodoo kai-hatsu’ [‘Government-public development (projects) are losing their effectiveness’], Nikkei Business, 19 June 1992, pp.20–1.

            30. M. Cross, ‘Farewell to computing's fifth generation’, New Scientist, 13 June 1992, pp.12–13.

            31. Fujikura, Fujitsu, Furukawa, Hitachi, Japan Iron and Steel Federation, Matsushita, Mitsubishi Electric, Mitsubishi Research, NEC, NTT, Oki, Sanyo, Sharp, Sumitomo Electric, and Toshiba.

            32. Gesellschaft fur Mathematik und Datenevarbeitung mbH(GMD), Institute of Systems and Science, National University of Singapore, Stiching Neurale Netwerke, and the Swedish Institute of Computer Science.

            33. Real world computing: a brave new world’, Tokyo Business, March 1993, p.3.

            34. Anchordoguy, op cit., p.43.

            35. Cusumano, op cit., p.389.

            36. Guy K., Georghiou L., Quintus P., Hobday M., Cameron H. and Ray T.. 1991. . Evaluation of the Alvey Programme for Advanced Information Technology . , p. vii London : : HMSO. .

            37. Realising Our Potential: A Strategy for Science, Engineering and Technology, HMSO, London, 1993.

            38. UK Technology Foresight, Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology, London, January 1994, p.1.

            39. Waldegrave W.. 1994. . Launch of government's technology foresight programme,. . Foresight: Newsletter of the Technology Foresight Programme . , Vol. 1: Spring;: 1

            40. UK Technology Foresight, op cit., p.1.

            41. Evan M. and Oak P.. 1990. . R&D consortia: a new US organizational form. . Sloan Management Review . , Vol. 31((3)): 37––46. .

            42. Woodward F.. 1965. . Structure of Industrial Research Associations . , p. 39 Paris : : OECD. .

            43. Georghiou L. and Metcalfe J. S.. 1993. . Evaluation of the impact of European community research programmes upon industrial competitiveness. . R&D Management . , Vol. 23((2)): 168

            Comments

            Comment on this article